Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol
Most other people on my ignore list fade away. It's hard to believe he's still here.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11847. (Read 26576751 times)
January 09, 2019, 06:37:37 PM
Most other people on my ignore list fade away. It's hard to believe he's still here.
January 09, 2019, 06:23:12 PM
[edited out]
......I have repeatedly indicated that the chance seems unlikely, but there is no proof per se that CSW is not satoshi. Given the evidence we have at this time, that would be tantamount to disproving a negative. That ain't how logic works.Your statement here, jbreher, borders on crazytalk.
There is absolutely no burden for anyone to prove that CSW is NOT Satoshi.
The burden is 100% (or at least fucking close to 100%) upon CSW to prove that he is satoshi, if that is what he intends to claim (or continue to claim).
Furthermore, decent and reasonable means of attempting proof through signing of a known satoshi block have been outlined many times, and CSW fails and/or refuses to even attempt the most reasonable acceptable means to accomplish such identification verification.
January 09, 2019, 06:20:10 PM
It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not. That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.
Glad to see you back JJG.
I will solve this right now: Mic, JJG has a point here, you should *always* post a link to the source of your memes/twitter quotes.
Happy now?
P.S.: I needed almost a couple of minutes to make sense of your post. Please consider there are some non-english speakers here. Mic isn't. Neither me.
January 09, 2019, 06:13:33 PM
I miss JJGs voluminous posts. 
I be like this:
JJGs shortest post ever, and an answer that made me laugh.
I do so prefer his new short style.
If I am trying to catch up, then there be no time for elaborationings.
Must be a New Years resolution, or the AI program is completed now. 
Now, I be like this:
January 09, 2019, 06:10:23 PM
It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not. That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.
Welcome back JJG. Good to see you are rested and ready for action.
January 09, 2019, 06:06:55 PM
You all are really a bit obsessed with your roach toyboy, aren't you?
No. Actually most of us (try to!) ignore him. For us this thread is only 47 pages long too.
Mmm so you have on ignore to ?
Everybody does.
Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol
January 09, 2019, 06:06:35 PM
It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not. That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.
Edited to add my response to the following post.
Does it matter who said it initially? He posted it as a screenshot so it's clear he's not claiming it is his and it's not news or information that needs sourcing as it's self-contained and therefore interpretable without context.
Who cares who said it. I mean if a random hobo in the street said it would that change how you interpret the statement? You either agree or disagree. You are either receptive to the argument (insofar as present) or not.
Who cares who said it. I mean if a random hobo in the street said it would that change how you interpret the statement? You either agree or disagree. You are either receptive to the argument (insofar as present) or not.
Yes, it does matter, in part, for the reasons that I stated above.
January 09, 2019, 05:58:37 PM
1000 BTC sell wall on Finex at 4079.. was being eaten so it was pulled. Hmmm, may be going up. Someone really wants the price lower. Hopefully all the weak people already dumped in the low 3k's.
January 09, 2019, 05:51:01 PM
----------
The flip-flop report
Some observer effects have been noted and I am now concerned that this "consolidation" period could turn into a correction downwards.
D
https://i.imgur.com/J1NYVbx.jpg
#dyor
I still want to see that attempt towards $4,300 but agree that the technical picture is deteriorating now towards a correction.
Arbitrary lines but this is what I am looking at:
January 09, 2019, 05:49:01 PM
There is also the edge to edge effect where once price enters the cloud it can be drawn to the opposite edge.
This is true. We have already passed thru the majority of resistance and into the cloud structure. What we are going to encounter this next trading session is the lagging span running into the conversion line. If that is breached and the price remains near these levels it would be pretty bullish imho. If not, yah..expect a retraction.
Important question about the ichimoku cloud. If we pass through it, will the white buffalo be waiting to greet us on the other side?
Shiroi suigyu wa anata desu.
+1 WOsMerit
Hai, watashi no yūjin, kita no osuushi wa watashitachi o sukuu tame ni kite imasu.
January 09, 2019, 05:43:56 PM
You all are really a bit obsessed with your roach toyboy, aren't you?
No. Actually most of us (try to!) ignore him. For us this thread is only 47 pages long too.
Mmm so you have on ignore to ?
Everybody does.
January 09, 2019, 05:42:36 PM
Important question about the ichimoku cloud. If we pass through it, will the white buffalo be waiting to greet us on the other side?
Shiroi suigyu wa anata desu.
January 09, 2019, 05:39:12 PM
Important question about the ichimoku cloud. If we pass through it, will the white buffalo be waiting to greet us on the other side?
January 09, 2019, 05:27:55 PM
There is also the edge to edge effect where once price enters the cloud it can be drawn to the opposite edge.
January 09, 2019, 05:13:36 PM
I have spent many months nude in the wilderness cawing at eagles and communing with ancient sages in hilltop monasteries in an attempt to understand the default trust system.
I still do not. And care even less.
I still do not. And care even less.
+1 WOsMerit
I care as much about that trust thing as I do about the merit system. Which I use sorta like a "like" buttom and it made me hero and stuff, but other than that is just a feature of the forum which is even more meaningless to me than a %1 volatility of Bitcoin which is what I really care about.
+1 WOsMerit
Welp those are the changes to how ratings are ascertained.
But I have never learnt what the Default Trust system is supposed to rate. Anyone care to ELI5? Is this for OTC trading?
But I have never learnt what the Default Trust system is supposed to rate. Anyone care to ELI5? Is this for OTC trading?
Back in the day when escrow was king...a trust system was sort of handy to have. Today these OTC channels are quite strongly developed imo. Suppose it might be useful for some.
----------
The flip-flop report
Some observer effects have been noted and I am now concerned that this "consolidation" period could turn into a correction downwards.
D
#dyor
January 09, 2019, 05:04:20 PM
But I have never learnt what the Default Trust system is supposed to rate. Anyone care to ELI5? Is this for OTC trading?
It seems to largely be for cultivating grudges and oneupmanship.
January 09, 2019, 05:02:46 PM
Quote
Post new feedback | Trust settings
Risked BTC amount is money that the person could have stolen or did steal. For example, if you do a currency trade where the other person sends first, your feedback for them would have 0 risked BTC and their feedback for you would have risked BTC equal to the BTC value of the trade.
Yup in theory for feedback in trading: currencies;hardware;collectibles etcRisked BTC amount is money that the person could have stolen or did steal. For example, if you do a currency trade where the other person sends first, your feedback for them would have 0 risked BTC and their feedback for you would have risked BTC equal to the BTC value of the trade.
people who renege on eg auction promises, or who build scamcoins eg ethereum, or who post phishing links
nowadays it's just as often a dick-measuring contest
the default part was for newbies who couldn't know who to trust; they could rely on say some big well-known guy like philipma1957's opinion that suchandsuch mining supplier wouldn't rip them off
January 09, 2019, 04:56:52 PM
?
DT= deep throat, drunk tank, don’t trip,double team, dream theater, don’t TROLL.... ??
DT= deep throat, drunk tank, don’t trip,double team, dream theater, don’t TROLL.... ??
The forum - Default Trust system
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/defaulttrust-changes-5095156
Welp those are the changes to how ratings are ascertained.
But I have never learnt what the Default Trust system is supposed to rate. Anyone care to ELI5? Is this for OTC trading?
January 09, 2019, 04:48:14 PM
I care as much about that trust thing as I do about the merit system. Which I use sorta like a "like" buttom and it made me hero and stuff, but other than that is just a feature of the forum which is even more meaningless to me than a %1 volatility of Bitcoin which is what I really care about.
January 09, 2019, 04:41:54 PM
I have spent many months nude in the wilderness cawing at eagles and communing with ancient sages in hilltop monasteries in an attempt to understand the default trust system.
I still do not. And care even less.
I still do not. And care even less.
Jump to: