Is it necessary to let vanitygen run continuously in order to find the desired key, or can I stop it then start it again?
Ie. does it use the same starting point every time, so that when I start it for a second time, it goes through the keys that it has already gone through the first time?
Asked a third way, to make sure I'm making myself clear, if there's a 50% chance a key will be found in 24 hours of continuous operation, is there also a 50% chance a key will be found if I run the application for one hour on 24 separate days?
Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 175. (Read 1153620 times)
Great app. But what do I do with the generated data? How do I get to use it?
It's in the first post ("How do I get the generated private key into bitcoin?"). Follow that, and it will put the address in your wallet and its addresslist, so you can use it. Make sure to back up your wallet beforehand.Although nowadays you can have mtgox "eat" your private key, and then all funds on it will periodically be deposited into your account.
Great app. But what do I do with the generated data? How do I get to use it?
Interesting. New version of AMD video drivers came out, and now ocl is working fine 
Guess it was them, not you. Thanks!
Guess it was them, not you. Thanks! 
Unfortunately it doesn't work for me (Ubuntu, sdk 2.1, ati 5970):
I tried many parameters like -V -S etc, but without success :-(.
Code:
miner@miner1:~/vanitygen$ ./oclvanitygen -d3 1
WARNING: Built with OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
WARNING: Use OpenSSL 1.0.0d+ for best performance
Difficulty: 1
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...done!
WARNING: AMD BFI_INT patching failed
Match idx: 0
CPU hash: 5a6de23e99d7d70d986fc0daad500c39af74af20
GPU hash: 1db6a03acbf6e04f0425be28ff3dcebbc46911e9
Found delta: 655355 Start delta: 1
[1.92 Mkey/s][total 655360] Match idx: 0
CPU hash: e3efc75d73fd9934403f2ee1c1fc42bcaaacce0a
GPU hash: a8b1a2db739c394901453baa2b5a61ec6775b99b
Found delta: 655355 Start delta: 1
Match idx: 0
I tried many parameters like -V -S etc, but without success :-(.
How i should specify a platform for OpenCL?
-p 0 not works for me.
Upd. Solved. Have to specify platform first, pattern next.
-p 0 not works for me.
Upd. Solved. Have to specify platform first, pattern next.
This is awesome. I ran it on my linuxcoin mining rig after "sudo apt-get install libpcre3-dev" no problem.
Rather than running it separately for each pattern, if you use the option to create a file with the patterns you're looking for, it can check each address it generates against all of them at once, which should be faster.Code:
[user@miner vanitygen]$ patterns=( vanity1 vanity2 vanity3 ... vanityN )
[user@miner vanitygen]$ for pattern in "${patterns[@]}"; do ./vanitygen 1${pattern}; done
Code:
./vanitygen --help
This is awesome. I ran it on my linuxcoin mining rig after "sudo apt-get install libpcre3-dev" no problem.
Rather than running it separately for each pattern, if you use the option to create a file with the patterns you're looking for, it can check each address it generates against all of them at once, which should be faster. Code:
[user@miner vanitygen]$ patterns=( vanity1 vanity2 vanity3 ... vanityN )
[user@miner vanitygen]$ for pattern in "${patterns[@]}"; do ./vanitygen 1${pattern}; done
This is awesome. I ran it on my linuxcoin mining rig after "sudo apt-get install libpcre3-dev" no problem.
Code:
[user@miner vanitygen]$ patterns=( vanity1 vanity2 vanity3 ... vanityN )
[user@miner vanitygen]$ for pattern in "${patterns[@]}"; do ./vanitygen 1${pattern}; done
I've tried building oclvanitygen on my headless Ubuntu miner without success.
It always stops due to not finding the library "OpenCL". It compiles ok (because I manually added the SDK include path) but can't link.
I have the AMD SDK 2.4 installed (can mine without issues) but as far as I can see the SDK lib/x86 directory only contains shared .so files. There are no .a static libs for linking present.
Does anyone here know more about this?
Are the static libs put somewhere else or need to be built separately?
EDIT: Here's a patch for what I did to get oclvanitygen to build.
Just changes to Makefile so correct include and lib dirs are used.
Assumes 32 bit as otherwise the lib dir is x86_64
If you save this code into file p1 in src dir, cp Makefile Makefile.org,
then you can apply the patch with, patch
I get about 21 MH/s when using oclvanitygen with 1x 5830.
It always stops due to not finding the library "OpenCL". It compiles ok (because I manually added the SDK include path) but can't link.
I have the AMD SDK 2.4 installed (can mine without issues) but as far as I can see the SDK lib/x86 directory only contains shared .so files. There are no .a static libs for linking present.
Does anyone here know more about this?
Are the static libs put somewhere else or need to be built separately?
EDIT: Here's a patch for what I did to get oclvanitygen to build.
Just changes to Makefile so correct include and lib dirs are used.
Assumes 32 bit as otherwise the lib dir is x86_64
Code:
--- Makefile.org 2011-09-14 13:01:06.000000000 +0700
+++ Makefile 2011-09-14 13:03:57.000000000 +0700
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
LIBS=-lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread
CFLAGS=-ggdb -O3 -Wall
+OCLFLAGS= $(CFLAGS) -I$(AMDAPPSDKROOT)/include/
OBJS=vanitygen.o oclvanitygen.o keyconv.o pattern.o util.o
PROGS=vanitygen keyconv
@@ -9,7 +10,7 @@
$(CC) $^ -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(LIBS)
oclvanitygen: oclvanitygen.o pattern.o util.o
- $(CC) $^ -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(LIBS) -lOpenCL
+ $(CC) $^ -o $@ $(OCLFLAGS) $(LIBS) -L $(AMDAPPSDKROOT)/lib/x86/ -lOpenCL
keyconv: keyconv.o util.o
$(CC) $^ -o $@ $(CFLAGS) $(LIBS)
If you save this code into file p1 in src dir, cp Makefile Makefile.org,
then you can apply the patch with, patch
I get about 21 MH/s when using oclvanitygen with 1x 5830.
version seems to be 125 but I know you knew that.. this for those who come after you.
anyways can we get the error message about bitcoin addies needed to start with 1 when using -x version?
it doesnt like when i do -r 125 scow and yet if I just do -r 125 cow it comes up with n scowdkjgfksdhg addy
it also doesnt seem to like the lowercase i when i use version, which is totally blowing my vanity addy of sir1oin and even ir1oin doesnt work
Same problems here. anyways can we get the error message about bitcoin addies needed to start with 1 when using -x version?
it doesnt like when i do -r 125 scow and yet if I just do -r 125 cow it comes up with n scowdkjgfksdhg addy
it also doesnt seem to like the lowercase i when i use version, which is totally blowing my vanity addy of sir1oin and even ir1oin doesnt work
version seems to be 125 but I know you knew that.. this for those who come after you.
anyways can we get the error message about bitcoin addies needed to start with 1 when using -x version?
it doesnt like when i do -r 125 scow and yet if I just do -r 125 cow it comes up with n scowdkjgfksdhg addy
it also doesnt seem to like the lowercase i when i use version, which is totally blowing my vanity addy of sir1oin and even ir1oin doesnt work
anyways can we get the error message about bitcoin addies needed to start with 1 when using -x version?
it doesnt like when i do -r 125 scow and yet if I just do -r 125 cow it comes up with n scowdkjgfksdhg addy
it also doesnt seem to like the lowercase i when i use version, which is totally blowing my vanity addy of sir1oin and even ir1oin doesnt work
What's the version of SolidCoin addresses?
Nice avatar, by the way. May you be touched by his noodley appendage.
Nice avatar, by the way. May you be touched by his noodley appendage.
Code:
-XGenerate address with the given version
awesome, thanks for pointing that out!
Edit: Did you mean "vanitygen --help"? I can't find anything about SolidCoin addresses.
Edit: Did you mean "vanitygen --help"? I can't find anything about SolidCoin addresses.
Any chance you could add a feature for generating SolidCoin addresses?
Already done check the help
Any chance you could add a feature for generating SolidCoin addresses?
Quad-core desktop CPUs, 64-bit mode: 300-750 Kkey/s.
I get over 920 Kkey/s with my i7-920, not overclocked. 
I need a faster rig .... current one
50% in 17yrs3
50% in 17yrs3
This is awesome, makes me wish I had something better then a old centrino laptop 
Or you can ask somebody trustworkthy owning a rigI.e. nobody
Jump to: