Topic: Vod is a liar & extortionist. Get him out of DT! - page 22. (Read 23924 times)

This community deserves better and Vod should be held accountable for his blatant trust abuse and lies. I’m glad some more eyes are looking at this situation. Do better. Vod has no place in DT and he should be pressured to remove his abuse by those who include him. It is not OK to use your good ratings to punish users you don’t like with bad ratings and the list I gave are people who justify their actions with just that logic. You know it’s wrong. Stop making the trust system a mockery and do what is right.

i distrust Vod right now cos i agree and belive  Og ( too much proofs here ) and dont trust Vod

I would have, if not for this:

You got it all wrong. This is something I call reversed psychology, while he is suggesting others to exclude DT members who included Vod, he is actually trying to make those DT members to exclude Vod.
Can you make list of users who are included to Og's trust network but he allegedly wants other users to exclude them? And of course, how many users Og excluded.

That's like finding commond ground, I like it :D

Both Vod's and OgNasty's judgement are trusted by:

And:
Both Vod's and OgNasty's judgement are distrusted by:
(data from last Saturday morning)

I think his quest to cleanse the trust system stops when his personal interests are at stake.  :/

Since my name is on that list, it may worth mentioning that I have both  - Vod and OgNasty - in my trust list.
I am sure I'm not the only one with such settings.

I have to agree with AlexSimion, I fail to find where Ognasty "suggested anyone reading this thread to judge by themselves and do "possible" changes", just because someone disagrees to something it doesn't always have to be a conspiracy or hidden/biased agenda, I personally disagree with what Ognasty did there, I don't think the trust system is supposed to work this way, everyone is free to include/exclude whoever they want, and just because you trust someone's feedback it doesn't mean you agree to everything they do, I include both Ogansty and Vod, I am not even a DT1 member anymore( i asked thermos to blacklist me) and I am glad I did so after seeing all this endless drama, but if Ogansty or anybody else thinks that I am worthy of exclusion just because I include Vod in my trust list, be my guest to exclude me, the same goes to Vod or anyone else who thinks I should be excluded because I include Ognasty in my trust list. I really don't care.

For my list, this applies:

First: I disagree with your wording, but from your perspective I get where you're coming from. For the record: I don't support all feedback left by Vod (and most other users on my Trust list). I agree with the large majority of them, and that's why Vod's still included on my Trust list. If the balance would shift too far, I'd remove said user. But the balance would have to move much further for me to exclude someone.

Here's a full list of users who included Vod on their Trust list (as of last Saturday morning):

So, is he forcing you to do so ? You can use your own due intelligence for excluding and including users here and take it as a suggestion from him ( Check who is childish ). Even explaing the process to include/exclude triggers you to think it as an straight guide to change trust list, which could be due to the baised agenda nothing more.

Strange that I don't seem to find it in his post anywhere him suggesting anyone reading this thread to judge by themselves and do "possible" changes ,and that it looks more like a "guide" for people to go straight and add this to their trust settings.    Must not be seeing it because of my "biased agenda"

He is just suggesting anyone reading this thread to judge by themself and do possible changes, your biased agenda and non-objective motives are reflecting hence stop acting childish and dump.

I did not exclude all of the members listed, so I've added my entire list for those such as yourself who don't want to do their research into my trust network.

Emphasis on the bolded parts .     And since you're having a problem with counting until 26 , I'm assuming this conversation should be over.

I don't care what you do with your trust network and clarified my above post for you since you seem to have issues with me sharing information.

So basically you're asking us to distrust all this people simply because they're trusting one guy you have a beef with .  I have no connection with either you or Vod , but you asking us to distrust 26 people for your childish agenda  convinced me to ~ you.

well, there are a few on that list that i actually believe in....


I have been slowly considering who to exclude with the ~, so far its only been inclusions.

Here's the list of DT members who support Vod's trust abuse with inclusions in their trust network.  I've added ~'s in front of their usernames so they can easily be copied/pasted into your trust settings in order to exclude their networks.  You can do this by clicking THIS LINK, pasting the users from the below list into your Trust List, then clicking update.

~qwk
~Foxpup
~peloso
~ibminer
~Mitchell
~yogg
~hedgy73
~Avirunes
~cryptodevil
~suchmoon
~JayJuanGee
~yahoo62278
~zazarb
~LoyceV
~actmyname
~TryNinja
~Jet Cash
~bL4nkcode
~Lafu
~Gunthar
~xtraelv
~Coin-1
~o_e_l_e_o
~morvillz7z
~TalkStar
~1miau


Here's my current trust network inclusions/exclusions I have not excluded all of the above, and think people should make their own decisions:

theymos
allinvain
Syke
dooglus
molecular
grue
BurtW
TECSHARE
SebastianJu
Trader Steve
-ck
Otoh
qwk
CrazyGuy
naypalm
~Vod
John (John K.)
Tomatocage
SaltySpitoon
~El Cabron
silverfuture
mdude77
Bees Brothers
mprep
Cablez
kosmokramer
~Foxpup
~squall1066
~Xian01
davecoin
Akka
~TheButterZone
philipma1957
kroneko
bigtimespaghetti
DebitMe
Cyrus
~Flying Hellfish
Stunna
~Coinfan
Welsh
~ibminer
~legendster
buysolar
guitarplinker
markj113
~TMAN
~Lauda
~blackarrow
~isoneguy
TookDk
~DefaultTrust
wttbs
MarkAz
frankenmint
~aTriz
FiniteByDesign
~minifrij
~klaaas
~justbtcme
~TheNewAnon135246
~hybridsole
greenplastic
~eoakland
~EcuaMobi
shorena
ManeBjorn
bithalo
~cryptodevil
~suchmoon
mindtrip
Cøbra
Rmcdermott927
~crunck
teeGUMES
~owlcatz
~nutildah
~dazedfool
OldScammerTag
iluvbitcoins
Finksy
HagssFIN
~Hellot
~BitcoinPenny
chronicsky
generalt
yahoo62278
~Zepher
bill gator
MCHouston
~LFC_Bitcoin
~ezeminer
~BitcoinDistributor
~IronMarvel2
LoyceV
~Last of the V8s
~The Pharmacist
~Lutpin
~TwitchySeal
~HabBear
~PrincessStar
~marlboroza
~digaran
~Frij
~game-protect
~Hhampuz
~nullius
~altpool-tech
krogothmanhattan
~Shah954
~Best2Invest
~neotronix
Stryfe
~JmScripting
~anonymousminer
~Hector9
~BitMiner713
~Privcy Foundation
~dragonvslinux

TBH;  even though this isn't exxactly an "on topic" reply;   I've enjoyed your writings and presence.   You are the correct level of a memer.... 100%    



In attempt to keep it on topic:

the abuse of worthless negative trust ratings recently is pretty sickening IMHO.

I could care less about these little minor scuffs I have;  but in all honesty:  they could somehow work their way up the ranks... then it looks completely different.
In that sense, I think trust should have a backwards thinking application;  as in any DT rating you had when that was posted;  should stay... but imagine the SQL DB bloat from just recording that....


I will also make sure it is known that this needs attention as it has been ignored by him who it is directed at: