so r0ach, fair question, are you that big of a winner in life?
Are you not intelligent enough to figure out it's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency at all? That transaction validators are always designed to centralize in every single one, and the only possible endgame of a digital currency will be an enslavement tool controlled by the govt resembling the Chinese social credit score system?
Even if transaction validators weren't designed to centralize (an impossible hurdle to fix), the simple act of tokens being non-fungible would still give you that result. You need to be a flat out drooling idiot to shill for imaginary, valueless, digital tracking tokens over physical metals. Why do you think people like Ben Bernanke and Larry Summers promote them? This thread and the entire cryptocurrency industry is composed of 1/2 dumbasses and 1/2 people who would sell their soul to the devil for a nickel.
Soooooo, your the only smart guy in a whole thread with i don't know how many members??
Most humans are compartmentalized, retard savants only good at doing a small subset of tasks due to human specialization of labor. Yea, there are some 'well-trained' retard savants on the forum who are good at some random thing like assembly, but being good at assembly doesn't convey universal knowledge about everything.
Probably the main reason these people you make believe are smart get this subject so wrong is due to the god complex most programmers have. They make believe any problem can just be coded around and that there's no such thing as an unsolvable problem. I used to believe the same thing about bitcoin, as well as people like Anonymint. Then I started noticing things like it doesn't even solve the Byzantine generals problem; they attempted to change the syntax to "bitcoin solves a form of the Byzantine generals problem" to try and somewhat cover up this inconvenient truth.
Then from there I said it's really not possible to create a decentralized digital currency and attempting to hard code a fixed number of transaction validators (the crap Dan Larimer does) would probably be the only half ass thing that can come from any of this, but none of it is actually decentralized and has no purpose over metals. Anonymint then started also posting it's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency, and even one of the founders of Zerohedge posted on here saying the only reason he reads the forum is to read posts from me + Anonymint.
We have discussed these topics for years, and the only real argument left is that Anonymint claims he has some secret way to make a decentralized digital currency, but he really doesn't. It's 100% impossible to make one.
Lol, the intellectual fails in this post are just sad. Bringing up a random, irrelevant skill like assembly, how old must you be man? No wonder you are so detached from the world and its future.
Your idea that programmers think everything is solvable is also ludicrous. There are tons of intractable problems in computer science.
Your dismissal of Bitcoin and the movement it started also completely misses the point. Even if its not perfect, its an improvement for sure and will create the path towards a more egalitarian currency, either soon or in the future. But the first building blocks were set here in this decade. Your failure to contribute something to this effort while wasting time arguing false truths.. Its just sad at this point.
Ive read your exchanges with Anonymint/iamnotback over the years and you claiming victory here is just another example of your pathethic ego. At no point did you ever produce a coherent and effective argument, always caught up in your own bubble of ignorance.
You have set a great example on how not to be. Actually a wake up call for some people, like seeing a heroine-addicted bum, a warning for what happens if you fuck up in life.
You're a true loser, Roach, after years of lurking I can finally communicate that message through my good friend here.