Pages:
Author

Topic: VanitySearch (Yet another address prefix finder) - page 9. (Read 31225 times)

member
Activity: 72
Merit: 16
THE THING GO SKRAAA
My brother Miha was born yesterday so I thought I can make him a vanity address with his name and give him some Bitcoin as a gift. I wonder how much it's going to be worth in 10 or 20 years. Never too early to start investing Cheesy And the date of first transaction is his birthday which is really cool, right?

Here is his vanity address if you feel generous today and want to gift him a few sats: 3Miha3LSkHrtioPfgismPCQ6KfUa4wzPu1
I promise I will not touch this address. Ever. I will teach him all about Bitcoin when he's old enough.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
Wich version will run on a RTX3090 ?

I alwais get error when trying to run this software.

error is : GPUEngine: Launch: misaligned address
Do not use full address, if you have a full address you are looking for, delete the last 8-9 characters from the end of the address and the program will work fine on 30xx cards
full member
Activity: 206
Merit: 100
Wich version will run on a RTX3090 ?

I alwais get error when trying to run this software.

error is : GPUEngine: Launch: misaligned address
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
But how does it reduce the range by 2^128? By using the public key

PublicKeys are symmetrical till N/2. And 2^256 /2 is 2^254. So why do you repeat the wrong number of 2^128?

I won't complicate things but they are actually symmetrical up to N/6 - not that it would help bigvito get to 2^128 though (It'd still only reduce to about 2^253.48 (N/2 actually makes it go down to 2^255 not 2^254).
a.a
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
But how does it reduce the range by 2^128? By using the public key

PublicKeys are symmetrical till N/2. And 2^256 /2 is 2^254. So why do you repeat the wrong number of 2^128?

full member
Activity: 706
Merit: 111
So basically BitCrack2 with PubKeys.

https://github.com/kanhavishva/BitCrack2#xpoint-search-mode

 But how does it reduce the range by 2^128?

Bitcrack and vanitysearch are not the same.

What range is this searching in? https://github.com/kanhavishva/BitCrack2#xpoint-search-mode

But how does it reduce the range by 2^128? By using the public key
a.a
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
So basically BitCrack2 with PubKeys.

https://github.com/kanhavishva/BitCrack2#xpoint-search-mode

 But how does it reduce the range by 2^128?
full member
Activity: 706
Merit: 111
Kangaroo is cracking the discrete Logarythm of the pubkey. VanitySearch is looking for Prefixes which are pubkeys sha256 and ripemd160.

How do you want to mix those?

Can you search for an address with vanitygen with a public key? I was thinking would that be able to shorten the search space like kangaroo.
Not 100% sure with vanitygen but vanity search takes inputted address and converts it to its RIPEMD160, then searches for a match for the RIPEMD160. One could tweak code to search for a pubkey which would save one sha256 and the one RIPEMD160 function.

Priv key
Pub key
sha256
ripemd160

so you would save two functions but I am not sure on the speed gained since normally, the most time consuming part. whether its CPU or GPU. is doing the math from priv key to pub key.

a.a
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
Kangaroo is cracking the discrete Logarythm of the pubkey. VanitySearch is looking for Prefixes which are pubkeys sha256 and ripemd160.

How do you want to mix those?
full member
Activity: 706
Merit: 111
Anybody thought about making VanitySearch search with a public key to decrease the search range to 2^128 like how kangaroo is but looking for prefixes?
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
I could make test with this code in Bitcrack version, it really writes pkey to the output file,

Code:
>VanitySearch-1.15_bitcrack -stop -t 0 -gpu -r 10000 -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000A00000000 1CABDYTie48wXV93XJ4Bdk7MFSTyshTXxg

but how can I make a test with the original version of VanitySearch?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?

I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.

Thanks in what can help me

i repeat this question, please help me.
Thanks,

from my experience there is no big difference, so you can use both OS.

Thanks for your reply. Smiley
Then I will not complicate and I will continue in w10
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?

I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.

Thanks in what can help me

i repeat this question, please help me.
Thanks,

from my experience there is no big difference, so you can use both OS.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 2
How would I create a 128 bit unsigned data type in int.cpp?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?

I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.

Thanks in what can help me

i repeat this question, please help me.
Thanks,
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ...

Code:
./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000

Code:
VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode
[keyspace] start=                                                               1
[keyspace]   end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed]
Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021
Number of CPU thread: 1
GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads.

So how can I force it to start from a random key?
The easiest way without recoding yourself, or using my version, is to create a new start range each time you want to start from a different key.
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ...

Code:
./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000

Code:
VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode
[keyspace] start=                                                               1
[keyspace]   end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed]
Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021
Number of CPU thread: 1
GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads.

So how can I force it to start from a random key?
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ...

Code:
./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000

Code:
VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode
[keyspace] start=                                                               1
[keyspace]   end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed]
Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021
Number of CPU thread: 1
GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads.
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ...

Code:
./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000

Code:
VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode
[keyspace] start=                                                               1
[keyspace]   end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed]
Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021
Number of CPU thread: 1
GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?

I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.

Thanks in what can help me
Pages:
Jump to: