Define "relatively private".
The way you're wording this makes it sound like Vod mentioning there being 500 BTC involved was irrelevant to the magnitude of malicious intent being expressed.
Let's keep it simple, do you believe it's reasonable to think there is someone that has OG's information, or a new piece of OG's information that they didn't have prior to the DOX release?
Let's assume you're going to be honest and say "yes, of course someone downloaded his information that was too clueless to otherwise find it."
Do you think anybody that saved his information from that post has good intentions?
The biggest claim against me is "exaggeration", so let's boil it down to the most reductionist level we can. How should this event be viewed?
Your argument is that Vod has done good, therefore Vod can do evil.
I've seen this argument used to defend Lauda in the past; I don't buy it.