ffs, is there some kind of rule 34 about conspiracy theories?
There should be, like: everything has a 'conspiracy (theory) of it'.
Make it rule 36?
It cannot be rule 35 - as that is already in use as the update to rule 34, which is that 'if there isn't yet, there will be'.
So, of course you'd need a rule 37 (see rule 35).
I never delved around the dark nutcase (or more enlightened?) fringe recesses of the web enough, life is too short. However, after a few years on here, I have come to realise it's pretty pointless to assume
anything will be universally accepted as a fact. And often the rebuttal involves a conspiracy theory to prove it.
Challenger is a new one for me, but I am not surprised to see it exists.