Topic: VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST: The Virus Hoax created by the Pharma Cartel - page 2. (Read 762 times)

The fact that there aren't any viruses shows that it is the medical liars who are clever.

so Dr lanka would go out and try to find a non venomous spider and than say because of that 1 species of spider he beleives no spider is venomous(facepalm)

so dr lanka would go out and find someone that has drove a car for 70 years without a car crash. and then believe no car crashes ever happen to any cars/drivers(facepalm)

here is a fun fact for you
spiders and viruses are not clever, they do not have brains to make a conscious decision to not become harmful. what happens is natural evolution where each ancestry mutates and where a spider with all the markings of a black widow but has less venom is still not attacked by others. but ends up living longer because it just doesnt bite large species and thus is not swatted/stamped on as much and so the non venomous version ends up living longer
its not a conscious intelliagent thought. its not something that happens overnight. it happens over many many generations

same goes for some viruses. like the algae one that has been around since ancient times when you analyse the sequence to see what family it belongs to

it didnt just pop up in 6 months suddenly being harmonious. over many thousands of years a variant that is less problematic to the host was able to replicate at such a slow rate the algae outgrows the damage caused. thus allowing the virus to continue replicating longer without killing the host

thus mutation is not a thing that happens after 1 generation(couple days-weeks) this is something that happens over a decade/century/millenia

so to rpre-empt your future flip flops
if you think that sars can mutate within a few months to become symbiotic. then you really are not understanding the facts of life.
and if you think that viruses do no harm then you are very ignorant.

you seem to be stuck in a binary thought of symbiotic or deadly and you think there is no inbetween
you think sars-cov-2 infects people and everyone has no symptoms but then must suddenly die. because you keep ignoring, avoid mentioning the amount of people going to hospital with severe symptoms

'Pathogenic' viruses do not exist

did you even read the pubmed reports

^^^ I agree regarding protocols. Why is it that you can't show any details in any reports that show that anybody followed the protocols?

All that blab. And all it remains is blab, at least until you can show the protocols being followed in the reports. However, since the reports could be lies, perhaps you could point out the report makers, so that we could follow up with them if we wanted to.

I'm not saying these things don't exist in the reports. All I am saying is that you can't prove that they do by even pointing them out to anyone, from even one report. Probably you don't have a clue as to what exists and what doesn't.

and the idiot is now saying he has been saying there are several processes when he was the one saying there is no process because he thought there was no way to identify it because he thought it must be an exosome
then the idiot above thought that 'centrifuge' was the only step/process. and i corrected him once again


what an ignorant flip flop idiot
i was the one telling him the processes.

yes thousands of studies have came to a fore-gone conclusion
they include images of xrays and blood samples that double verify the sickness existed in the subject

and millions of tests have been done to a foregone conclusion(just positive or negative result) without it being a waffly exploration,experimentation, explanation report attached

once a process has passed the koch, rivers. bell and the lab can show they follow the standards/procedure. they can just get on and do millions of tests without having to give blowjobs to idiots to explain every detail every time

they actually have equipment now (for many months) that the labs use. its not just random processes mixed together changing by the second. its set equipment to a set process with set chemicals. (aka a set process)

i know you want a metaphoric blowjob to pander to your ignorance per every test.
and you seem to not want to be happy unless you get millions of metaphoric blowjobs

but thats not how the real world works
once a process has been proved to work, along with sub processes to double check the reliability of the processes (double checking the reagents are pure from contamination. and many other things)

but now you have accepted that process that has been around for the entire time does work. you have to accept that they are doing the tests

because millions of people around the world have taken the test and got their results back

im not sure if your next ploy is to say people are not getting tested because you think no one is getting sick so your trying to next assume all the test numbers are of fake people that dont exist.

but the reality is millions of people have been tested. and got their results
hundreds of thousands of doctors have witnessed the symptoms, seems the xrays seen the test results
hundreds of thousands of lab techs have witnessed the processes

kaufman is not even a doctor that knows about this area of medicine/biology nor is even in a position to witness the patients or the lab processes.

so like i said many months ago
go to your local hospital and speak to the real medical people treating patients and running tests/scans and stop being an ignorant idiot following cultish sites that interveiw people that are not even in the frontline hospital profession. even if they stitch a brand 'frontline' on their coats

so you also aacknowledge i linked you a list of thousands of sequences
so here again just for youhere is just one example
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1798174254
it is full of study notes and references and also includes links to them
take this one
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32015508/
which shows
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32015508/#&gid=article-figures&pid=extended-data-fig-1-uid-3
which is the xray OF THE PATIENT IN THAT PARTICULAR STUDY

now its for you to go check the studies and to understand the details they contain.
because they contain alot of detail.
so go read them. like i told you to moths ago

Seems to me that I have been showing you for more than two months that several processes exist.


Seems to me that not once were you able or willing to show the parts of any record that expressed one of the processes being properly followed to its for-sure conclusion.



The point isn't how many processes exist, or how long they existed. The point isn't even somebody's attempt to follow a process. As Dr. Andrew Kaufman showed, the original Chinese processes for SARS were attempted. Some to all of the steps were followed in part. But they were never followed critically... in such a way that they produced for-sure results.

While Dr. Kaufman didn't go into the step process for Covid - at least not that I have seen - he DID state that the same kind of inappropriate and improper following of the process steps were done for Covid, as well.

The thing that Dr. Kaufman was basing his conclusion on was the reports. Nobody knows what some doctor or researcher does in his fun time. He might even perfectly prove that SARS-CoV-2 exists. But if he can't write it in his reports properly, nobody but he really knows.

it makes sense when looking at your overall post history.

anyways
you said i showed you links recently that showed the steps that must be taken to identify a virus
thus you admit the process exists

previously and multiple times i showed you links to loads of studies of them doing the process
thats what you are ignorant of now

so now you accept the process you can alleviate your ignorance and look at the studies using the process

oh and by the way the process has existed even before covid was a word you ever used in any post on this forum. so dont say its a new process only used this month

Does that even make sense?     

the things your ignorant of is now you admit you accept the process is correct.
you can now go and look at the studies i linked a few times over the last couple months that show the process being done.
you can even see the links refer to extra info like the pictures of the patients xrays and other sampling tests/scans that double verify the specific issues,symptoms of those studied

then you can look at the studies of the koch/rivers/bell passing studies. the ones where it includes pictures of the mice and hampsters they tested it on. which includes other sampling/scans that double verify

..
you been told all this many times and now its just your ignorance and amnesia that is failing you. not the studies..

i know your next game is to just accept the process is corect in this topic, so creating a new topic to go back to being ignorant again.. your post history shows you played this game before
and its getting boring.

maybe look at your post history to see your flip flops from the past before deciding to make a new post

You are so humorous.

All that your links show is that people all over the place know that certain steps must be followed to correctly ID any virus. What they don't show is that the steps were applied, and more importantly, that the steps were applied successfully.

As long as you keep on posting useless info, rather than reports where the steps are expressedly written about as they are being done, you are continually missing it.

However, I understand. You wouldn't know a process-usage if it jumped right up and bit you in the eyeball. And that's the other reason why you can't even copy and paste the parts of any report that show the actual test being applied. What's the first reason? They aren't there.

test reports were shown to badecker multiple times
his amnesia or dimensia is his failing
covid has passed the kosh rivers and bell. and badecker keeps needing to be reminded of it

part of PCR tests include the centrifuge part that badecker keeps crying about is needed
if he actually researched he would know
but ignoring, forgetting and crying is the only reason badecker thinks he doesnt have a report.

its been dubbed an umbrella term covid pcr test as a common phrase not a description
the full common umbrella term is the covid prc testing kit. because it includes many processes and alsomany parts

the rest of the world know its been proven and hundreds of thousands of people have died and had family members witness to the symptoms
many many thousands of doctors have both witnesses the symptoms and also done lots of scans and blood tests and swabs including urine and fecal matter aswell as nasal, throat and even lung broncio lavage (lung fluid) tests.

badeckers ignorance is why he cant find anything
badeckers ignorance is his flaw

badecker gets informed of the results. and for one day accepts it and then goes into ignorance of amnesia mode the next day
his latest effort is that 1000's of test subjects need to be seen as getting sick
well lots of specimens have been infected

labs around the world have done there own tests so while badecker tries to ask for one report that has such specifics. he then cries that its not layed out in simple english
and when he gets the simple english summary he cries that its not specifically detailed enough


what he should find is hundreds of reports with it all containing the info he ignorantly asks for but then deny ever getting

badecker keeps getting stuck on the centrifuge part because he heard in a video that centrifuges are not used (idiots beleives anything on youtube)
so here is the UK government showing that centrifuges are part of the process
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-guidance-for-clinical-diagnostic-laboratories/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-handling-and-processing-of-laboratory-specimens#centrifugation

heres the US saying the word centrifuge several times
https://www.fda.gov/media/137120/download

The point is that the only way to determine if a virus is the culprit, is to do some strict tests. These tests involve,
- extracting some material from a sick subject,
- filtering the material so all that is left is virus-sized stuff or smaller,
- centrifuging this stuff to separate out the various substances,
- drawing off and testing the substances at different levels in the centrifuge,
- chemically testing each group for virus-like reactions (viruses are too small to see),
- growing each separated out material that looks like a virus in a petri dish so that...
- inject the material into several hundred test subjects to see if they get sick,
- withdraw some material from the sick ones (if there are any),
- test this material in the same way the original was tested to see if it is the same material as the original.

Various methods might vary somewhat from isolation and identification of a virus. But essentially, these are the steps that must be done regarding identifying a new virus.

I'm still looking for a test report that shows that Covid was identified this way. If it wasn't, there probably isn't any Covid... at least not that we know for sure. If it isn't Covid, what might it be? It could easily be a strain of some other kind of virus. And it might be lack of sun spots doing something to the atmosphere. It could be any number of other things.

in my country there is news that covid-19 is a conspiracy made to frighten. but I don't see that and the reality is that many people have suffered and experienced death due to covid-19, and have even touched medical personnel who operationally know whether Covid-19 really exists or not. who would want to sacrifice himself because of unbelief which the frontline officers, namely doctors, have experienced.

So I do not believe in the news that says that Covid-19 is a conspiracy and that is very misleading because there will be many who do not heed health protocols resulting in many people being infected and continue to be out of control. sorry for the medical staff who have tried so hard to cope but the crowd is not committed to taking good care of themselves according to the rules of health protocol.

If this is what you really believe, why don't you show the reports that I ask for, the way I ask above? Can't you at least say that here (link) is a basic, foundational report that shows the real trials and tests the way I ask for them in my previous post? Or don't you think that being sure about a virus is important?

you link reprimanded ex doctors who misquote other doctors

i showed you the links to the actual reports.
just because you cant read them doesnt make them irrelevant it just means your asking for things you never want to understand and thus you become more of an idiot by ignoring the info you asked for by saying that you cant understand it

if your not prepared to learn something. then stop asking for it
but all you do is ask and the moan that you dont understand it..
so try to learn how to understand it. do some proper research.. or admit you have no intention of learning. and you dont actually want real answers.

Reports are detailed. The fact that you can't show us the foundational reports, and especially the testing of the new virus in other people, shows that you aren't knowledgeable enough, or that there was never any testing.

Come on. Show us the wording in the foundational reports where they extracted and isolated the Covid virus, and then injected it into a bunch of other people making them sick thereby, and then extracted and isolated the virus from these other people, and found that it was the same as the virus they extracted and isolated from the first guy.

This is so important that somebody must have done it. And you, with all your research abilities, should easily be able to find these original reports - or secondary reports where they did the same - and you should be able to show and explain it to us. Or maybe the reports don't exist?

Notice that I link all kinds of info that is easy to understand. Since research and medical reports aren't easy to understand, please explain them to us... if they exist.

As I have been trying to tell you. It's 2020. We have the Microsphere Nanoscope. It's destroying a whole lot of 20th Century understanding of how the cells and medicine really work. But you haven't noticed that all of your understanding of cells and medicine are founded on 20th Century faulty research.

You can't stop the advancement of the new discoveries... that we never knew what we were talking about all along. And now we are proving it with the MN.

Do you ever wonder why there is so little info coming out about the MN discoveries? The world should be resounding with MN pictures where researchers are saying things like, "This is marvelous. Now we are seeing that we were right about this and that, all of which we assumed to be true by inference, back in the 20th Century."

But if they are saying things like that, it's only a little. Instead, they are rather quiet about MN discoveries. Why? Because they were way wrong in the 20th Century. And they don't know how to break it to the public without destroying their own reputations as people who have had the knowledge.

They are maintaining the lie that they knew what they were talking about. The fact that they now see that viruses are way different "things" than they always though, is one of the things they have found out.

i already linked you the sequencing of thousands
and i even showed you clusters of thousands done one process and also clusters of them done other processes. thus it also debunks your other scripts of a flawed process

different countries have many many many thousands of records of patients. hospitals in local area's use one process for their thousands of patients. other area's use other processes and yet they all come to the same results.

your in ability to read and click links is your problem of your own personal ignorance. so dont blame your ignorance as the reason(you think) the virus doesnt exist. blame your ignorance as the reason your ignorant. because reality is the virus does exist

now change your script because your very out of date with reality

you are returning back to your january scripts again
so here is a reminder. maybe write it down on a post it note and attach it to your screen for future reference

its august 2020.. not january
they have studied sas-cov-2 to know the symptomology and they have got soo many samples now an they sequenced them and compared them they have isolated the virus and then purposefully infected another specimen to see if that isolated pathogen causes the same symptoms and it does. they done it to pass the koch, rivers and bell criteria

there is no need to reboot your january scripts because you been debunked many times now

they know the sequence of the rna they know it is similar to SARS and not ebola and in no way is an exosome
they know its has no evolutionary history of being from a human years ago or recent.. so there is no way it was human biology that has had time to evolve into this strain
its not a illness that is already in people and manifests due to certain environment
emphasis its not something pre-existant in humans, thats triggered
it is a foreign pathogen that infects people and causes illness
the pathogen is of the viral category. and not bacterial,fungal, poison.

so i hope your now back uptodate. and i hope you dont forget again this time