Countries that deny and reject adequate ways of development, the only thing they definitely become independent from is normal life, development, positive perspectives.... As history has confirmed for many decades.
And the difference became especially noticeable after 1945, when the world was divided into the progressive West and the semi-slave East led by the USSR.
PS From the field of terrorism theory: Prince Talal bin Abdulaziz bin Bandar Al Saud died in Saudi Arabia.
And the Kremlin had a very big bet on him, question is his strange death the result of his not making agreements with terrorists from the Kremlin ?
That requires in-depth analysis @DrBee. But, in my opinion, what is called politics is difficult to predict, especially if the authentic evidence is not clear to prove.
It was rather an "unfortunate joke" than a real assumption.... Although. Given that russia often uses murder as a means of leverage, the joke might be true. Regarding assassinations - it's not my fantasy, read how many attempted (successful and not so successful) assassinations there were, and not only on the territory of Russia. Plus, after the failed special military operation and tough sanctions, internal cleanup in russia itself has begun - read how many "high officials" have been suddenly "fallen" recently....
I am interested in the opinion of the respected community ! In case of conflict development, or rather the beginning of a full-scale invasion of Venezuela in Guyana, what consequences await the world economy, namely the oil market?
I am following the news on the internet and it reminds of a similar situation that happened between my country Nigeria and Cameroon many years a ago. There was an oil rich region called the
Bakassi peninsula. It was just on the border between Nigeria and Cameroon. For many years both countries tried to claim ownership of this region because of the oil. There were pockets if conflicts here and there until one of the Nigerian presidents at that time gave it up to Cameroon.
No matter what happens, I want to say that war is not the answer. Innocent lives will be lost because of the greed of politicians. The international community shouldn't sit-by and watch either Venezuela try to forcefully take over the oil rich region or Guyana with backings from the US fight helplessly. Brazil may be dragged indirectly if any conflict ensues. That region would be distabilized and the lives and livelihood of the inhabitants will be destroyed. There is always a blood shedding-free conflict resolution that should be explored for peace to rain.
You all make good points, but in this case I would add not the greed of the politician, but his idiocy and cowardice....