With the current information available, I don't think People will line up to throw their Bitcoins to this Project that "claims" to be a real estate Cryptocurrency along with greedy goals, ICO without escrow (sorry Here's details about escrow 
)
So literally Investors are supposed to pay 5 BTC to your CEO because he owns Microsoft or what? You're implying escrows to pay fees. Just so you know, It should be the other way round instead.
I wouldn't trust a project like this.
)Quote
Escrow++ :
We are open to meet in real life up to 5 people in a public
place in Switzerland or in France during the UTIPCO and to go
to a notary of the choice of these people to certify with the
identity of the CEO as the CEO of CurrenSky and his
responsibilities of the entire project.
Our conditions :
This/These people have to pay for our CEO trip to the
concerned place back and forth (from Lausanne in
Switzerland).
In addition and before the trip, the public has to transfer to
1PYqJWPF2P5MD77PWu99AjziXvvbA4RCM7 5 BTC to cover
the costs of such a procedure.
We are open to meet in real life up to 5 people in a public
place in Switzerland or in France during the UTIPCO and to go
to a notary of the choice of these people to certify with the
identity of the CEO as the CEO of CurrenSky and his
responsibilities of the entire project.
Our conditions :
This/These people have to pay for our CEO trip to the
concerned place back and forth (from Lausanne in
Switzerland).
In addition and before the trip, the public has to transfer to
1PYqJWPF2P5MD77PWu99AjziXvvbA4RCM7 5 BTC to cover
the costs of such a procedure.
So literally Investors are supposed to pay 5 BTC to your CEO because he owns Microsoft or what? You're implying escrows to pay fees. Just so you know, It should be the other way round instead.
I wouldn't trust a project like this.
Hello nelson4lov,
Thank you very much for your feedback.
We tried to explain a few times why standard escrow system cannot fit our needs.
You can read them all in the past few pages.
We even explain it in our announce :
Quote
No escrow planned yet (Escrow are blocking the money and to launch CurrenSky we need to purchase the asset before its launch)
We are still studying the question and we are open to any suggestion to fit our needs
We are going to be as transparent as possible
We are still studying the question and we are open to any suggestion to fit our needs
We are going to be as transparent as possible
Maybe we need to make it more visible in our communication, it looks like people do not get why we cannot use such a system which means they did not read or understood what we explained.
Anthony does not own Microsoft, if it was the case, there will be no need to make an ICO.
We do not ask to pay fee in our "Escrow++" proposition, we ask the concerned people to pre-pay for the notary fees, we do not want to organize a meeting with a notary if we cannot pay them.
On the other hand, to try to take the point anyway, we can investigate with notaries in France (less expensive than in Switzerland) to have the exact price quote so we can adjust the fees more accurately if the concerned people wants to go in France with Anthony.
Keep in mind that the document has to be valid in the maximum of countries to be able to cover our "UTIPCOers" / financers.
So consider it as a task for us : we will come back soon with a more accurate price quote and will adjust it (and try to come with proofs of the price quote from an authentic notary, but again, this is internet, whatever the proof is, you cannot really trust it... We cannot do miracles).
UPDATE :
We are currently in contact with a Notary office in France to see what kind of document could fit our needs as explained above and what costs would be engaged for it to be valid internationally (and in english...).
UPDATE :
The process takes longer than expected, the notary seems to be lost with the concept of CC's and so even more with CurrenSky, we are still working on it to get answers and quotes...
