Pages:
Author

Topic: vulnerability of the forum. slander in plagiarism - page 2. (Read 2029 times)

copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
You don't have to accuse so categorically.
My bad.

Quote
There is no disorder, the more complete.
I believe you. 

Quote
After I was appointed as a moderator, the situation in the Russian section improved. And users talk about it.
Great job.

Quote
By the way, I helped theymos in the investigation of this case. And provided evidence that the case with chimk is a hoax.
Thank you.
Side note: I/anyone else who cares about the forum, would do the same.

Quote
It's just unpleasant when people say that. Unjust words.
Indeed.



I was about to the response xandry. After looking at this post, I have decided not to post it (code here) anymore. Seems like - I am playing the role of the devil's advocate here.
staff
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2347
Honestly speaking - from outside, the Russian section seems a mess. A total mess. It could be a better place than it is now. Seems like mismanagement is killing the section.

You don't have to accuse so categorically. There is no disorder, the more complete. Xandry long was alone. After I was appointed as a moderator, the situation in the Russian section improved. And users talk about it.

By the way, I helped theymos in the investigation of this case. And provided evidence that the case with chimk is a hoax.

I'm writing this not for praise. It's just unpleasant when people say that. Unjust words.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
It's blocked. This is the middle of the story.
Good to know. One solved. I am sure the user is around and trying to figure out the next pathetic trick.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 814
inbizin = bitkoinguru$$$

I wonder what action will be taken against the act inbizin done? Will they get a ban or they will be living free?  

It's blocked. This is the middle of the story.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.40910122
Thank you for participating.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
inbizin = bitkoinguru$$$

I wonder what action will be taken against the act inbizin done? Will they get a ban or they will be living free?  
I also wonder why the Russian section is rising so many questions. Do all these have any connection with the mod xandry. Seems like these people are very much loved by the mod.
I also wonder how can xandry not notice a topic that was specifically created for him, I mentioned him 100s (+- a decent number) times with his name everywhere but he noticed it after 29 days later or so!.  
I have read this thread only today, thanks to user ToTheMoon_XOM9IK
A silly excuse, isn't it?
I also wonder why not many member actually did not want to talk against xandry. When you do not get support then obviously you take defensive steps that's what I did, sorry I was tired of making more enemies. I locked that topic.

Honestly speaking - from outside, the Russian section seems a mess. A total mess. It could be a better place than it is now. Seems like mismanagement is killing the section.

By the way chimk, congrats on getting back your account. You have hell lot of bravery in you. Good job.
I'm overwhelmed by the possibility of new attacks on me. Please consider the level of aggression on me.
I am sure you will handle it smoothly.

PS: I think I will unlock the topic again just in-case anyone wants to make any comment after reading the whole topic and the conversations. Here you go: [staff] xandry: may I ask an explanation? Response received!
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 814
Thanks for the help. I'm overwhelmed by the possibility of new attacks on me. Please consider the level of aggression on me.
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348
Obviously anyone caught copy/paste spamming should be banned with almost no exceptions.

With the above being said, the current solution in which users are caught copy/paste spamming and are banned in akin to "wack-amole" and is not sustainable. The incentive to copy/paste spam (and otherwise make low effort posts) needs to be removed, while freedoms of "rule abiding" members needs to be maintained.

In an ideal environment, the risk of creating copy/paste posts will outweigh the potential rewards of doing so (the potential payout from bounty/signature deals), and thus, few enough few enough people will engage in this behavior, so much more effort can go into each investigation.

These spammers are getting more creative in hiding what they do, are likely using bots, and will only get more sophisticated over time. This problem is not unique to copy/paste spam, and is an issue in regards to all low effort posts.

I think I might be close to having a proposed solution, however I am still brainstorming.

After stalking at inbizin's profile and merit history I found out that xandry (staff in Russian board) almost gave 103 Merits to inbizin' s posts (almost all of posts that received merits has been deleted) in the last 120 days. I don't know if this is a fair distribution of Merits but I smell something fishy around here.  Roll Eyes
This is something that should be looked into. The posts publicly available of inbizin that received merit from xandry appear to be reports of copy/paste spam. xandry seems to have given a lot of merit to users who have posed in what appears to be a thread to report copy/paste spam. So it may well be a case in which inbizin discovered how to get a lot of merit by making a very specific type of post.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 327
Politeness: 1227: - 0 / +1
After stalking at inbizin's profile and merit history I found out that xandry (staff in Russian board) almost gave 103 Merits to inbizin' s posts (almost all of posts that received merits has been deleted) in the last 120 days. I don't know if this is a fair distribution of Merits but I smell something fishy around here.  Roll Eyes

Sorry for interrupting OP.  
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
After investigation, and with help from the rest of the mod team, I've determined that inbizin = bitkoinguru$$$. He created that blog post (registering the domain in June) and then made that post in Meta in order to frame you. The moderator who actually did the banning was not a Russian moderator, but was acting upon what seemed to be a clear case of plagiarism. The thought of this type of attack had occurred to me before, but this is the first time that it's actually been done successfully. I'll have to think about countermeasures.

You're unbanned. Sorry about that.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
1. This topic discussed the situation with MERIT in the Russian section. They deleted my messages, including the message for which I received MERIT. These messages were directly related to the topic. I asked the question: - Who deleted the messages? the moderators did not respond.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39949683
I asked a question to the moderator xandry
why did he give MERIT to the malicious intruder inbizin and why does he protect him? There was no answer.
 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41191938
I described this situation here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41191768
eaction did not follow.

This is the worst suspicion. I hope that this is not so.

2. inbizin
created more topics
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31764266
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39494173
they have a lot of suspicions of plagiarism, which is translated from English. I conducted an investigation and wrote about it. These are contests, the authors of the texts were under suspicion.
Xal0lex
also suspected what was happening in them
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41177917

3.  Alex_Sr  
participant of those competitions, also has a lot of MERIT from the moderator xandry. he wants to become a source of MERIT. He was also in sight. He hinted at me to the illegitimacy received by me MERIT in the subject.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41202820
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39949683

4. Spotika4
I was accused, for what I wrote to global moderators and insulted.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41183297
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41194419
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41197625

5. In the Russian section, there were a lot of abuses with MERIT and multi-accounts, I was investigating these abuses and wrote about it.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41222108
.
Many people openly, ignore the rules and condemn those who defend them. There is not enough of a can with red paint, for painting TRUST.
in April, I proposed to put things in order in the Russian section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34417861
I took an active part in the life of the forum. Theoretically, my enemy could be anyone who is not interested in changes.
Thanks for the help. Sorry for the bad english. I will learn.

P.S. I always wrote only my own texts. I have an account on steemit there also, you can not publish other people's texts. I understand this well. Maybe there will be more attempts to discredit me.


administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
hello.
I'm blocked for plagiarism, this is a false accusation, I have 100% proof, my innocence.
my account
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile
I'll tell you everything in order.
1.   In the Russian section, in June, there were election of candidates, for the role of a source of merit.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--4391537
I paid attention to the list of candidates, I studied them and they aroused my suspicion. They ignore or dislike the BTC. They love only merit and bounty. All their activities, from the first days on the forum, boiled down to the production of merit. I studied their biography and created a meaningful post about their inadequacy for the source of merit.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39577080
This post caused a resonance. These are dishonest candidates, but they began to defend and there was a dispute. These elections were stopped.

2.   I created a topic for attracting to the elections a source of merit, bitcoin enthusiasts, ideological people.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39949683
One of the former candidates
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/inbizin-1416871
wrote a report to the moderator on this topic, said that it should be deleted. I deleted his post.
I decided once again to look at his publications on the forum. I was very surprised that he hated bitkoyn, wrote that he would cost $ 1, that bitkoyn died and at the same time he published big articles about BTC. I spent the whole night studying-it's plagiarism. And I wrote about this post in the META section.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.40910122
This author not only wrote plagiarism, he taught it to do for the purchase of measures.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28954596
create multi accounts.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-2818398
He gives the measure for the copy paste.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35923589

3.   After this user was blocked, in the Russian section his friends accuse me.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41183297
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41194419
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41197625
The moderator said that this user should be given a warning.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41138684
It surprised me, it's a malicious intruder. This moderator gave 102 merit to this user. I wrote about this post in the META section. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41191768
I asked the moderator a question in the Russian section, why he protects the fraudster, the moderator did not respond.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41191938

4. my account was blocked by a complaint that was in this place.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41295245
. The author registered, created 3 posts, wrote a complaint to me, and then edited it, removing the complaint on my posts.
He repeated my style of filing a complaint, highlighting the DATE OF PUBLICATIONS in bold text. In this he made a mistake. I can prove that this is a fake, in order to deceive the administration of the site, calling my author's articles plagiarism.
He pointed out the reference to the "original" article on December 20, 2017, my article was written on December 22, 2017.
My article on December 22, 2017.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26776196
Article on the site December 20, 2017
http://combats.pw/wordpress/2017/12/20/bitcoin-krepkii-oreshek/
http://archive.li/F424Q
Please note IMPORTANT! In my article I quote the BTC rate of $ 14,500 and the state of the Crypto currency market on December 22, 2017, the capital outflow is 150 billion. On December 20, the BTC rate could not be $ 14,400, the rate was $ 16,000-17,000. The outflow of capital of 150,000,000,000 occurred on December 22. December 20 has not been a fall of the market! On December 20 this article could not be written. This is a fake, someone took my article from the forum and posted it on the site, changing the date, and then wrote a complaint against me, after my blocking removed the complaint.

I registered on the site in October 2017. In December, the rate fell. December 22, I was very worried at night because of the fall of the course and in the morning I wrote this article that I would find the strength not to sell bitcoin and support other investors

5. In that complaint, there were 3 points of charges, the next paragraph
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25879836
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25751142
The topic is called "Tatarstan is injecting the blockchain". I live in Tatarstan, Russia. I wrote critical communications because I understand that a corrupt, authoritarian regime will never make decentralized blockchain, which means that this blockchain will not benefit ordinary people, and only the state will benefit.
This I began to understand very well when I saw the video of Andreas Antonopoulos
"Why is bitkoyn important, but not blockchain ?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSLoOHNC0Kk&t=0s&index=16&list=WL
I wrote a lot of critical posts on the forum, about the use of blockchain by state and banking structures, I do not believe them. And these posts, too, I wrote They are mine. Someone also took them from the forum and posted all my articles on one site, changing the date.
Here I am criticizing the conference on which civil servants on the block chain.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35039496
Here is sarcasm about the implementation of block chain by the officials of the IMF
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34989467

6.   I wrote this post, of course, myself.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--2414960
I'm HODL, this is my style, and I wrote it in the morning, the cheater changed the date for 1 day, while the forum symbol, replaced with the abbreviation BTC. If I were copying, why would I change the abbreviation to a symbol? Of course, this proves indirectly.

What for to me at different times, 4, 6, 21, December, 22, to take posts from one site? This is strange…

The main proof is that the price of bitcoin is not on December 20. The swindler does not understand the market and he did not understand this nuance.

P.S.  this person created a new account and confessed in the Russian section, which slandered me by deceiving the moderators.
this is silly. Why did he do it? Maybe he wants to portray me.
http://archive.li/75rp1
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.41349761
This is similar to the vulnerability of the forum. The scammer can take the original text from the forum, post on his website changing the date and write a complaint, and also delete it by editing it. We need to study this problem.
I ask you to read everything carefully. I get revenge scammers from the Russian section, there is a complete mess. Please unblock the account, support me.
I wrote an appeal, but there is no answer for two days. Appeal sent an email. The theme name is "From user bitcointalk chimk".
Pages:
Jump to: