Topic: Vikingbet.io launched this week. (Read 1459 times)
Small users may already know that they do not need to register on a gambling site that requires KYC because it is not worth the information they will provide. It is better to look for other gambling sites that are not too strict so they can play gambling without verifying their account. The @OP himself may be busy maintaining the site and we don't know when the @OP will be back but hopefully they will be back soon.
When I look at the last post, Look yes, but I don't know yet what kind of promotion. maybe signature campaign concurrently with games also.
I can`t understand. It seems that they are planning bounty campaign, but the same time it looks like that they want to get someone to help with the site only. So the best way is to ask...It does not look really good because most people will think that vikingbet is not really serious in advertising the casino in this forum.
True, this is quite ironic when compared with the casino. They have many games with a lot of providers and licenses, and they have also many payments like MasterCard and Visa. I think they must recruit for new marketing events and have active interaction with people.
You are very much correct that small users will not want to expose their private information just because they want play gambling particularly since they already have an existing account with other gambling site for which they are good with the gambling company. I wish them well with their KYC policy.
I would say that those small users who will pass the KYC is out of their mind. If there's a breach of personal information then their at their loss if ever theit identity would be use to do illegal things. I wouldn't also gamble in their site. Take a look at the op, it's been too long since the thread is posted and the op didn't seem to update the thread and did not even make the ann thread presentable plus I don't see any copper membership that will help make a presentable announcement thread then that means that they are not serious enough to make their gambling site competitive to other gambling sites.
Previously OP was inactive for almost a month then came back a week ago in this thread, now he is back inactive for a week already. Will he come back again to update and reply in this thread in the next few weeks? It does not look really good because most people will think that vikingbet is not really serious in advertising the casino in this forum.
The Know Your Customer policy is not something every site would like to implement. However, they are bound by licenses and laws and regulations and often have no other choice. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the license being revoked by the licensee. That is of course the very last thing you want as a gambling site, especially in the beginning when you are just operating. Experienced gamblers certainly the high stakes gamblers will have no problems with the KYC at least that's what I think once verified, everything is fine isn't it? It only gets annoying when they keep doing it repeatedly to delay payouts.
-snip- Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.
Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.
-snip- Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.
Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.
But we also have some regulated casinos with a lot of users who have gone through the KYC process and gotten verified.
-snip- Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.
Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.
Hello All,
We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
This is one of those policies that could either make or break your gambling website. What are the reasons on why you decided to adopt a KYC policy in your withdrawals? Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.
Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.
Hello All,
We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
Then surely this will be harder for your site to lure and gain supports from players and gamblers here in Bitcointalk.org.We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
Because more than anything else, we (If not all but majority) hates KYC verification specially in small withdrawals because this is not appropriate in cryptocurrency world.
we are dealing with KYC in any chance that our account becomes questionable or at least needs to withdraw big amount .
So yes I'm sure many of us will agree with my statement to not deal wth your site unless you changed this policy .
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The KYC is now almost impossible to avoid, depending on where you have your license of course. Experienced gamblers who play with a lot and large amounts will have less trouble with this. Bookmakers without crypto almost always use the KYC, especially if you play a little more and there have been a few more transactions. I think the reputation of a site is more important, if it's good then the KYC won't be a problem either.
ya.ya.yo!
ya.ya.yo!
Just a clarification, Whenever a Casino includes fiat on there accepted currency, KYC is inevitable for players that will use Fiat in there deposit however there's a maximum amount of Fiat allowed to still not undergo to KYC. Crypto user in this same Casino that accepts fiat is not exempted to this rules in case they deposit on fiat supported Casino.
So its much better to avoid Casino that accepts direct fiat deposit if you really want to be safe on KYC requirements.
The KYC is now almost impossible to avoid, depending on where you have your license of course. Experienced gamblers who play with a lot and large amounts will have less trouble with this. Bookmakers without crypto almost always use the KYC, especially if you play a little more and there have been a few more transactions. I think the reputation of a site is more important, if it's good then the KYC won't be a problem either.
ya.ya.yo!
ya.ya.yo!
Hello All,
We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
No many people are interested in KYC and if that is the policy in your company and your existing customers are complaining then go on with your since I can't tell how many new customer you will get from the forum here as compared to the numbers of your current customers that will warrants you to change your existing policy. Welcome to the forum.We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
and that's a primary reason on why people would simply be skipping out on dealing with this site just because of that sole reason.This is why if your company is regulated then expect
you are obliged or compulsory on following on whats been said or regulates which you should accept the fate that people here on this forum doesn't really like it most of the time.
Hello All,
We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
Not many people are interested in KYC and if that is the policy in your company and your existing customers are not complaining then go on with your policy since I can't tell how many new customer you will get from the forum here as compared to the numbers of your current customers that will warrants you to change your existing policy. Welcome to the forum. We have a policy in our company to collect KYC documents before any withdrawals, small or big.
And yes, we are talking with someone from this forum to help us.
Regards
Vikingbet
For this casino to gain the attention of many anonymous players the KYC requirements on the site should be worked on because not many of us will like to give out KYC documents to the casino just to play a couple of games on a new casino,
Hope to see the admin of vikingbet will attend to all requested comments and suggestions.
Hope to see the admin of vikingbet will attend to all requested comments and suggestions.
I agree with that. The choice of a new casino for many gamblers depends on their preferences, and it is well known that KYC does not rank high on that list. The introduction of KYC was a bump in the road for me, one that I had to overcome in order to continue using my preferred platform. Many popular casinos only require KYC for withdrawals of large amounts of money, as required by AML laws in their jurisdiction. However, Vikingbet has decided to go the other way and request KYC from the start, which is not that popular in the crypto world, so I am afraid it could turn away a lot of potential players.
-snip
what about the vikingbet.se? thought it is not gambling(it is more of like a review website for gambling site) it would be good to clarify whether it is part of your company or not.I think vikingbet should make a limit for this KYC, small players will not even check the casino if they read above information.
I agree, but they might be following a part of regulation from the country where they are operating. this reminds me of a gambling site that created an ANN thread here in the forum where at least a hundred countries are prohibited to access or play on their gambling site.
For this casino to gain the attention of many anonymous players the KYC requirements on the site should be worked on because not many of us will like to give out KYC documents to the casino just to play a couple of games on a new casino,
Hope to see the admin of vikingbet will attend to all requested comments and suggestions.
Hope to see the admin of vikingbet will attend to all requested comments and suggestions.
I can`t understand. It seems that they are planning bounty campaign, but the same time it looks like that they want to get someone to help with the site only. So the best way is to ask.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
Since the company already has an active gambling website, I think it's reasonable to assume they have their own developers. Getting help from someone on this forum has nothing to do with their website imho. The comment that they are in talks with someone here is most likely related to this ANN thread, or maybe they are planning a bounty campaign. I guess we will have to wait and see.
Meaning indeed that the team wanted progress and this is from the help of bitcointalk community.
so lets see what they can bring as the business is just starting.
Truth is, judging by their appearance on this forum, they would benefit greatly from taking advice from some marketing experts. I think marketing is an integral part of any successful business. And it seems to me they are not equipped with the right tools and/or don't have the right experience to leverage the Internet or digital marketing for the maximum benefits. Or perhaps they don't know how to deal with the marketing aspect of running a business. It would make a lot of sense to be more knowledgeable in these areas, as opposed to what we have here, which is just…seriously, what? Apparently, this company does have a custom looking website, but I’m not sure that's doing anything to help the visibility of the name, at least from the audience's point of view.
I can`t understand. It seems that they are planning bounty campaign, but the same time it looks like that they want to get someone to help with the site only. So the best way is to ask.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
Since the company already has an active gambling website, I think it's reasonable to assume they have their own developers. Getting help from someone on this forum has nothing to do with their website imho. The comment that they are in talks with someone here is most likely related to this ANN thread, or maybe they are planning a bounty campaign. I guess we will have to wait and see.
Meaning indeed that the team wanted progress and this is from the help of bitcointalk community.
so lets see what they can bring as the business is just starting.
I can`t understand. It seems that they are planning bounty campaign, but the same time it looks like that they want to get someone to help with the site only. So the best way is to ask.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
About the thread - you are right, it is possible to lock the thread, but it is not good for the marketing. We have a lot of questions right now. And if we will see closed thread - we will add some questions.
Since the company already has an active gambling website, I think it's reasonable to assume they have their own developers. Getting help from someone on this forum has nothing to do with their website imho. The comment that they are in talks with someone here is most likely related to this ANN thread, or maybe they are planning a bounty campaign. I guess we will have to wait and see.
And bounty manager can be the same man, that will support the ANN thread.
Jump to: