viruses are not exosomes
ebola does not look like an exosome nor have the same biological, enzyme, protein makeup of a exsome nor perform the same tasks as a exosome
corona does not look like an exosome nor have the same biological, enzyme, protein makeup of a exsome nor perform the same tasks as a exosome
i know you think you can pretend to have a brain by using a word no one may have heard of before this last decade. but you are still stuck in 1800 stupidity by your ignorance and inability to understand modern science modern biology revelations and modern medicine
so please just try harder at researching before posting.
Topic: VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST: The Virus Hoax created by the Pharma Cartel - page 4. (Read 763 times)
August 06, 2020, 05:48:19 PM
August 06, 2020, 04:54:34 PM
so many times you got debunked and still you are ignorant
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
So many times you talk as though I got debunked, and still you are ignorant. Know why? You can't even read what I write. Probably you can't even do research.
your calling vaccines a poison and a virus the cure that repairs us..(facepalm)
so yea im calling you a debunked ignorant idiot
Actually, I'm calling exosomes the body's own cure, and viruses simply one of the forms/stages of exosomes.
Say it right... as if you can say anything right.
August 06, 2020, 04:34:44 PM
so many times you got debunked and still you are ignorant
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
So many times you talk as though I got debunked, and still you are ignorant. Know why? You can't even read what I write. Probably you can't even do research.
your calling vaccines a poison and a virus the cure that repairs us..(facepalm)
so yea im calling you a debunked ignorant idiot
August 06, 2020, 04:21:18 PM
so many times you got debunked and still you are ignorant
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
So many times you talk as though I got debunked, and still you are ignorant. Know why? You can't even read what I write. Probably you can't even do research.
August 06, 2020, 04:14:53 PM
so many times you got debunked and still you are ignorant
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
a virus is a foreign entity to your body. that came into your body. thats what an infection is
viruses infect the host to do damage
exosomes and viruses forms are different too corona does not even look like a exosome.
i know you keep thinking that an apple looks like an orange or a golf ball looks like a spikey dog squeeky toy.. but to the rest of the world they are different
they have different purposes.
i know your still stuck in 1800's science. but its 2020. update yourself and to being an ignorant idiot repeating crap in different topics. you have no clue what your taking about and seem to be just copy and pasting the same crap each time without actually learning the details of what you copy
so do some friggen research on the stuff you post and dont just repost other peoples opinions without first researching them to see if they even valid or even worthy of posting
i know you pretend you are not to blame for what you post. but by you posting it. you have to take responsibility for the crap you post even if its not your own original words.
so put some effort and some common sense and some logic into what you feel like posting.
it was back in the 1800's that people thought that bacteria, fungus, viruses were al the same kinda thing. but science has moved a hell of alot further in 200 years. so its time you moved forward with the times too
exosomes are not forign to your body. they are made by your body and they have positive benefit on your body
a virus is a foreign entity to your body. that came into your body. thats what an infection is
viruses infect the host to do damage
exosomes and viruses forms are different too corona does not even look like a exosome.
i know you keep thinking that an apple looks like an orange or a golf ball looks like a spikey dog squeeky toy.. but to the rest of the world they are different
they have different purposes.
i know your still stuck in 1800's science. but its 2020. update yourself and to being an ignorant idiot repeating crap in different topics. you have no clue what your taking about and seem to be just copy and pasting the same crap each time without actually learning the details of what you copy
so do some friggen research on the stuff you post and dont just repost other peoples opinions without first researching them to see if they even valid or even worthy of posting
i know you pretend you are not to blame for what you post. but by you posting it. you have to take responsibility for the crap you post even if its not your own original words.
so put some effort and some common sense and some logic into what you feel like posting.
it was back in the 1800's that people thought that bacteria, fungus, viruses were al the same kinda thing. but science has moved a hell of alot further in 200 years. so its time you moved forward with the times too
August 06, 2020, 04:03:22 PM
I believed most of this pandemic disease is cause or create by some big fish in the pharma organization in other to achieve their selfish purpose but I find it hard to believe that viruses do not exist and what about the diseases caused by human immunodeficiency virus?
With that been said, I did some research about the exosomes you and I believe it has almost the same symptom COVID 19 patient had but is there a cure for the exosomes in other to be sure if the COVID 19 pandemic was just a lie.
With that been said, I did some research about the exosomes you and I believe it has almost the same symptom COVID 19 patient had but is there a cure for the exosomes in other to be sure if the COVID 19 pandemic was just a lie.
It's happening something like this.
In the mid 1800s, doctors and researchers were looking for the cause of diseases.
They had two basic options to choose from:
1. Bugs like bacteria and viruses;
2. Toxins from a variety of places, both man-made, and in nature.
There's money in bugs, especially if you can't see them to refute the idea of their existence.
So, the idea of tiny viruses has existed for well over 100 years with no way to see them (because they are so small) except for the electron microscope.
The electron microscope sees some tiny specks that seem to fit the description of viruses. But they are dead, and can't be seen in color, and can't be seen operating in their host, in the EM.
Then in 1983 some doctors detected virus-sized bugs coming out of the cells, and they called them exosomes.
Then in 2011, somebody invented the Microsphere Nanoscope, a microscope so powerful that it can see viruses (like the EM) but see them alive... living in their host cells... and watch exactly what they are doing.
Since then more and more researchers have realized that the viruses of the past were really exosomes all along, and we simply couldn't watch their processes because of how tiny they are.
The whole idea of viruses harming people is really people living with toxins and poisons in themselves, and their exosomes trying to zealously repair their cells by getting rid of the poisons and toxins.
Our whole understanding of what is going on in the world of exosomes-without-viruses has to be changed because of what is really happening.
Big Pharma knows that it needs to work fast, because people are finding out that the whole virus thing is false, and sickness in general is hooked to unclean living. Big Pharma has to move fast to keep from going down the tubes when this all comes out into the public.
Google "Are viruses real?" And use other search engines, as well. Also, search on "exosomes vs. viruses." Also, there are many good videos explaining all this. But they are often de-platformed by Big Pharma because they are showing the truth that BP is trying to hide.
A website called "AltCensored" (https://altcensored.com/) has many of these deleted videos, but you have to be dedicated to find the ones you are looking for.
The definition of a virus is wide and varied. Think of computer viruses. Stick covid into a computer, and Covid will die. So, to say that viruses don't exist is really not true, because there are many forms of viruses, including computer viruses. What we are looking for is an all-inclusive definition for the kind of virus that doctors say kills us.
Turns out that these so-called killer viruses are simply exosomes in a different stage of "life." Our cells make them. Our cells expel them. Our cells take them back in. Possibly our cells take in exosomes from some animals.
Exosomes are made by the cells to fight pollution. Often our bodies are so polluted that the exosomes forget who the good guys are. The only way to destroy viruses is to destroy us, because we are making the viruses in the form of exosomes for good reasons.
Science has only been figuring this out for the last 4 decades. And it is only within the last decade that they are seeing the complexity of the living system so that they are coming to understand how these things work.
Big Pharma is poisoning us with vaccines so that more exosomes are created by our cells to repair us, which are called viruses, so that more vaccines need to be used, so that more exosomes are created by our cells to repair us, which are called viruses, so that more vaccines need to be used, so that more exosomes are created by our cells to repair us, which are called viruses, so that more vaccines need to be used, so that more exosomes are created by our cells to repair us, which are called viruses, so that more vaccines need to be used, so that more exosomes are created by our cells to repair us, ... and on and on until we all die if we don't fall back into barbarism first.
August 06, 2020, 03:27:14 PM
I believed most of this pandemic disease is cause or create by some big fish in the pharma organization in other to achieve their selfish purpose but I find it hard to believe that viruses do not exist and what about the diseases caused by human immunodeficiency virus?
With that been said, I did some research about the exosomes you and I believe it has almost the same symptom COVID 19 patient had but is there a cure for the exosomes in other to be sure if the COVID 19 pandemic was just a lie.
With that been said, I did some research about the exosomes you and I believe it has almost the same symptom COVID 19 patient had but is there a cure for the exosomes in other to be sure if the COVID 19 pandemic was just a lie.
It's happening something like this.
In the mid 1800s, doctors and researchers were looking for the cause of diseases.
They had two basic options to choose from:
1. Bugs like bacteria and viruses;
2. Toxins from a variety of places, both man-made, and in nature.
There's money in bugs, especially if you can't see them to refute the idea of their existence.
So, the idea of tiny viruses has existed for well over 100 years with no way to see them (because they are so small) except for the electron microscope.
The electron microscope sees some tiny specks that seem to fit the description of viruses. But they are dead, and can't be seen in color, and can't be seen operating in their host, in the EM.
Then in 1983 some doctors detected virus-sized bugs coming out of the cells, and they called them exosomes.
Then in 2011, somebody invented the Microsphere Nanoscope, a microscope so powerful that it can see viruses (like the EM) but see them alive... living in their host cells... and watch exactly what they are doing.
Since then more and more researchers have realized that the viruses of the past were really exosomes all along, and we simply couldn't watch their processes because of how tiny they are.
The whole idea of viruses harming people is really people living with toxins and poisons in themselves, and their exosomes trying to zealously repair their cells by getting rid of the poisons and toxins.
Our whole understanding of what is going on in the world of exosomes-without-viruses has to be changed because of what is really happening.
Big Pharma knows that it needs to work fast, because people are finding out that the whole virus thing is false, and sickness in general is hooked to unclean living. Big Pharma has to move fast to keep from going down the tubes when this all comes out into the public.
Google "Are viruses real?" And use other search engines, as well. Also, search on "exosomes vs. viruses." Also, there are many good videos explaining all this. But they are often de-platformed by Big Pharma because they are showing the truth that BP is trying to hide.
A website called "AltCensored" (https://altcensored.com/) has many of these deleted videos, but you have to be dedicated to find the ones you are looking for.
August 05, 2020, 12:31:30 PM
It's right there for you. And there are a lot more sites where the same things are shown.
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! Trust me, I've seen all sorts of shit out there.
As for your claims from the title of the topic, can you show us some scientific paper published by a respectable scientist in the field of microbiology?
Start by researching Louis Pasteur. Is it true that he didn't want his private memoirs published until his children had all passed? Is it true that in his memoirs he said that he fabricated and lied about the results of his experiments, etc.?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
all information certainly will not always lead to mere lies, because all the news can be traced and explanations can be asked for so that we can trust.
as well as what is said by researchers / scientists who are clear at this time what researchers / scientists say will be accompanied by clinical trials that have been carried out. all can analyze what is written and can not do a lie that can be brightly refuted by other researchers / scientists.
when a pandemic is indeed very prone to occur information that can be misleading, the most often is the discovery of drugs that can cure and are said to have been tried to the sick. but when asked whether there have been clinical trials, they are not able to give, then it can be ascertained that lies are looking for the benefits of people who are already afraid of a pandemic.
And what you say is exactly the reason why we know that there aren't any viruses that have been proven to exist.
Most of the people who discover new things, are working for institutions who pay them the money they need to live. They will do what the institution orders them to do... or starve. The institution owners aren't only made up of researchers who want the truth. They are also made up of people who want to make money.
The desire for more money is the reason why we have all kinds of silly scientific notions that usually destroy themselves right in their own literature, if somebody would only take a look. For example, the idea that the universe is billions of years old, has been said by the basic finders of this information, to be a tenuous idea at best.
Evolution theory says right within itself that there are random mutations. "Random" really means that we don't know. So, we don't know that evolution exists, yet the idea is very popular around the world.
Einstein's Relativity doesn't work at microscopic levels.
There is theory that is way stronger than standard theory, that says that stars are electric plasma, and not nuclear objects, but few people know about this.
Black holes might not be what they are described to be in standard theory at all.
The known universe has been said to be about 13 billion lightyears wide. But now we are finding evidence that it is way bigger. But who knows about this?
In the same way, the virus idea is all about money and control. Viruses never existed. At least that we have factually known. All that exists are exosomes, moving out of and back into the cells to do their work. But if there are viruses, they have far different reasons for existing than medical research has understood.
Just to show you how messed up the greedy medical industry is, see that hydroxychloroquine + zinc has been the cure for Covid all along. But the medical is downplaying it, big time.
Watch a few honest doctors: https://www.altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c and https://www.altcensored.com/watch?v=aX_Q1FaY9pI.
And watch the videos here https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ that prove that the doctors are hones.
August 05, 2020, 11:26:31 AM
It's right there for you. And there are a lot more sites where the same things are shown.
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! Trust me, I've seen all sorts of shit out there.
As for your claims from the title of the topic, can you show us some scientific paper published by a respectable scientist in the field of microbiology?
Start by researching Louis Pasteur. Is it true that he didn't want his private memoirs published until his children had all passed? Is it true that in his memoirs he said that he fabricated and lied about the results of his experiments, etc.?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
all information certainly will not always lead to mere lies, because all the news can be traced and explanations can be asked for so that we can trust.
as well as what is said by researchers / scientists who are clear at this time what researchers / scientists say will be accompanied by clinical trials that have been carried out. all can analyze what is written and can not do a lie that can be brightly refuted by other researchers / scientists.
when a pandemic is indeed very prone to occur information that can be misleading, the most often is the discovery of drugs that can cure and are said to have been tried to the sick. but when asked whether there have been clinical trials, they are not able to give, then it can be ascertained that lies are looking for the benefits of people who are already afraid of a pandemic.
August 04, 2020, 12:32:30 PM
Start by researching Louis Pasteur. Is it true that he didn't want his private memoirs published until his children had all passed? Is it true that in his memoirs he said that he fabricated and lied about the results of his experiments, etc.?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
Yet, you enjoy the benefits of this 'fake' research on a daily basis. Isn't that hypocritical of you?
The benefit of fake research is exposing it. And that is part of what I attempt to do. It IS enjoyable exposing fake news.
What is hypocritical about that? Shouldn't someone enjoy what he does in life. Fake news is enjoyable when one can expose it.
For example. The guy who drives the wrecker truck, enjoys his job. But well over 90% of his enjoyment comes at the expense of someone else who has trouble. If there never was any trouble, the wrecker truck driver would have to find something else to do for a living, and for enjoyment. But he doesn't wish for trouble to come to anyone. In fact, he enjoys helping people who have trouble, in addition to enjoying driving a wrecker.
Same with me. If there wasn't any fake news, I would have to get my enjoyment somewhere else, other than trying to expose some fake stuff that didn't exist. But since it exists, I enjoy exposing the fake news that comes about, and I enjoy enlightening people about the fake news, even if they don't want to be enlightened.
So, where are you at? Are you trying to maintain the fake news that I am trying to expose, and cover up the fact that it is fake? Do you get enjoyment out of that? How about a benefit?
August 04, 2020, 09:41:21 AM
Start by researching Louis Pasteur. Is it true that he didn't want his private memoirs published until his children had all passed? Is it true that in his memoirs he said that he fabricated and lied about the results of his experiments, etc.?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
Yet, you enjoy the benefits of this 'fake' research on a daily basis. Isn't that hypocritical of you?
August 04, 2020, 09:27:00 AM
It's right there for you. And there are a lot more sites where the same things are shown.
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! Trust me, I've seen all sorts of shit out there.
As for your claims from the title of the topic, can you show us some scientific paper published by a respectable scientist in the field of microbiology?
Start by researching Louis Pasteur. Is it true that he didn't want his private memoirs published until his children had all passed? Is it true that in his memoirs he said that he fabricated and lied about the results of his experiments, etc.?
So, who is the credible researcher since all the research is based on lies?
August 04, 2020, 03:56:28 AM
VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST
I wonder who donates to your BTC for spreading fake information
August 01, 2020, 07:10:54 PM
funy part about badecker
is he shows an image of a exosome and even links quotes that its below 100nm average
exosomes are more golfballs shape that attach nutrients. to the outside
corona virus is more spikey ball that hook onto cells to penetrate the cell..
meaning they do different things
a exosome does not hook to a cell. instead it covers itself in nutrient and the nutrient is the thing that a particular nutrient seeking cell receptor likes and sucks inside.
its like the difference between a virus being puzzle piece and a exosome being a toffee apple
also corona and ebola are not only different shapes but also different sizes with both being more then the average size of an exosome.
again badecker is trying to compare toffee apples to spikey dogtoys
is he shows an image of a exosome and even links quotes that its below 100nm average
exosomes are more golfballs shape that attach nutrients. to the outside
corona virus is more spikey ball that hook onto cells to penetrate the cell..
meaning they do different things
a exosome does not hook to a cell. instead it covers itself in nutrient and the nutrient is the thing that a particular nutrient seeking cell receptor likes and sucks inside.
its like the difference between a virus being puzzle piece and a exosome being a toffee apple
also corona and ebola are not only different shapes but also different sizes with both being more then the average size of an exosome.
again badecker is trying to compare toffee apples to spikey dogtoys
That's because the thing that you call a virus is simply an exosome that has been expelled by a cell, making re-entry. It changes while it is out.
August 01, 2020, 03:09:17 PM
funy part about badecker
is he shows an image of a exosome and even links quotes that its below 100nm average
exosomes are more golfballs shape that attach nutrients. to the outside
corona virus is more spikey ball that hook onto cells to penetrate the cell..
meaning they do different things
a exosome does not hook to a cell. instead it covers itself in nutrient and the nutrient is the thing that a particular nutrient seeking cell receptor likes and sucks inside.
its like the difference between a virus being puzzle piece and a exosome being a toffee apple
also corona and ebola are not only different shapes but also different sizes with both being more then the average size of an exosome.
again badecker is trying to compare toffee apples to spikey dogtoys
is he shows an image of a exosome and even links quotes that its below 100nm average
exosomes are more golfballs shape that attach nutrients. to the outside
corona virus is more spikey ball that hook onto cells to penetrate the cell..
meaning they do different things
a exosome does not hook to a cell. instead it covers itself in nutrient and the nutrient is the thing that a particular nutrient seeking cell receptor likes and sucks inside.
its like the difference between a virus being puzzle piece and a exosome being a toffee apple
also corona and ebola are not only different shapes but also different sizes with both being more then the average size of an exosome.
again badecker is trying to compare toffee apples to spikey dogtoys
August 01, 2020, 02:20:05 PM
It's right there for you. And there are a lot more sites where the same things are shown.
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet! Trust me, I've seen all sorts of shit out there.
As for your claims from the title of the topic, can you show us some scientific paper published by a respectable scientist in the field of microbiology?
August 01, 2020, 11:51:57 AM
Like I said. You can research it. Nobody has seen a living virus until 2011.
even with your own warped imagination
you just debunked yourself
we are in 2020
meaning even under your warped imagination they have been able to identify viruses for atleast 9 years even in your own words
(reality is it was 1930's they had visual confirmation of viruses.. but lets stick with your imaginary number as it still debunks you)
so now you can stop pretending no one can identify a virus
i think its you that need to do the research
and stop thinking it the 1800's and you still thinking you have to wait out 200 years of your stupidly thought up immortality before you get to learn the truth
wake up its already 2020.. no more excuses to keep waiting. do the research now. on present things happening now.. stop going back to the past to find excuses to be an idiot
'Nanoscope' makes live viruses visible for first time:
High-tech microscope breaks record for tiniest object viewable under normal light. And with no limit on imaging capacity, who knows what life forms may soon be seen?
Viruses are small. Very small. There are millions of types, and the 5,000 or so that have been studied in detail are typically between 10 and 300 nanometers (one-billionth of a meter) in diameter.
These microspheres collect evanescent waves to form virtual images that can be captured by a conventional lens. University of Manchester
Because the wavelengths of visible light range from roughly 300 to 800 nanometers, viruses aren't exactly visible under normal lighting. Only optical fluoresce microscopes can see inside a virus, and then only indirectly, using dye, which cannot actually penetrate a virus.
So the "microsphere nanoscope" developed by scientists at the University of Manchester's School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering in the U.K. and described in the journal Nature Communications is remarkable on two counts: It breaks the world record of direct imaging under normal lights by 20 times, viewing objects as small as 50 nm wide, and what's more, the tech behind it imposes no theoretical limit in the size of feature that can be seen.
This incredible jump in capacity could allow humans to see inside human cells and even live viruses for the first time, which in turn could give us many new insights into their structures and behaviors.
Viruses are small. Very small. There are millions of types, and the 5,000 or so that have been studied in detail are typically between 10 and 300 nanometers (one-billionth of a meter) in diameter.
These microspheres collect evanescent waves to form virtual images that can be captured by a conventional lens. University of Manchester
Because the wavelengths of visible light range from roughly 300 to 800 nanometers, viruses aren't exactly visible under normal lighting. Only optical fluoresce microscopes can see inside a virus, and then only indirectly, using dye, which cannot actually penetrate a virus.
So the "microsphere nanoscope" developed by scientists at the University of Manchester's School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering in the U.K. and described in the journal Nature Communications is remarkable on two counts: It breaks the world record of direct imaging under normal lights by 20 times, viewing objects as small as 50 nm wide, and what's more, the tech behind it imposes no theoretical limit in the size of feature that can be seen.
This incredible jump in capacity could allow humans to see inside human cells and even live viruses for the first time, which in turn could give us many new insights into their structures and behaviors.
Exosome Size:
Quote from: https://bioinformant.com/what-are-exosomes/
The diameter of exosomes can range from 30 nm on the low end to 100 nm on the high end. Because exosomes have a low refractive index and are less than 100 nm in diameter, the separation of exosomes from similar sized cells and vesicles can be a challenge.
For this reason, the isolation of pure populations of exosomes may involve physical techniques based on size and density, as well as techniques that utilize biochemical parameters.
For this reason, the isolation of pure populations of exosomes may involve physical techniques based on size and density, as well as techniques that utilize biochemical parameters.
Since living viruses haven't been seen until the advent of the Microsphere Nanoscope (2011), why would you think that living exosomes have been seen, since they are proclaimed to be just as small as viruses? And now that researchers know that viruses are similar to exosomes, why would you think that know everything about both? They might simply be extensions of the same thing, doing the same kinds of jobs.
Further in the second article, above, is, "Exosomes have an extraordinary ability to transfer proteins, DNA, mRNA, non-coding RNAs." Sounds like a virus.
Now, if that wasn't enough, try this:
Shocker! Doctor Shows How Viruses Fight Illness by Removing Cellular Toxins.
When is the medical world going to realize that viruses and exosomes do the same thing and ARE the same thing?
It's right there for you. And there are a lot more sites where the same things are shown.
Wake up and get out into the real world. Science is just finding out now that viruses are good guys, and that our whole understanding of how viral illnesses work has always been wrong... mostly intentionally wrong, so Big Pharma could make some more money.
August 01, 2020, 07:49:24 AM
Like I said. You can research it. Nobody has seen a living virus until 2011.
even with your own warped imagination
you just debunked yourself
we are in 2020
meaning even under your warped imagination they have been able to identify viruses for atleast 9 years even in your own words
(reality is it was 1930's they had visual confirmation of viruses.. but lets stick with your imaginary number as it still debunks you)
so now you can stop pretending no one can identify a virus
i think its you that need to do the research
and stop thinking it the 1800's and you still thinking you have to wait out 200 years of your stupidly thought up immortality before you get to learn the truth
wake up its already 2020.. no more excuses to keep waiting. do the research now. on present things happening now.. stop going back to the past to find excuses to be an idiot
August 01, 2020, 07:46:50 AM
I agree that the money Pharmers are manipulating the concept of heath, but I'm not sure that I understand the basic premise of this thread.
Certainly something causes these infections, and triggers the resulting stresses on the body. Are we just discussing the generic name of these entities, or is there a deeper issue here.
Certainly something causes these infections, and triggers the resulting stresses on the body. Are we just discussing the generic name of these entities, or is there a deeper issue here.
badecker read on some stupid site that we are in the 18th century and there is no way to identify anything smaller than the human eyesight. and the only chemical reactions that are possible are using herbs
he hassnt wised up that we are in the 2st century
he kinda knows, but then lets the dumb part of his brain forget again, that they can actually identify not only visually via a microscope, but also through chemical reaction, extraction, sequencing and comparison. and work out whats similar and whats different
they have the rna sequence of corona viruses and they know it differs to ebola or bacteria
they can see that the same sequence is found in people that are sick with a certain symptomology but not find it in healthy people
they can see that the pathogen they find in ebola symptomology differs from those with covid symptomology
they have extracted purified and then put it into test specimens and those test specimens also got sick with the particular symptomology. so they do know what they are looking at is the cause of the sickness
then looking at it and looking at the rna sequence and other enzyme studies they know its not an exosome
heck exosomes dont even do the same job that a virus does
people can keep teaching badecker this stuff.. but he will always forget as soon as he clicks the bookmark to his hotlist of conspiracy sites. because he is an idiot that way.
Oh, franky1. You are so far out of it, that you can't even get down to the basics and show why your religious medical faith is the way it is. You might pop in a link now and again, but there isn't any evidence that you understand anything that you link to.
Like I said. You can research it. Nobody has seen a living virus until 2011. All former virus work has been done by indirect, deductive chemical operations. You can't get a clear answer of what is happening in a complex system like a cell, when all you have is indirect, deductive operations. And all the scientists, researchers, and doctors know this, even though they have been trained to not think about it much.
Science is finding out that for the last hundred years it has been limping along with loads of uncertainty in the whole medical arena. Isn't it time for you to come out of the dark ages, and get yourself a Microsphere Nanoscope so that you can actually see what is really going on?
I'm not serious about you getting a MN. You wouldn't be able to track what you were looking at anyway.
Btw, the life expectancy in some parts of the world in the 1800s was well over 100 years. Once people get into good nutrition and good hygiene, life expectancy increases. Medicine is not good hygiene or good nutrition. Medical leaders might have brought in medicine, but it was their bringing of good nutrition and good hygiene that saved people.
August 01, 2020, 07:41:49 AM
by the way..
in the 1800's (badeckers favourite era) the average life expectancy was ~35
so while badecker thinks that modern medicine is killing people. the actual fact is that peoples health are improving and people are lasting longer because when they get sick they can get treatments for more things than in the 1800
if you know your vulnerable to certain things for certain reasons. then take precautions. stop acting like your an immortal idiot where you think the only thing that can kill you is a doctor
here is a reality check.. i know badecker thinks because of alot of people die in hospital. that it must be the hospital that is the killer its not
its the sickness that made the person want to go to hospital. the sickness kills the person. the hospital is just there to improve the odds of survival if they have the right treatment to offer
having no treatment does not mean the hospital killed them. it just means the sickness killed the person because there is no treatment.
without any hospitals at all.. more would die.
having overrun hospitals because too many sick and not enough beds,, nurses and doctors to spare can cause more deaths.. because then people are not getting any treatment
as for 'big pharma'
treatments are needed. to help improve the odds of surviving and recovering from things that are fatal without treatment.
yes big pharma know this and although they do benefit the sick by improving their survival odds, they charge a huge price.
yes the 'pharma' industry should be nationalised as a not for profit where by their budgets are actually controlled and not wasted.. but pretending that big pharma and hospitals are voodoo and placebo's is just stupid
and i still laugh how idiots will find any excuse to continue being idiots
in the 1800's (badeckers favourite era) the average life expectancy was ~35
so while badecker thinks that modern medicine is killing people. the actual fact is that peoples health are improving and people are lasting longer because when they get sick they can get treatments for more things than in the 1800
if you know your vulnerable to certain things for certain reasons. then take precautions. stop acting like your an immortal idiot where you think the only thing that can kill you is a doctor
here is a reality check.. i know badecker thinks because of alot of people die in hospital. that it must be the hospital that is the killer its not
its the sickness that made the person want to go to hospital. the sickness kills the person. the hospital is just there to improve the odds of survival if they have the right treatment to offer
having no treatment does not mean the hospital killed them. it just means the sickness killed the person because there is no treatment.
without any hospitals at all.. more would die.
having overrun hospitals because too many sick and not enough beds,, nurses and doctors to spare can cause more deaths.. because then people are not getting any treatment
as for 'big pharma'
treatments are needed. to help improve the odds of surviving and recovering from things that are fatal without treatment.
yes big pharma know this and although they do benefit the sick by improving their survival odds, they charge a huge price.
yes the 'pharma' industry should be nationalised as a not for profit where by their budgets are actually controlled and not wasted.. but pretending that big pharma and hospitals are voodoo and placebo's is just stupid
and i still laugh how idiots will find any excuse to continue being idiots
Jump to: