[VUC, CHC, SIGT] 🚀 mining-enthusiasts.net - 0.25% - NEW ALTCOINS! - page 2.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: apphero on August 24, 2017, 01:05:20 PM

Hello
Please check your SIGT pool user kane777 he came when block found and running for a few minutes and he gone.
He do this every time this is not fair for lower hash rate. Right now our friend move to other pool we can't stay with this user.

I have banned several of the users with this behavior, although they can create new accounts anytime 😕
I’ll be investigating a PPLNS payout system to make the issue go away for good. Thanks for reporting and your support, hope to see you on the pool again!

apphero

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Hello
Please check your SIGT pool user kane777 he came when block found and running for a few minutes and he gone.
He do this every time this is not fair for lower hash rate. Right now our friend move to other pool we can't stay with this user.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 02:19:35 PM

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:56:00 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 10:53:52 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 09:42:17 AM

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare.

I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so?

As I said, that person is probably renting time to mine with huge hash power, getting the majority of shares, then leaving until a block has been found. Thus getting an huge amount of the block reward. While everyone can do this and its a 'strategy', do you suggest banning that user?

So what you're essentially saying is, I can mine for only a few minutes of a round, considering I have the highest hash rate, and still receive the majority of shares, even if the round took let's say an hour? If that is the case I wouldn't call this a strategy, rather a flaw/loophole or exploiting the system. Is this happening only on mpos driven pools?

No, this could happen on any pool that uses the proportional payout system - proportional as in you get a proportional part of the block reward in regards to how many shares you've submitted.

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:56:00 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 10:53:52 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 09:42:17 AM

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare.

I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so?

As I said, that person is probably renting time to mine with huge hash power, getting the majority of shares, then leaving until a block has been found. Thus getting an huge amount of the block reward. While everyone can do this and its a 'strategy', do you suggest banning that user?

So what you're essentially saying is, I can mine for only a few minutes of a round, considering I have the highest hash rate, and still receive the majority of shares, even if the round took let's say an hour? If that is the case I wouldn't call this a strategy, rather a flaw/loophole or exploiting the system. Is this happening only on mpos driven pools?

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 10:53:52 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 09:42:17 AM

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare.

I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so?

As I said, that person is probably renting time to mine with huge hash power, getting the majority of shares, then leaving until a block has been found. Thus getting an huge amount of the block reward. While everyone can do this and its a 'strategy', do you suggest banning that user?

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: Krisso on August 23, 2017, 10:48:29 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 09:42:17 AM

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare.

I think you missed my point. I do not want to know the identity of the user. The point I am trying to make - there is an anonymous user that constantly gets 70-80% of the round shares, yet, I DO NOT see him in the Pool list ever mining. He would show up there, not so?

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: jp1981 on August 23, 2017, 09:42:17 AM

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Under now circumstances will we share account names of users who have chosen to remain anonymous within the system. We had several miners connect and mine within the range of 15 - 100GH, those people most probably have bought computing power and directed it towards our pool for a specific period of time. This is not uncommon and you can chose to do this yourself if you have the BTC to spare.

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Hi

on the SIGT pool, who is the top anonymous user?
I never see an anonymous user at the top with the highest hash rates, yet he gets the highest share rate, by a mile.
I also then thought it might be ALL anonymous users combined, but that is not the case either.

@72% Round shares, that user should be mining at 17-18GH, but I dont see that user.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: deuce9 on August 20, 2017, 10:13:28 AM

Can you explain why there is a 5 CHC fee when withdrawing? That seems completely absurd.

The rational is very easy to understand: We want to encourage and grow loyal miners. Thus, you should be using auto-payout which has the low and normal fees and deposits your funds to your wallet automatically. This means a) the funds go out of our system and our wallet does not have to carry unnecessary amounts of SIGT (good if DDos attachks or hacks happen) and b) users get their funds and don't forget about them, causing us less work and maintenance in the long run.

Just enable auto-payout, set it to a reasonable amount and mine a bit and you'll get your funds and circumvent the 5 SIGT fee - makes sense? For us it totally does.

deuce9

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Can you explain why there is a 5 CHC fee when withdrawing? That seems completely absurd.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

All systems running fine, maintenance done. Thanks for your continuous support and happy mining!

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: Neurolicious on August 15, 2017, 03:02:47 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 09, 2017, 07:07:53 AM

We have just added Virta Unique Coin - https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/virta-unique-coin/ with low fees!

Happy mining https://mining-enthusiasts.net/vuc

miner is unable to connect to port 3034

Just ran tests and looked at the system status, stratum is definitely available and running:

ccminer-nist -q -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://mining-enthusiasts.net:3034 -u XXX -p XXX

Other miners are running too - sure you don't have connectivity issues?

Neurolicious

full member

Activity: 309

Merit: 100

Quote from: Krisso on August 09, 2017, 07:07:53 AM

We have just added Virta Unique Coin - https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/virta-unique-coin/ with low fees!

Happy mining https://mining-enthusiasts.net/vuc

miner is unable to connect to port 3034

MATHReX

sr. member

Activity: 861

Merit: 281

Quote from: Krisso on August 07, 2017, 03:54:09 PM

Quote from: MATHReX on August 07, 2017, 02:16:40 PM

Thanks for the information, and even for me, the website is running too slow right now. Probably a lot of traffic is coming your way and servers just can't handle them? Even if the website loads, it's showing very low hash rates for all of the workers.

We are working on it - someone finds it funny to DDOS our servers for some reason.

Thanks for the update and I'm pretty sure this is the best mining pool for SIGT. I'm already spreading awareness for this pool on other platforms. Keep up the good work.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: jp1981 on August 09, 2017, 03:16:26 PM

All blocks are orphaned on vuc?

There was an issue with the wallet lagging behind the main block chain that has been fixed. Additionally the current blocks are very low difficulty and thus increasing the chance of other pools finding a valid solution too. It’s basically a race of who submits it first - orphans are unfortunately expected in this early stages of the coin.

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

All blocks are orphaned on vuc?

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

We have just added Virta Unique Coin - https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/virta-unique-coin/ with low fees!

Happy mining https://mining-enthusiasts.net/vuc

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

@Krisso what is the TX fee for? I've noticed it's 5 coins each time. Is this correct?
Nvm. I see it's a on-demand TX fee.

jp1981

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: Krisso on August 08, 2017, 06:05:30 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 06:02:01 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 08, 2017, 05:02:58 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 04:43:19 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 08, 2017, 03:59:48 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 03:57:45 AM

Thanks @Krisso

Did anything change on the var diff side of things?
Individual Difficulty is a lot higher on your pool compared to others. Started about 45 min ago. I received timeouts and then it reconnected. But since then the diff is up by a lot.

Yeah we tweaked the diff settings to lower share submission rates and bump share difficulty - which should end up being the same reported hash rate as you're just submitting more difficult shares. Could you report your numbers after you let your rigs mine for 15 minutes? That would help - so we can make manual adjustments

Well, I am seeing quite a few shares not being accepted

accepted: 6/7 (diff 3.519), 48.47 MH/s booooo

I find if the difficulty is very high and something goes wrong connection wise, whatever you worked on might be invalid?
Inst there less margin of error if the difficulty set to lower?

Or let me rephrase, is there a benefit of having a higher difficulty oppose to a lower one?

CHC has been very stable for weeks, would be great if we can get SIGT stable too

Thanks for all the effort.

Tested a bunch more and lowered the target time some more - we want to stick to these numbers for now. Miners and hash rates are looking good overall.

Ok. My hashrate is definitely down from 265/270 to 234. Will let it run for a bit longer but doubt it will make a difference.

Don't forget block difficulty went up too, there are several factors for fluctuating hash-rates.

I switched to a different miner this morning. All is back to normal on my side after switching back to the previous miner version.

Krisso

member

Activity: 72

Merit: 10

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 06:02:01 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 08, 2017, 05:02:58 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 04:43:19 AM

Quote from: Krisso on August 08, 2017, 03:59:48 AM

Quote from: jp1981 on August 08, 2017, 03:57:45 AM

Thanks @Krisso

Did anything change on the var diff side of things?
Individual Difficulty is a lot higher on your pool compared to others. Started about 45 min ago. I received timeouts and then it reconnected. But since then the diff is up by a lot.

Yeah we tweaked the diff settings to lower share submission rates and bump share difficulty - which should end up being the same reported hash rate as you're just submitting more difficult shares. Could you report your numbers after you let your rigs mine for 15 minutes? That would help - so we can make manual adjustments

Well, I am seeing quite a few shares not being accepted

accepted: 6/7 (diff 3.519), 48.47 MH/s booooo

I find if the difficulty is very high and something goes wrong connection wise, whatever you worked on might be invalid?
Inst there less margin of error if the difficulty set to lower?

Or let me rephrase, is there a benefit of having a higher difficulty oppose to a lower one?

CHC has been very stable for weeks, would be great if we can get SIGT stable too

Thanks for all the effort.

Tested a bunch more and lowered the target time some more - we want to stick to these numbers for now. Miners and hash rates are looking good overall.

Ok. My hashrate is definitely down from 265/270 to 234. Will let it run for a bit longer but doubt it will make a difference.

Don't forget block difficulty went up too, there are several factors for fluctuating hash-rates.

Topic: [VUC, CHC, SIGT] 🚀 mining-enthusiasts.net - 0.25% - NEW ALTCOINS! - page 2. (Read 11346 times)