I can't agree enough. What kind of sickness is it for people like roach, stolfi, jbreher, etc to come here and spout their non-stop garbage
I wouldn't bundle jbreher with stolfi. And The Roach is just on another plane of existence.
I'm not saying they are the same. What I mean is the constant posting about the same topic over and over again that has already been answered by everyone here many times over. It seems like very obsessive behavior, especially since they know they can't convince anyone here of anything they say.
Well, I may not be the best arbiter of my own behavior. However, it seems to me that these argument-storms always start when someone takes one of my posts that has nothing to do with the topic, and feels compelled to reply with some nonsense that is clearly incorrect about the characteristics of either BCH or SV (or, as often, counterfactual nonsense about BTC itself). As if to publicly shame me for some aspect of 'The Other Bitcoins'. If you have not yet learned, I am not going to allow such bullshit to be the unchallenged record.
The obvious solution is obvious: don't spout lies that might require me to correct.
jbreher in particular is bad with this. Why does he keep posting his so called technical comments here, when he could be posting them in the development area of the forum or github. Perhaps because he is full of shit and knows it.
Quite the contrary. The technical issues are trivial and fully understood by the technocrats. It is the economic assumptions and game theory assumptions that are completely flawed. The technical sub-forum is dedicated to SW implementation, and occasionally to protocol implementation to hew to economic decisions that are outside the scope of that sub-forum. Accordingly, my comments are fully out of scope for the technical sub-forum.
I have always stated freely that I find the devs pretty much capable within their technical areas. But a bulletproof and faithful SW implementation of an inherently flawed design is still inherently flawed.
Really difficult to believe you, jbreher.
On an ongoing basis you are bringing technical arguments into this thread, and trying to get people to argue with you on your grounds which are at minimum feigned technical with your claims about the various ways that bitcoin is deficient in terms of segregated witness or layer 2 solutions.
Furthermore, now you are acting like there is no other place for you to make your various technical claims. Seems like a lot of nonsense.
To me, it seem that you are trying to lord over your technical mumbo jumbo to trick people into agreeing with you based on assumptions that you sufficiently know technicals so you are playing those technical authority cards in this thread on an ongoing basis, but your punchline is really not technical at all... it is pure politics and wanting to disrupt and to weaken bitcoin's governance.. perhaps under a belief that bitcoin would be btter off if it were able to adapt more easily.. and that is a bullshit argument as well, when push comes to shove.
So the fact that you are putting out various bullshit arguments about bitcoin being broken or that its governance needs to change, much of the time, you are framing those argument in technical mumbo jumbo and acting like you have the technical answers while trying to burden others to argue in that framework here in this thread.... NO wonder people frequently proclaim that you should be taking your arguments to other technical threads.
