Is the only way to get a Little BFL through the upgrade process or can they be ordered individually?
You can order Little Single without upgrade process - http://www.butterflylabs.com/pre-order-form-bitforce-little-single-sc/
Topic: ["WAIT LIST"] BFL SC Pre-Order Information (Monarch orders too!) - page 27. (Read 136393 times)
October 09, 2012, 02:53:05 AM
October 09, 2012, 02:46:16 AM
Is the only way to get a Little BFL through the upgrade process or can they be ordered individually?
October 08, 2012, 10:29:34 AM
You can add me to the list:
06/28/2012,2469,N,4,0,0,-,-,ragnard
Changed the 4 jalepenos to 1 little single:06/28/2012,2469,N,4,0,0,-,-,ragnard
06/28/2012,2469,N,Little Single,0,0,-,-,ragnard
October 07, 2012, 05:16:27 PM
10/7/2012 10462 N 0 1 0 - - fcx35x10
October 06, 2012, 08:57:54 PM
1017? 10/4/2012 N 1 0 0
October 05, 2012, 04:08:23 PM
My order:
| Date Paid | Order Number
October 05, 2012, 03:47:17 PM
08/05/2012 4565 N 1 Little Single - - nomorecoin All Jally's upgraded to 1 SC Little Single Haven't updated for Little singles yet, On its way. 07/19/2012 3550 N 3 0 0 - - Yogafan BTW, I noticed the order numbers near mine are out of order in your list. You have avidreader's order number 3540, marked down as order paid on 7/17/2012. The order date in his post is 7/18/2012. (Sorry, that my OCD coming out) Unfortunately my script does this, Trying to iron this out. October 05, 2012, 08:16:31 AM
07/19/2012 3550 N 3 0 0 - - Yogafan
BTW, I noticed the order numbers near mine are out of order in your list. You have avidreader's order number 3540, marked down as order paid on 7/17/2012. The order date in his post is 7/18/2012. (Sorry, that my OCD coming out) October 05, 2012, 02:22:08 AM
order 43xx 4 jalap. and order 45xx 2 jalap. both 08-05 both cancelled, order no 43xx 08-05 updated to 1 Single SC 60Gh/s.
October 04, 2012, 08:17:07 PM
Check it out... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/asic-testing-some-interesting-activity-115515 EDIT: nvm  October 04, 2012, 04:54:42 PM
Just the difference Cool. Hope they get to me soon! October 04, 2012, 02:38:41 PM
You can add me to the list:
06/28/2012,2469,N,4,0,0,-,-,ragnard October 04, 2012, 02:32:13 PM
08/05/2012 4565 N 1 0 0 - - nomorecoin 08/14/2012 5319 N 1 0 0 - - nomorecoin 08/24/2012 6186 N 1 0 0 - - nomorecoin Updated: 08/05/2012 4565 N 1 Little Single - - nomorecoin 08/14/2012 5319 N 0 0 0 - - nomorecoin 08/24/2012 6186 N 0 0 0 - - nomorecoin 08/24/2012 6189 N 0 0 0 - - nomorecoin All Jally's upgraded to 1 SC Little Single How much did it cost for the upgrade? October 04, 2012, 12:01:47 PM
08/16/2012 - N 0 1 0 - - tbcoin
10/01/2012 - N 0 0 1 - - tbcoin October 04, 2012, 11:27:04 AM
Trade In: No
Order No: 6997 1 Jalepeno Date Paid: 2012 September 1st October 04, 2012, 11:22:44 AM
Add me to your list, please.
10/04/2012 10127 Y 0 1 0 - - Jorgen October 04, 2012, 09:03:09 AM
Those that adopt ASIC sooner, at a higher price point, may be left with longer ROI periods than those that wait to purchase. That's what I've been thinking for a while. When BFL first announced preorders, the price per BTC was half what it was today. This means you can buy an ASIC for half what it cost you 3 months ago. that's why I paid in fiat. This logic of yours... If you bought BTC for the same money and sold it today you'd have had enough money for twice your order all the while carrying the same risks as you in fact carried. You still made a loss. October 04, 2012, 02:30:33 AM
8/17/2012 5617 Y,0,1,0,?,?
October 03, 2012, 12:32:36 AM
eh, might as well as add mine.
2593 jally 7/1 October 01, 2012, 10:16:06 AM
How can they use firmware to increase speed? Wouldn't this mean that they are simply overclocking it in order to increase the cycles/sec? In order to do that it would require more power.. so then how can say in range of their supposed power specs? I'd love to see a working prototype =/ Picture it this way: They were underclocked before.Or, to be more accurate, they were originally designed with the newly-release specs in mind, but BFL underestimated them in order to be certain to overdeliver instead of underdeliver. Has BFL gone on record that this data is from prototypes or is this all theoretical? I haven't seen a single quote by a BFL that this is actual hardware data and not estimation. Even their original message they were very careful to say something along the lines of "the original intent all along was to increase the rate with firmware should a price war occur". Never did they say that this increase was due to optimization after testing physical hardware. 1) BFL released specs below what they thought they would be able to achieve, to "be on the safe side". 2) A competitor released specs exceeding BFL's safe-side specs. 3) BFL didn't want to lose the lead of GHash/$$$, so they have now released their full estimated specs. Jump to:
|
