Topic: Vid of Biden admit bribe of Ukrainian Pres. to fire prosecutor investigating son - page 14. (Read 4111 times)

You're so dense. You could have simply said that all along you were referring to the letter implying there were subpoenas for depositions when there wasn't but that it's most likely the document request one exists as the WH and Pompeo acknowledge it exists. You could have had your "win". Instead you've doubled down that NONE exist and now just look like a total fool. Carry on though. You just keep showing everyone that nothing you say can be taken seriously.

Prove none exists by requesting them.

Where's the proof Pompeo said bigfoot exists. A picture is not a statement by him.

So expecting you to prove your premise that these subpoenas were real makes me a flat Earther? Is that what we are going with now? The non-existence of the subpoena is independent of Mike Pompeo. How many months do you need to find it? Just give me a number.

If it existed on the internet, then yes, we would have. Just because something doesn't exist on the internet doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You really have completely fallen into a flat earther type argument where if somebody can't prove something to your liking then the earth must be flat. Mike Pompeo can't be irrelevant because he is the one who received said subpoena, as acknowledged in his letter to the house committee:



What is he talking about if he didn't receive a subpoena? Is he lying or is he wrong. Just answer the question instead of trying to conflate it with Nancy Pelosi, the White House, or Bigfoot.

"Mehhh... I don't have to answer any questions!"

If you weren't a such an empty flapping sack of dishonesty then you would just answer them.


Surprise: its not.

No it is definitely weird, because if it existed I am sure the three of you would not be able to resist posting it here. You are the one holding the premise that the subpoenas exist. Mike Pompeo is irrelevant. The burden of proof is yours regardless of Mike Pompeo and Bigfoot.

https://www.house.gov/

That looks like a "repository for every single piece of information that is "publicly available" and released" by the house. Interesting.

You made the statement that it doesn't exist so prove it by requesting it. I provided you the link where you can do it. It's your responsibility to prove it doesn't exist by trying to request it and then you can prove everyone that has said it exists is a liar. In this case, not being able to prove something doesn't exists simply doesn't apply since you can prove it by requesting it.

As for when, nutildah already showed that some can take a year or more to just show up on the internet and even then it's not guaranteed. It's a public record. They have no obligation to stick it on the internet when it can be requested.

And where's your proof that Pompeo said bigfoot is real. Backup it up.

Its not weird because it likely isn't on the internet.

We don't know how long it will be before it will be available on the internet, if ever. There's not a single repository for every single piece of information that is "publicly available" and released by congress.

However, what is weird is your refusal to accept that Mike Pompeo did say as part of public record that he received said subpoena. Your beef really is with him. After all, he's the one that said this, not me:



Still waiting for your proof of Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real...

You don't think it is at all weird none of you 3 stooges can produce a single copy of a single House issued subpoena related to impeachment issued before October 31st? Seriously, how much time do you need to track it down?  A month? Three months? You give me a time frame and we can revisit it then. Just tell me what you think is a reasonable amount of time to be able to access a public court record related to a presidential impeachment over the internet.



Mike Pompeo said, The White House said, Pelosi said. What does the public record say? We are talking about a public document that is required to be filed in a court of public record in order to be a valid subpoena. What people say is irrelevant. What is relevant is the public record. You can not produce it and you refuse to give a reasonable time frame for producing it, and you insist this is a reasonable logic based argument. Unless I can prove the negative of the premise you have the burden of proof of proving, but can not, then clearly you must be right? What?




Every congressional subpoena is not on the internet therefore I have failed... at proving you can't prove... the subpoena ever existed? Is that what qualifies as logic in your dome?

What a weasel. If I didn't know any better, I'd think he was just trolling us. Unfortunately he is still dead serious in maintaining this ridiculous masquerade of not being able to grasp simple concepts in logic.


Here, this meme is for you.



Guess TECSHARE wins you guys. The subpoena isn't on the internet, therefore it doesn't exist. Oh wait a minute, I forgot about this:



http://prod-upp-image-read.ft.com/74bfe2b8-e465-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc

Why would Mike Pompeo say he received a subpoena that doesn't exist?

Still waiting for your quote from Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real...

The WH letter also acknowledged the subpoena but argued that it wasn't for legislative purposes and that the inquiry was illegitimate so it didn't have to be honored. They're all liars apparently.

Should also be noted that the court ruled in favor of the impeachment inquiry in terms of handing over the unredacted Muelar report so they could fulfill their oversight/impeachment responsibilities.

I think I summarized it pretty well:

Every congressional subpoena in recent years is not on the internet.

Unless you disagree with this statement ^^^, your entire theory has been debunked. 

TL;DR

1. Mike Pompeo
2. I claimed the subpoenas didn't exist before you claimed they did exist.
3. All Congressional subpoenas are not on the internet therefore you will never, ever, EVER be able to provide a copy of any House subpoena related to impeachment issued before October 31st 2019.

Does this about sum up your "debunking"?

Every congressional subpoena in recent years is not on the internet.

Unless you disagree with this statement ^^^, your entire theory has been debunked.

Wrong. Before anyone said anything else, you claimed it doesn't exist and you can prove your statement by requesting it and showing you can't get it. It's a public document as you've said so either they have it or they don't. So backup your claim and request it. It's your burden to prove your original statement.

That's not what I said. I said one was fictional, in reference to your claim about Mike Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real. This on the other hand is not fictional:



It is Mike Pompeo going on record saying he received a subpoena. That's why your false equivalence is doubly false.

This is some pretty sad slinking you are resorting to in an attempt to worm your way out of admitting you were wrong about the subpoena not being real.

That's not how burden of proof works. Your premise is the subpoenas existed. You have the burden to prove they existed. I don't have the burden to prove a negative, that they never existed. Don't ever lecture me about logic again if this is the kind of tripe you are trying to sell.



Exactly, both are fictional! I am glad you are finally with me! Even if I had video of Mike Pompeo saying Bigfoot is real and he's "seent it", that is equally as much proof of Bigfoot existing as when Mike Pompeo says there was a subpoena, that a subpoena existed. That amount of proof being zero of course. What you have here is called a non-sequiter. You can't and won't ever prove the subpoenas ever existed. Admit it.

I'll say it again. You made the initial claim it does not exist. The burden of proof is yours. So here you go. Prove to us you can't get it cause it doesn't exist.
https://www.foia.gov/

Prove it. Burden of proof is on you to backup your claim.

He refuses to answer the question because he would have to admit he might be wrong which would burst the alternate reality bubble he lives in. According to him, everyone is lying and misleading. Schiff. The WH, Pompeo, the media. Everyone except him. Delusion at it's best.

If he did that would be proof of Bigfoot's existence?

No, it is a valid equivalence. You insist the subpoenas exist. You can not prove they exist. You claim Mike Pompeo saying they exist is proof. I say Mike Pompeo said Bigfoot was real is proof Bigfoot is real. You bringing up Mike Pompeo is to the subpoena as me bringing up Mike Pompeo is to Bigfoot. This is an exact valid equivalence. The only false equivalence is your claim "Mike Pompeo said" is proof of anything.

You believed lies. You refuse to admit they were lies, and you continue to defend those that lied to you. You can't prove otherwise, now you are trapped in this perpetual loop of making excuses why you can not now or forever more produce the subpoena.




We aren't talking about a list of 8 other subjects. We are talking about the fact that you believed a lie, you refuse to admit it was a lie, and you continue to defend those that lied to you. You have no empirical evidence to prove otherwise. Mike Pompeo isn't going to help you. Just admit it was a lie, you know I am never going to let this go until you do right? Unless you admit the subpoenas never existed I am going to forever taunt you and Nutilduhh to produce the subpoenas knowing full well you will never be able to produce them, a constant reminder for you and all around you of the lie you live every day.