Pages:
Author

Topic: Vod is a liar & extortionist. Get him out of DT! - page 18. (Read 24409 times)

donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Dragonboy: Dude, I never asked to be in DT and I couldn’t give a fuck less about it. I’m literally telling you over and over again to make a thread dedicated to having me removed for my actions so this thread can remain on topic but you keep whining here. Ask anybody dude, the more you derail my threads the more entrenched I become in my opinion that you are a scamming worthless troll the community would be better off without.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
Now the real test: will OG give me more negative feedback and go the way of mosprognoz? Or stick to the original lauda style?

How much do you know about OG and the history of these situations?
Are you really sure you know what you are doing here?

I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...

I know enough from the past yes, that's why I trusted OG's judgment more of less since I had a trust list. What I'm seeing is the same pattern of behavior. Someone who got kicked from DT before, made a come back, then started promoting a trust cult when gaining sufficient inclusions, while refusing to acknowledge any concerns over it. Ring any bells? Although in fairness Lauda's cult started over a year ago, and was only recently bumped this year after sufficiently stabilizing trust. This to my knowledge, is OG's first attempt, but I realise someone could correct me here.

I had doubts that the same problem was occurring as with Lauda, as my assumption was only based on comparisons, statistics and a bit of deja vu, but then OG confirmed it for me with retaliatory negative feedback, same as Lauda's oopsy. Therefore, I'll happily make this comparison, regardless of the past history of his actions, as we are currently living in the present. If he wants to join the exclusive club of discredited DT members who negged me after I confront them on their bullshit, that's his choice, and as someone who missed having a discredited -1, I respect his foolish decision to do so.

Thanks but yes I know what I'm doing, I left constructively critical neutral feedback to warn others (especially newbies or lazy people) not to blindly follow an anti-vod cult, not cos I like the guy (I deeply distrust him ironically), but because the trust system shouldn't be exploited for this by well-trusted members who have the ability to do so - and I'm not the only person to see this. If it wasn't obvious from my previous posts, I was trying to help him save his own reputation here, as were many other people.

All power corrupts, power corrupts all. Fuck trust cults. The stats are going to look wicked on this one.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...

I can't speak for others but that's not really true for me... Og's been at this for years (frivolous trust ratings I mean) while he was still invincible in the old DT1. Lauda's "scandal" was a good excuse for him to pretend like he wasn't using the trust system for personal squabbles.

Sure it is mooney. I identified you immediately as a troll and you couldn’t keep me out of your mouth after that. You have always been obsessed with the idea of trying to bring me down, but here I am still in your mouth, maybe try turning around for a bit.

I do also enjoy that Vod is beginning to claim he apologized to me. Feels like we’re starting to make progress.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...

I can't speak for others but that's not really true for me... Og's been at this for years (frivolous trust ratings I mean) while he was still invincible in the old DT1. Lauda's "scandal" was a good excuse for him to pretend like he wasn't using the trust system for personal squabbles.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I wonder how many retaliatory ratings left by you we could count Vod.

I wonder why we haven't heard from alien civilizations.  But I can't solve that. 

Why ponder?  It's quicker to simply count then ask others to.  :/
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.

Everyone has the same count.   Each time I see another desperate trust rating from OG, I see it for what it is - his inability to convince anyone else of his demons.   :/

I wonder how many retaliatory ratings left by you we could count Vod.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.

Everyone has the same count.   Each time I see another desperate trust rating from OG, I see it for what it is - his inability to convince anyone else of his demons.   :/
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
Now the real test: will OG give me more negative feedback and go the way of mosprognoz? Or stick to the original lauda style?

How much do you know about OG and the history of these situations?
Are you really sure you know what you are doing here?

I would say the vast majority of the animosity towards OG stems back to Laudas extortion scandal where OG stood up against Lauda, and it seems a lot of Lauda's buddies at the time are still mad at OG over it, even some of those that don't much like or trust Lauda anymore...
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
I am ignoring marlboroza for repeating the same question over and over again while not reading my responses, but I'm guessing whatever they are on about is answered in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066313

It is funny to see that OgNasty had to repeat that he ignored me after he edited his post on previous page and placed me on ignore, it is even more fun to see that he posted that after I said that I don't have time go back over and over again to read his posts Cheesy

I am pretty sure he has no clue what I posted therefore there is no need to repeat that I am on ignore  Cheesy  Grin

Actually, what is more funny is that he said he ignored me because I am repeating questions over and over again which he doesn't want to answer, yes, I repeated question he doesn't want to answer with simple "yes or no", but I did ask him new question https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066669:

Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

You are.  I deleted that feedback and apologized.
That was correct thing to do  Wink

I think this captures the sentiment of most users when they read this thread.  Cheesy

Don't be so sure about this  Wink
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I don’t typically go looking for scammers, but when they get my attention I don’t mind adding them to my network as such. I reviewed a great deal of that thread and other references as I advised others to do as well. Being a long thread isn’t an excuse for a thread being invalid, although I guess with that logic I can see why people are convoluting this thread. I hadn’t seen the thread or noticed this user before now, or I would have tagged them already. I get that I’ve been vocal recently about constantly making threads with statistical analysis on this forum being merit whorish and not a contribution to Bitcoin, but I won’t go as far as saying your involvement in this thread is retaliation for it. Perhaps you should do the same. Sad to see you join in to derail this thread which exists to discuss Vod’s constant lies. I honesty expected more from you.

Wait, LoyceV is retaliating against OgNasty?

Or perhaps OgNasty is just being his petty narcissistic self and can't handle even the mildest criticism.

By my count, seven most recent neg ratings sent by OgNasty (including multiple ratings for Vod) are bullshit/retaliatory/personal squabbles.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
I think this captures the sentiment of most users when they read this thread.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 2213
Now it looks like retaliation indeed.

Utilized as feedback reference. Thank you thick-skinned gang leader, it's always good to know someone has a back-bone here  Smiley

I couldn't give a fuck.

Disclaimer: I am handing you another spade, to dig your hole even deeper.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

You are.  I deleted that feedback and apologized.

donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
And I didn't say you stole 500 BCH from the community.  That's a lie too then.

Now you come back at me with more semantics...

Who is the one trying to use semantics?

"When acting as escrow, he stole 500 bitcoin cash from the community."

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I didn't say he stole from me.  That is a lie.

And I didn't say you stole 500 BCH from the community.  That's a lie too then.

Now you come back at me with more semantics...



donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.

You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?  Is that your hope for this thread as well, that it will be removed and everyone will pretend you aren't a liar?  Does my question for ibminer still exist?  I noticed your feedback does, and even worse you lie and claim I called him a thief.

ibminer didn't steal from you.  Why did you lie and say he did, hypocrite?  :/

Did you apologize, like I did?   Nope - that's impossible for a sociopath.

I didn't say he stole from me.  That is a lie.  I also addressed the issue several times publicly on other threads and this one after users like yourself tried to paint it as though I called him a thief when I very clearly did not.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?

ibminer didn't steal from you.  Why did you lie and say he did, hypocrite?  :/

Did you apologize, like I did?   Nope - that's impossible for a sociopath.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I am ignoring marlboroza for repeating the same question over and over again while not reading my responses, but I'm guessing whatever they are on about is answered in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066313

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.

You think you can lie and then delete it and all will be fine again?  Is that your hope for this thread as well, that it will be removed and everyone will pretend you aren't a liar?  Does my question for ibminer still exist?  I noticed your feedback does, and even worse you lie and claim I called him a thief.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54066657

I posted the screenshot of your feedback multiple times now Vod.

Feedback that no longer exists?

Stop being dishonest, idiot.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
He edits posts usually after the conversation has moved onto the next page.  :/
Yeah, well, I don't have time to go back to his edited posts over and over again. Actually, now I have 2 questions, seems OG is trying to say that he claimed airdrop on behalf of the forum but I am not sure because he doesn't make much sense in his replies. I'll bold questions:

Just like you entered an airdrop with the 500btc you were holding for the forum.
Is this a lie?
I claimed lots of alts on behalf of the forum as it was my fiduciary duty as treasurer.
Did you claim byteball airdrop on behalf of the forum?

Just like you entered an airdrop with the 500btc you were holding for the forum.
All lies. Every one.
Is this a lie?
Pages:
Jump to: