Topic: Vod - Trust Abuse - Lies - Intimidation (Read 1259 times)

Vod is a liar and abuser.Once he gets catched or called out on abuse its always the same.He turns his attack modus on to protect himself.Throwing hundred of diffrent claims out to change topic and to discourage people to continue on his abuse.
It's also always the same circle protecting themself.
What they use to attack somebody outside their own circle won't be accepted as evidence against their owns and so on.

Lauda's claim is funny cause i remember how Lauda was upset that i just posted the postal code without any other information from a member of his circle and demanded to ban me for that.


Vod is a clear abuser of the trust system.You can see it on my trust profile and his reasoning why he left red trust.He makes up things and clearly has an ego issue.
He delted now also his content from his facebook profil and acting like begging me to sue him and also acting like he gave me his real identity which can be used by law which he has not.
He is not willing and even hiding to give his real identity but acting on the forum like its me who are scared to open a lawsuite against him.
I'm just waiting for a usebale confirmation of his identity and you can be assured a lawsuite against his lies and defamtion will be opened.

I know Vod will come and claim thousands of diffrent things to protect himself and make look like a macho on this forum but still i'm just waiting for him to confirm his identity.



Vod i'm really waiting for you.......why don't you pick the lawyer from Toronoto from who you want to get contacted to provide your identity proof or confirm your identity by sending me a confirmation text via your social media accounts ?


Why are you acting like you are begging me to open that lawsuite against you and at the same time hide like a scared baby who does everything so there is no real proof who you are ?

You are a trust abuser,liar ,manipulator and big mouth.

You want to proof the community the opposite ?I'm waiting for your confirmation so we both can proceed.
Its up on you big mouth



Let's clean ship.It will weaken some abusive peoples position heavily


Maybe i should now also open a thread for theymos against you and your massive abuse according to theymos ?


Btw people claiming Vod is doing good for bitcointalk.
Did you even read his nonsense threads and posts ?
If thats the high quality content bitcointalk is talking about then good night

Can we start locking these fucking threads and move on - let OG and Vod have the penis measuring contest as I got news, you are both acting like you ain't got 3" between you and there will be no winner if this continues, actually I think you will both end up losing here as nothing is to be fucking gained.

Lock threads, use ignore and both of you should fucking masturbate more often, Post wank clarity is a beautiful thing.

It's my definition, not a slippery slope.

Intentional vs. unintentional. No malice was intended, thus it doesn't matter.

No.

Proper observation. Whoever can't find it, shouldn't be in this crypto-forum for their own safety. That's how tech-easy that challenge is, maybe a 2 on a 1-10 scale.

Correct, that's why I excluded all of them. Massive hypocrisy, zero actual care about general doxxing. Maybe they do care about doxxing depending on who the victim is.

---

I called this yesterday as a likely outcome of the bullshit that you're pursuing, now I'm just waiting for Vod's counterpart. This is why you should de-escalate immediately, especially when master thermos has recommended that it be done.

It's not.  

As made up as the incorporation name in his paypal info for ten years.  Check it out.

Not sure why Theymos lets him lie like this, but I guess he has made his choice between OG and I.  Scamming brings in the coin - truth doesn't.  

I never said you were stopping me, I was just pointing out the fact that certain people here are trying to make this thread about everything but his inexcusable behavior. Convenient to latch on toward what end? What coveted prize do I get for pointing out Vod's pattern of years of serial abuse of this user base along with the community's excusing of it EVERY TIME? It is always the same thing, he pretends to repent, makes some minor concession after the damage is already done, everyone says the same brown nosing lines about how we should forgive and forget and "he contributes a lot", then he lays low for a few months and repeats the same pattern of malicious behavior again and again and again.

You can still discuss Vod's behavior but for some reason you're choosing to bitch about me not doing what you want. I happen to think that massive hypocrisy, which you're not a stranger to, is a big part of this whole shitshow. None of you keyboard warriors are concerned about doxing at all, it's just a convenient topic to latch on.

Anyone noticing the repeating pattern of how certain people are trying to turn this in to a a discussion of anything and everything except for Vod's inexcusable serial abusive behavior?

LOL yeah... what other users have you actually negged for doxing?

Well, thank you for informing us of this.


If this is the case, it is not to be taken lightly.
But, as you first said that forum administration told you this, they have probably noticed it over and over, enough times to tell you.
If this is the case maybe we'll have some compelling elements brought up by some other members but I can't understand how it was allowed to happen for that long ?


They both starts with an "i" and end with an "n" but the letters in the middle do change. So .. my deduction is that these words are different.
Wait ... Maybe I know their meaning as well ?
Intention : "Bob is in a room with a gold ingot. Bob wants to take the gold for himself but does nothing."
Implication : "Bob is in a room. There is gold on a table. Bob left and gold disappeared. Bob is a thief."

I maybe pass the test, but I still fail to see why you bring that up ?  


Don't extrapolate then. It only leads to more confusion. I told you to not interpret my words. (not give them another, conceived, meaning)
I can't second degree. If you are unsure of what I meant, please ask for clarification.


No.
All you are saying is how you heard it.
Or maybe I missed something else and now you speak on behalf of the community ?


The forum fixes itself very efficiently.

You do realize that "intention" and "implication" are different words, right?
I'm not trying to tell you what you meant with your words, and it is quite off-putting how combative you are being when I am doing everything I can to understand what you're typing and respond reasonably.
All I was saying is how it was heard.

Extrapolating the things you say results in the conclusions I have responded to.

Within 24-hours of removing Vod from my trust-list and leaving them a negative feedback for DOXing another member I have went from 9-inclusions to -1 inclusions and being off DT.
This has happened to multiple people that have acted appropriately in response to the situation.

I've seen all I need to see, to know this isn't going to fix itself.

He's even encouraged people to harm users here by breaking their windows in the night until their insurance deductibles bankrupt them.  He seems fixated on using other people's homes as a way to target them.

Well, if this is true, this is another issue.
Can someone confirm this ? I sincerely doubt Cyrus and/or Theymos will confirm or deny.
Until then, I am very sorry but I haven't witnessed that and you are the first telling me this.


Yes, you are certainly in my head, reading my thoughts.  
I don't need to imply stuff, I just say it.


I wasn't aware that I played a role in a netflix serie

I asked you a question in return, I did not claim "yogg said..." You certainly implied it though, yes.


You're reminding me of a good Chappelle joke.

_{Source : https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/03/146581/dave-chappelle-netflix-standup-special-rape-joke}

I hope the fact I never resorted to doxxing TMAN or owlcatz despite the awful things they've said about me over the years is in itself a little more commendable now.  

That's a more slippery slope than meriting based on exclusively effort.


That's sort of the problem, champ!



Saving a criminal that wants to do one of our members harm some time. How is that a neutral action?


So close, it's just that the "it doesn't matter" part kind of kills it.
You do not know the investigative capabilities or routines of whoever downloaded and saved that information.
Admitting that the information is now in the hands of more people, none of which have good-intentions confuses me how you can come to a conclusion like I'm exaggerating.


It's definitely not being removed. If I shortened it down to just "Posted DOX" - do all of your complaints about my involvement in the situation disappear (the complaints that are able to be solved, moving forward, anyways)? That's an honest question, rather than an offer, but I do take everything said into consideration when I do anything around here.

I disagree that they laid it out nicely, they seem to have pushed the issue closer to a "who cares?", which isn't appropriate.


Now you're the one exaggerating.

Removing it rather quickly was appropriate. It was an acceptable mistake, the DOXX was unecessary (fact being that everyone can find it anyways makes it acceptable). I'm suprised that some rando-pajeet managed to create so much trouble. This escalated several times over.

I agree as we should all be seeking higher standards. Also, I do not believe that the said "higher standard" is an excuse to act that way.
Honestly, I believe that mistakes happens and that Vod had a momentarily lack of clarity. It happens to everybody, even the bests.

Has it happened already in the past ? Not as far as I can tell.
The situation will also be very different if it happens that Vod doxes another member again in the future.

I still believe Vod brings more good than bad to the forum.


Is this what I said ? Please can you point me to where I said this ?
This is not what I was saying. I was saying that Vod's actions were more beneficial overall for bitcoin and the community, and that making a mistake is not a reason for removing it all.

Please do not interpret my words. I am loyal only to myself and my sense of morality.

That's exactly what I said.


Without Vod, we are lost? It sounds like you're the one that has conflicting loyalty.


They would not be the first trusted, or staff member to fall from grace.


Then you aren't paying attention.

Not accesible by public means, e.g. only certain people (say collectors) have it. This is not the case with Og, never was.

I frankly couldn't care less whether he mentioned it or not. If someone had any intentions with those details prior to knowing about the funds, Vod maybe saved them a couple minutes of reading.

Yes. No, and it doesn't matter. People with real bad intentions didn't need Vod's post, and even with the post they're would want to validate the information (the methodology would be very similar to if they were searching for it to begin with).

Rewrite or remove the rating would be a starter. Moronbozo laid out the issue nicely, and don't even get me started on rmc. He's the Chumlee of this forum. If I were to call you an inconsistent hypocrite, he would be the inventor of hypocrisy. Note: I didn't even start.

That is nonsense. Vods "contributions" do not give him an excuse to act this way. If anything he should be held to a higher standard because others will look to him for how to behave because of his standing.