Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13864. (Read 26723446 times)

sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
Lying dirtbags like this guy make me sick who just make up complete bullshit on the fly in order to try and shill for worthless craptocurrency to enrich themselves:



No, there is not only "one form of money".  What a joke.  The only real form of trade or non-violent transaction between humans is barter - saying I'll give you some random shit for some of your random shit.  The further you abstract away from barter, the bigger a scam it is.  It just so happens due to specialization of labor, humans decided to attempt to do that.  You can abstract away from barter in more ways than you can count; some work better than others. There is definitely not only one way to do so.

This douchebag seems to imply anyone who doesn't agree to join in on bitcoin's horrifically bad pyramid scheme distribution that would benefit him personally is somehow a bad person.  HAHA.  Fucking laughable.  If someone doesn't like that distribution and believes it's already been cornered by hedge funds or Goldman Sachs or whoever - which makes you a slave by agreeing to participate in it - they're perfectly within their rights to look elsewhere if it benefits them instead of obeying this idiot's commands to use only bitcoin.

Bitcoin has the most faggiest, lying, dishonest, piece of shit shills I've EVER seen in any type of asset.

His post makes zero sense from any perspective.  The fact he claims there can only be one form of money when shitcoins came oh, 13 billion or so years after silver and gold was another dumbfuck to the extreme blunder.  Let's also completely overlook the fact that silver and gold are real commodities, hence closely related to barter, while bitcoin is a fake commodity, so much further abstracted away from barter and inherently much greater of a scam.

legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474


All the people at the peak of Mt. Stupid on that chart were all the big blockers and BCash shills.

SW and LN has since destroyed their ignorance and delusion.

Now can we get on with doing the same for all the mETH heads and all the ICO shitcoin lovers?

full member
Activity: 770
Merit: 146
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
This asshole (ess?) author tells how they feel about Bitcoin in the very first sentence:

https://theoutline.com/post/4561/bitcoin-is-consuming-as-much-energy-as-the-country-of-ireland?zd=1&zi=xq6inacu

Quote

"In addition to being insufferable, Bitcoin is also absolutely terrible for the environment."


Fuck off, Paris.  Mmmkay? Angry
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2868
Shitcoin Minimalist
The gox trustee isn't allowed to dump any more coins unless the court orders him to. The last dump was because the court decided he needed more money to pay interest on all the fiat owed.

The trustee says he's almost sure civil rehabilitation will be approved, which means all those owed Bitcoins get paid back in Bitcoins. Although there might be another sale of a relatively small number of coins the vast majority are likely to get returned to gox's customers.

Yep, seems that way. If it goes to CR, we'll probably be looking at a year or more of lockup while all the claims are reassessed.

If we get CR, a lot of involuntary holders will likely dump at least a portion of their coins.

On the plus side, more of them will dump their btrash.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2868
Shitcoin Minimalist
This tweet from Charlie Lee has surprised me:

https://twitter.com/SatoshiLite/status/997978007875670016

He was millionaire before Bitcoin? Surprising. Anyone knows what he was doing before?

I don't know what he was doing before, but now he's getting rekt on Twitter, apparently:

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
The problem with lottery winners is that they are bad with money in general. That's why they play the fucking lottery in the first place.

We only hear about the ones that want publicity. I bet the winners who want their identities kept secret are better with money than those who want publicity.

Sure but that's not even the point. On average, you have to spend more money on lottery tickets than you win when you eventually do win, assuming a long enough timeline. Overall the money put into the system is more than the payout. It's a net tax on money-dumb people.

Most gambling is. Any casino or bookie almost always gets more money from a customer than the customer wins back. I agree a lottery gives some of the worst odds of getting anything back.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
Oh yea, and the Russians are right.  The US will break up into several different quadrants after the dollar goes.  The confederacy will use silver and gold as money along with Texas, probably the north east too, while what happens to places like Cuckafornia is anyone's guess.

full member
Activity: 242
Merit: 101
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
The problem with lottery winners is that they are bad with money in general. That's why they play the fucking lottery in the first place.

We only hear about the ones that want publicity. I bet the winners who want their identities kept secret are better with money than those who want publicity.

Sure but that's not even the point. On average, you have to spend more money on lottery tickets than you win when you eventually do win, assuming a long enough timeline. Overall the money put into the system is more than the payout. It's a net tax on money-dumb people.
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
That's preferable to the trustee dumping the entire gox stash.

Gox holders will probably on average dump 1/2 and let the rest ride.  Meaning some will dump all for a windfall and others hold all, and it will probably average out to something like 1/2 dumped.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
The gox trustee isn't allowed to dump any more coins unless the court orders him to. The last dump was because the court decided he needed more money to pay interest on all the fiat owed.

The trustee says he's almost sure civil rehabilitation will be approved, which means all those owed Bitcoins get paid back in Bitcoins. Although there might be another sale of a relatively small number of coins the vast majority are likely to get returned to gox's customers.

Yep, seems that way. If it goes to CR, we'll probably be looking at a year or more of lockup while all the claims are reassessed.

If we get CR, a lot of involuntary holders will likely dump at least a portion of their coins.

That's preferable to the trustee dumping the entire gox stash.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
The gox trustee isn't allowed to dump any more coins unless the court orders him to. The last dump was because the court decided he needed more money to pay interest on all the fiat owed.

The trustee says he's almost sure civil rehabilitation will be approved, which means all those owed Bitcoins get paid back in Bitcoins. Although there might be another sale of a relatively small number of coins the vast majority are likely to get returned to gox's customers.

Yep, seems that way. If it goes to CR, we'll probably be looking at a year or more of lockup while all the claims are reassessed.

If we get CR, a lot of involuntary holders will likely dump at least a portion of their coins.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Fox looks at moon


Hilarious....  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Your rage quit was barely even noticed, by me.

What were you gone for an additional 12 hours, beyond your normal sleeping time?

sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow

If you would have any idea how hard is to get into that group that works for "Google Ideas" you would never say that. Each and every one in that group on the right has intellectual capacity you can only dream of. Jealousy is dangerous thing, when you want to be like someone but you don't have the necessary capabilities easiest thing to say is to bring them down, which only shows the kind of person you are.

What a load of shit.  Even if one of these broads inherited suitable IQ, women do not have the right priorities to achieve greatness.  It would be like giving a toast making robot infinite powers of the mind when the only thing the robot wants to do and is capable of doing is making toast.  Women are missing all of the right priorities, sense of self-sacrifice, and risk taking behavior to achieve greatness, which is why you will never see something like a female George Washington, Robert E. Lee, or Adolph Hitler.  

Calling them mindless baby making machines is of course oversimplified, and just like you can teach a chimpanzee sign language, women can be taught other things, but their mindless baby making and child rearing instincts are going to infect anything they attempt to do like a virus and contaminate that process.  This is why women should never be allowed to vote.  One of their instincts is attempting to create as big of a social safety net for themselves and their offspring as possible, so you're 100% guaranteed to have communism every single time by allowing them to vote.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile

2. Who gives a XXXX

we use a thing called language here...it is for communicating

bye bye

Oh come on. That's a bit harsh. Take it easy.  Smiley
"crypto is electronic currency" and my personal welcome "Your welcome" already made my day.
Apparently the previous IQ discussion is still relevant. Legendary...

To be fair, menace has been teetering on the edge for a while.

It is pretty amazing how effectively some people are able to demonstrate the abrasive nature of their personality in a few lines of text.

Thanks for the heads up

did not realize it come across that way

time for a reality check, do not want to be abrasive


2. Instead of Who gives a XXXX, I Should of typed
who cares?

lol


I understand again apologies
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot

2. Who gives a fuck


we use a thing called language here...it is for communicating

bye bye

Oh come on. That's a bit harsh. Take it easy.  Smiley
"crypto is electronic currency" and my personal welcome "Your welcome" already made my day.
Apparently the previous IQ discussion is still relevant. Legendary...

To be fair, menace has been teetering on the edge for a while.

It is pretty amazing how effectively some people are able to demonstrate the abrasive nature of their personality in a few lines of text.
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
The gox trustee isn't allowed to dump any more coins unless the court orders him to. The last dump was because the court decided he needed more money to pay interest on all the fiat owed.

The trustee says he's almost sure civil rehabilitation will be approved, which means all those owed Bitcoins get paid back in Bitcoins. Although there might be another sale of a relatively small number of coins the vast majority are likely to get returned to gox's customers.

Yep, seems that way. If it goes to CR, we'll probably be looking at a year or more of lockup while all the claims are reassessed.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Thanks for providing some of your details.  I don't necessarily agree with your goals, but I would be concerned about some of your potential distractions with alt coins and that your perception that you have decent chances to use alt coins to accumulate more BTC than if you held BTC itself. 

I probably have disclosed numerous times in this thread that my alt coins tend to be less than 5% of my total holdings, and I think now is around 2%-ish.  I do understand that some members might have perceptions like yours that it is possibly useful to keep higher allocations in alts to accumulate BTC, and I tend to be o.k. if they were to take a 20% alt strategy, but not an 70% alt strategy as you seem to be currently... but maybe if you reversed your allocation to 70% BTC, you could still find a way to make it comfortable for you, especially if you have what seems to be a minimum 5 year investment and building of your portfolio plan.

Of course, in the end, you have to find your own level of comfort, but I tend towards lessening the gambling aspects which causes me to remain in the 90% plus arena for bitcoin, and I become less and less able to relate to those strategies the more that they allocate higher level to alts, even if they end up getting lucky by playing around with shit that can implode at any moment - which is not the same as the continuing strength of the fundamentals in bitcoin.


Well, I'm a believer in bitcoin, but can't say that I'm a maximalist as I'm not all-in with it. I see alts as an opportunity to get more bitcoin and so far my trades have been successful. I was almost 100% BTC about 2 months back when alts were bleeding and BTC somewhat held it's position, at least against the alts. Now there is more market movement in alts, so I have my main stash there. I'm a bit of a gambler myself aswell, maybe that's the reason I'm moving my stash around as much as I do.


When this thread was started, a bit more than 5 years ago, bitcoin was really the only game in town, and really it largely held such a central conscientiousness position for at least 4 of those recent 5 years.  Yeah there was the pumping of various alts in late 2013, too, but the various consciousness and seemingly distortion attacks on bitcoin began to gain steam in about late 2016 and early 2017, with the near flippening pumpening of the shitcoin that is also known as ethereum.

No way am I asserting that you would not be able to take risks and to make a shit ton loads of money that could possibly surpass your abilities to make money with a bitcoin centric approach... So accordingly, there are some costs and risks in moving your money around into these various projects, but sometimes the gains that you accomplish are going to be such that they outweigh either the moving around coins losses or the amount that you might have gained, just in bitcoin.  

Yes, such practice is a kind of gambling, and perhaps in recent times (or at least retrospectively) some bouncing around crypto folks have been able to measure some gambling odds that are decently well into their favor, which also would justify some of the gambling and to cause such gambling to seem more like strategic investment (which can be designed a bit differently from gambling by assessing some of the fundamentals or having some system that accounts for some decently assured fundamentals, such as considering whether the pumpers(backers) of the coin have decent systems in place that will allow you to get in and out of the coin during a price appreciation stage, before it cashes to some losing state.


But, like said, my main goal is to accumulate BTC. You got me worried a bit now, I think I'll transfer 30% of the wallet worth in BTC to a cold storage now and hodl it there, just for kicks.

You may or may not have a system that is going to pay off, so I would not want to be perceived as talking you out of anything, even though perhaps, any of us can sometimes tweak our approach and even our inclinations towards risk taking by sharing information in threads (conversations) like these can help each of us to better help ourselves.  Even though I have spouted a lot of nonsense through the years through this thread, I feel that my own participation has assisted me to learn more about my own strategies by my attempting to explain some of the things that I think and do.


If you have any interest, maybe we can continue the altcoin talk in private chat, don't want to spam this thread with it. I would just like to disclose what alts I have and why I have them.

Cheers!

Maybe some other thread participants would be interested in brainstorming with you about some of your alt coin picks and strategies and the reason why, but I have no interest in getting distracted by any non-bitcoin projects.  I agree with you that there are crypto projects that have decent chances to have legs as non scams, and even they might tie back to bitcoin or become folded into bitcoin in various ways - however, I have real difficulties appreciating or participating in thoughts about how various other projects might be profitable, because surely a lot of them sound good in theory, yet frequently I still wonder why they need their own coin or their own blockchain rather than being built upon or in complimentary style to bitcoin.... So tangentially, I do sometimes learn about some of these kinds of projects and attempt to figure out how they might be building in compliment to bitcoin rather than as a brain drain and financial drain distraction.

Also, personally I believe that to the extent that you can describe various crypto projects as complimentary (rather than attack vectors on bitcoin), then those topics might be relevant to this thread, even though patience is likely to wear thin if you devolve too far and the connection to bitcoin becomes a lot less apparent, then seemingly rightly so, a large number of participants in this thread will begin to attack you as being pumping some shit or attacking bitcoin, and you seem to recognize these kinds of topical thread dynamics, Kylapoiss.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile

2. Who gives a XXXX


we use a thing called language here...it is for communicating

bye bye

Oh come on. That's a bit harsh. Take it easy.  Smiley
"crypto is electronic currency" and my personal welcome "Your welcome" already made my day.
Apparently the previous IQ discussion is still relevant. Legendary...

yeah apologies for the language, obviously did not realise it was part of T&C

appreciate the discussion

no anger intended

Jump to: