Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking &amp; discussion - page 13849. (Read 26720873 times)

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 20, 2018, 11:07:57 AM

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

A million dollars isn’t that much in the scheme of things. That’s half a house in Vancouver, Canada. Probably a third of a house in Silicon Valley. It’s not even a downpayment in London unless you are an hour from the City.

It's not that much if you need to be in one of those places you listed. Where, if you are, you will be paid well enough to be able to afford it (out of necessity) but will still only have a lifestyle on par with someone making 1/5th of your salary elsewhere. A really comfortable retirement starting at age 30 only requires about 2 million though. So it's not that a million is a small amount of money so much as it's that the particular examples you gave are WAY overpriced. For reference you need about 7 million dollars in assets to be in the american 1% and about 3 million to be in the global 1% (those figures assume that you have only assets and no income).

But yea there is a sense in which you are absolutely right. A lot of very financially illiterate people have very bad misconceptions about what a million dollars means. They will play a lottery that promises to pay out a million dollars and think if they could just win than they could live like an elite and never have to work again, which of course is not even close to accurate. It's also why everyone who wins the lottery blows through it all in a couple years, they think they won WAY more than they actually did.

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 13660

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on May 20, 2018, 11:07:57 AM

(big green dildo candle)

bob thanx you for that

Harlot

hero member

Activity: 1806

Merit: 672

It looks like we are having a breakout from the descending broadening wedge due to the formation of a inverse head and shoulder in its 4 hour chart which I have not saw earlier. Target 1 would be 8,600-8,800$ if BTC breaks that we are off to the 9,000$ level again. Remember that this breakout happened in its 4 hour chart which means it might take long for BTC to go back up that level. There is still a possibility that this bis a bull trap so BTC needs to stay above 8,350$ for a while in order to stabilize a support.

Robin,Hood

member

Activity: 462

Merit: 62

Quote from: bones261 on May 20, 2018, 10:03:11 AM

Quote from: Ibian on May 20, 2018, 10:47:15 AM

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

If you read that twitter stream, to this day Charlie doesn't consider Litecoin a scam.

But often we need to reconsider what the definition of a scam truly is.

I mean, to make Litecoin he literally took a snapshot of the Bitcoin source code, changed like 2 easily-found config parameters, and launched it. And he admitted that it took him all of like a long Saturday to change and test it. He put almost zero effort into creating Litecoin. He created an altcoin of Bitcoin with a few clicks of a mouse. What he did, anyone could literally do with enough knowledge of the code.

So what part about that process and goal isn't scammy? Today when people do that with the Bitcoin source, we say that they're doing it for scammy or selfish purposes. But for some reason we give Charlie a pass because he's a nice guy, Bitcoin proponent, and no longer holds any LTC. (Little known fact: he once DID hold a metric shitload of LTC and probably made a million dollars selling some before LTC even hit $0.20c)

Changing the algorithm from SHA256d to SCRYPT was a little more involved than changing a couple of parameters. But yes, something like this could definitely be done in 24 hours.

The creation of Litecoin stems from the emerging of more and more scamcoins like GeistGeld, ixcoin, Tenebix, Solidcoin....
To counteract Tenebixes 7.7 million premine Faircoin was launched. Basically a 100% copy minus the premine, done in an instand. It was a rushed job just to deal with it. From then with a proper announcement and a little bit more work and thought Litecoin emerged. The prelaunch thread had 5000 views and a vote for best launch time (4 options).

Quote

Quote from: molecular on August 17, 2011, 06:55:42 AM
The Egg of Columbus comes to mind. That's why nobody else did it and people that saw it early had all kinds of objections... "An egg of Columbus or Columbus's egg refers to a brilliant idea or discovery that seems simple or easy after the fact." A million bitcoins is the least he deserves. His "invention" is worth more than that if in the end, we have free money.

+1

I totally agree. I hope he becomes the richest man on earth. What Satoshi was able to come up with on his own was truly remarkable.

Quote

I actually believe what Satoshi came up with IS brilliant. And that's why I think he may not be one person. It takes someone who is great at math, economics, and computer science to come up with this. And his solution is also very thorough. I'm really surprised to see such a complete solution in a version 1 product. Know what I mean? When someone comes up with something this novel, normally, the first attempt will crash and burn. So I give Satoshi a lot of credit. He deserves every single bitcoin he owns.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Torque

legendary

Activity: 3794

Merit: 5474

He didn't pretend it was the new bitcoin.

No. But he did spend literally years opining that "Litecoin is silver to Bitcoin's gold." Which we all know is complete and utter bullshit since the two have zero correlation.

Torque

legendary

Activity: 3794

Merit: 5474

Quote from: jbreher on May 20, 2018, 10:44:34 AM

Methinks you need to ponder upon the definitions of 'open source' and 'permissionless'.

Methinks you need to ponder the upon the definitions of 'scam', 'troll', and 'shill'. You seem to gravitate towards those things.

Ibian

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1278

Quote from: itod on May 20, 2018, 06:50:41 AM

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

If you read that twitter stream, to this day Charlie doesn't consider Litecoin a scam.

But often we need to reconsider what the definition of a scam truly is.

I mean, to make Litecoin he literally took a snapshot of the Bitcoin source code, changed like 2 easily-found config parameters, and launched it. And he admitted that it took him all of like a long Saturday to change and test it. He put almost zero effort into creating Litecoin. He created an altcoin of Bitcoin with a few clicks of a mouse. What he did, anyone could literally do with enough knowledge of the code.

So what part about that process and goal isn't scammy? Today when people do that with the Bitcoin source, we say that they're doing it for scammy or selfish purposes. But for some reason we give Charlie a pass because he's a nice guy, Bitcoin proponent, and no longer holds any LTC. (Little known fact: he once DID hold a metric shitload of LTC and probably made a million dollars selling some before LTC even hit $0.20c)

He didn't pretend it was the new bitcoin.

Ibian

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1278

Quote from: Ibian on May 20, 2018, 06:15:30 AM

Quote from: buyandhold on May 20, 2018, 05:01:26 AM

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/05/19/0413238/google-removes-dont-be-evil-clause-from-its-code-of-conduct

I'd take the old guy with the killbot over the useful idiots any day.

If you would have any idea how hard is to get into that group that works for "Google Ideas" you would never say that. Each and every one in that group on the right has intellectual capacity you can only dream of. Jealousy is dangerous thing, when you want to be like someone but you don't have the necessary capabilities easiest thing to say is to bring them down, which only shows the kind of person you are.

Intelligence is not even close to the same thing as wisdom.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1688

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

If you read that twitter stream, to this day Charlie doesn't consider Litecoin a scam.

But often we need to reconsider what the definition of a scam truly is.

I mean, to make Litecoin he literally took a snapshot of the Bitcoin source code, changed like 2 easily-found config parameters, and launched it. And he admitted that it took him all of like a long Saturday to change and test it. He put almost zero effort into creating Litecoin. He created an altcoin of Bitcoin with a few clicks of a mouse. What he did, anyone could literally do with enough knowledge of the code.

So what part about that process and goal isn't scammy?

Methinks you need to ponder upon the definitions of 'open source' and 'permissionless'.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

If you read that twitter stream, to this day Charlie doesn't consider Litecoin a scam.

But often we need to reconsider what the definition of a scam truly is.

I mean, to make Litecoin he literally took a snapshot of the Bitcoin source code, changed like 2 easily-found config parameters, and launched it. And he admitted that it took him all of like a long Saturday to change and test it. He put almost zero effort into creating Litecoin. He created an altcoin of Bitcoin with a few clicks of a mouse. What he did, anyone could literally do with enough knowledge of the code.

So what part about that process and goal isn't scammy? Today when people do that with the Bitcoin source, we say that they're doing it for scammy or selfish purposes. But for some reason we give Charlie a pass because he's a nice guy, Bitcoin proponent, and no longer holds any LTC. (Little known fact: he once DID hold a metric shitload of LTC and probably made a million dollars selling some before LTC even hit $0.20c)

Changing the algorithm from SHA256d to SCRYPT was a little more involved than changing a couple of parameters. But yes, something like this could definitely be done in 24 hours.

Torque

legendary

Activity: 3794

Merit: 5474

Quote from: bitcoinPsycho on May 19, 2018, 07:08:14 AM

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

If you read that twitter stream, to this day Charlie doesn't consider Litecoin a scam.

But often we need to reconsider what the definition of a scam truly is.

I mean, to make Litecoin he literally took a snapshot of the Bitcoin source code, changed like 2 easily-found config parameters, and launched it. And he admitted that it took him all of like a long Saturday to change and test it. He put almost zero effort into creating Litecoin. He created an altcoin of Bitcoin with a few clicks of a mouse. What he did, anyone could literally do with enough knowledge of the code.

So what part about that process and goal isn't scammy? Today when people do that with the Bitcoin source, we say that they're doing it for scammy or selfish purposes. But for some reason we give Charlie a pass because he's a nice guy, Bitcoin proponent, and no longer holds any LTC. (Little known fact: he once DID hold a metric shitload of LTC and probably made a million dollars selling some before LTC even hit $0.20c)

Agapios

member

Activity: 136

Merit: 17

$9000 in 24 hours confirmed

24 hours passed, it did not happen.

Just to tell you in case you did not notice you were WRONG.

vapourminer

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 3614

what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?

Quote from: RoomBot on May 19, 2018, 06:07:17 PM

Quote from: vapourminer on May 18, 2018, 06:55:55 PM

ugliest watch ever.

i did look through the richardmille watch site, the one with dragon figures seemed okish

but $800k+ for a watch. lulz. no matter how rich i became, i would never pay that for a watch.

now, i could see myself with one of those olde skool red LED watches from the 70's.. press the button to light up the time. THOSE were cool.

The SWATCH? LOL

No, wait, that was the 80's, but I liked the interchangeable plastic wrist bands.

nah, ones like this reproduction (i would want originals of course). press the button to see the time.

itod

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1077

Honey badger just does not care

Quote from: Ibian on May 20, 2018, 06:15:30 AM

Quote from: buyandhold on May 20, 2018, 05:01:26 AM

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/05/19/0413238/google-removes-dont-be-evil-clause-from-its-code-of-conduct

I'd take the old guy with the killbot over the useful idiots any day.

If you would have any idea how hard is to get into that group that works for "Google Ideas" you would never say that. Each and every one in that group on the right has intellectual capacity you can only dream of. Jealousy is dangerous thing, when you want to be like someone but you don't have the necessary capabilities easiest thing to say is to bring them down, which only shows the kind of person you are.

Ibian

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1278

Quote from: buyandhold on May 20, 2018, 05:01:26 AM

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/05/19/0413238/google-removes-dont-be-evil-clause-from-its-code-of-conduct

I'd take the old guy with the killbot over the useful idiots any day.

buyandhold

member

Activity: 231

Merit: 43

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/05/19/0413238/google-removes-dont-be-evil-clause-from-its-code-of-conduct

HairyMaclairy

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 2282

Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist

This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I think he worked at google right?

That would make for it yeah. Also probably he is older than he looks like (in fact in recent pictures he does).

A million dollars isn’t that much in the scheme of things. That’s half a house in Vancouver, Canada. Probably a third of a house in Silicon Valley. It’s not even a downpayment in London unless you are an hour from the City.

Robin,Hood

member

Activity: 462

Merit: 62