Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13672. (Read 26714892 times)

If anything you deserve to be burned at the stake with him, if that were the case, because you both were BIG blocker nutjobs, but for some reason you thought that you could continue to serve your evil doer masters (Roger, Jihan and Craig) by continuing to participate in this thread with your BIGblocker nutjob conspiracy theories which transform out of convenience into Bcash pumping and other denigrations of bitcoin. 

Sure it is possible that you have actually employed a more diverse investment strategy that allows you to sometimes confine yourself to the more central topics of this bitcoin thread......

Also, Richie_T whine quitted, and surely he could come back here and be welcomed back, but for some reason he has too much emotion and/or pride and perhaps strives to receives some kind of princesa treatment, which none of us are entitled to that kind of princesa treatment (even though also Richie_T was very well respected for his bot contributions.. but chose to use the removal of such chartbuddy bot as a dramatic exit (mike hearn style or some other prima donna snowflake visions of self).. 

Let's say he comes back, and he would likely get razzed and harassed for a bit of time by some of us, but in the end, there is nothing stopping him from coming back.... except his own pride.

Same with you jbreher.. with some of your nonsense supporting of bcash, and BIG blocks and seemingly hostile positions against bitcoin (while trying to act like it is merely "free market.. blah blah blah), if you don't show too much of your nonsensical pumping of shit, spreading misleading ideas and attacks on bitcoin, then after a while people in this forum will credit you for your contribution and ideas.. but part of the problem for you is that you cannot help yourself to devolve back into nonsense politics that get rejected over and over in this forum by members, and that includes your inability to refrain by an historical reformulation that Richie_T  did not voluntarily remove himself based on his own crybaby taking of his marbles from the playground but instead implying that he was "forced" out... what bullshit..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAJLJRRJY3E

420

 


PS: Dennis Rodman for 2020

The roach ain't gonna answer any of your questions with anything close to "real information" because answering those kinds of questions is not in his/her/its program... S/he/it participates in this WO thread merely to distract us from talking about bitcoin, and spreading various kinds of incitefull nonsense.

In the initial January 24 merit distribution, theymos gave 500 merits to all hero members; however, about two weeks later, he rethought his initial distribution decision, and he decided to give an additional 500 merit (initial distribution) to all hero members who had at least 778 activity points at the time of the 1/24 initial distribution. 

Theymos concluded that the additional 500 initial distribution merits would be more fair concerning those higher activity level hero members, perhaps partly based on the quirky and quasi-random way that the forum's algorithm ranks up from hero to legendary, which can take place anywhere between 778 and 1100 activity points (something like that).

I always calculate my profit in bitcoins. I feel ok if today I have more bitcoins than I had yesterday. The habitual taking of profit in bitcoins gives me the ability to stay calm.

Chartbuddy's creator was burned at the stake, accused of heresy. Though he escaped with his life, and continues tracking the markets for all to see in a more hospitable environment.

You are reading your contribution(s) too modestly... .. 


I have another hobby besides bitcoin that requires a certain amount of practice and improvement that comes with experience. 

A common used expression in that hobby is "fake it until you make it,"  which I have found works for a lot of hobbies.

Bearish? I'm being typecast!

From your previous description of the way that you were attempting to employ margin (really shorting), seemed to be a more reasonable and measured way than most of the seemingly all or nothing descriptions that I hear about.



It seems that you had employed a strategy that was to consider the ramifications of either price direction, and of course when any of us hedge our bets, we are not going to win as much as if we were playing an all or nothing strategy - even while we are creating insurance, too, yet on the other hand, I, personally, believe that hedging is a much more solid long term play - both psychologically and financially, because if you add up the wins and losses (if you are being honest with yourself), you are much more likely to come out ahead and even willing to invest more if you are playing with strategies that both account for either price direction and don't play balls to the walls.



Well, yes.  One of the recognizable problems is that whales will sometimes push the price in the opposite direction of your margin bets, which cause your stops to get played and then the market quickly reverses.  Even though you did not have that issue in recent times, the practice of forcing stop losses needs to be appreciated as an ongoing possibility that could cause you to buy or sell at a time that has been manipulated and it certainly not of your chosing.



Sometimes you can vastly increase your "play money" while also skimming a little bit off the top to put into reserves.  Of course, how you play your money remains discretionary, and if you develop good safeguarding practices, it is not too likely that all of a sudden you are going to revert to reckless gambling practices... and as we know there is another saying, which is "the rich become richer".. or put another way "you gotta to have money to make money".. there is some truth to those idioms..


Actually, don't get my prudish talk wrong because I am not opposed to gambling with some of the winnings and especially if you have already taken several safeguards to ensure that your bills are going to be paid for several months in advance and you are not dipping into "emergency money."   Frequently, we hear about folks who "had to" sell at the bottom because of an "unexpected emergency."  We are frequently going to have "emergencies" and they should be factored into any plan because failing to plan only causes an excuse about an "emergency" that could have and should have been anticipated to be within the realm of possibilities... so yeah, in short, I believe that there are prudent ways that you can set up your bets and to play possibilities that would likely pay off better in one direction rather than the other direction... but you are really not going to be devastated if the market goes against you.. which in the end adds up to a kind of "sensible" bet.

2 a 3 bullruns before hitting $100k.

sorry, I was responding to Anon's question about "cracking", selling in dispair

What "it" are you referring to?

It's just too hard to crack, climbing the volcano, diving the marianas trench, calibrating the electron microscope...just too difficult to embark on on a whim

What country do you live in? Also what is your ethnicity and age?

In a r0ach nest?

Roach, where do you live?

I'd say it would probably be a lot worse going from $100k to $10k.  Also, a lot of people on this forum don't seem to understand bitcoin might still be in the $200-$1000 range without the enormous amount of Bitfinex and Chinese exchange fraud.  I mean, it's 100% fact that the entire market has been controlled by a single entity operating on Bitfinex since the price was $200.  This entity is either the exchange owners themselves or the Chinese mining cartel who operates in league with the exchange owners while getting kickbacks, or some giant whale like the ESF/Goldman Sachs rigging the market while issuing gag orders.

If this manipulation is removed or implodes, people calling for $3k bottom might be high balling it by a lot and the thing could crater down into the hundreds of dollars again.  It feels like to me though that the shitcoin market is being artificially propped up to try and distract people from gold and silver on purpose.  The next bull run on metals will probably break the bank so to speak from failure to deliver in LBMA/Comex/etc.

My nine figures went to eight figures. I feel fine. I see your point, but one could just as easily argue that holders are playing with even more house money.

Game over for any type of ATH between now and halving.

Do not mind the capitulation talk...showing the blood on the streets is a good thing.