You claimed they don't exist. You can prove your claim by requesting them. If they don't exists, they'll tell you. As far as I know, you're the only one that has made a definitive statement as to them existing or not existing. You can prove your claim so do it.
Where's your proof that Pompeo said bigfoot exists?
Stop for a moment. Think step by step. According to you step one is I claimed the subpoenas don't exist.
1. I claim subpoenas don't exist.
Why would I do this? Is it not a requirement for me to claim something does NOT exist that some one at some previous point in time claimed it DID exist? Or is your suggestion that one day I was sitting alone and wanted to talk about subpoenas not existing randomly? You are doing the logical equivalent of standing on your head and pissing.
Step two
2. I have the burden of proof to prove the subpoenas didn't exist.
You insist, based on "logic" that I must prove the negative.
Reality:
1. Some one claimed to issue subpoenas
2. You and your friends repeated it blindly as fact here
3. I asked for proof they ever existed
4. Seemingly endless excuses and gnashing of teeth trying to avoid the fact that no one can find the actual public court documents anywhere
"Some people" said there were subpoenas, including the man who received such a subpoena, Mike Pompeo.
Stop weaseling your way around the question: why would Pompeo lie about receiving a subpoena?
https://i.imgur.com/P53g4Nh.pngClearly you think the subpoena doesn't exist. Clearly Mike Pompeo stated it does. How do you reconcile this?
Why would Mike Pompeo lie about Bigfoot?
This is an image of Mike Pompeo with Bigfoot, therefore Bigfoot exists. How can you reconcile this?
Stop mongoosing your way around the question.
Clearly you have no evidence they ever existed, because so far your best argument is "Mike Pompeo said so", which is equally substantial as the above included proof of Bigfoot.
