....No, it wasn't me who lost coins. I think a recent situation like this happened to either OutOfMemory or sirazimuth, IIRC. It can happen to anyone, and, let's face it, Bitcoin has radically changed the way we handle and protect our cash (of the digital variety, a.k.a. BTC). Even those of us who are very computer-literate can end up in situations like this, and you're right in that I've made several posts in the past emphasizing that fact........
To be clear, yes, I lost about half a bitcoin, about $200 in value at the time, (or something like that, I cant remember, 9 years ago) but it had nothing to do with being hacked.
I have never lost a single satoshi from a hack.
Nuff said.
It seems to me that the longer that we are in bitcoin and probably the more kinds of activities that we are engaged in with our coins, the more opportunities that we have to lose coins.. and I am not even necessarily referring to getting involved in shitcoins, which could be another way to lose coins. One of the good things about having had accumulated more than enough coins, the losses sometimes will just feel like a part of doing business.. but at the same time, there can be some painful thoughts in regards to how to potentially prevent the same kinds of losses - and is it worth it to go down certain paths, maybe even becoming a bit of a bitcoin recluse - and not interacting with our coins in the world, to potentially be more safe.
I don't deny the existence of security through obscurity as one of the potentially valuable parts... and surely I still think that there are a lot of difficult things with bitcoin, and trying to figure out ways to help some of the newer folks in onboarding and practicing somewhat safe practices.. at least safe enough that they kind of have some ideas regarding how one way of holding coins might be preferable and figuring out why some kinds of practices are adding risks that might be lessened with some safer practices and better organization.
There are so many folks who don't even have a back up of their phone, and I am sometimes having trouble blaming them, but it seems that some kinds of back ups should be in practice for all of our data, even though surely the kind of data that has monetary value attached to it. and in the current subject we are talking about bitcoin serving as a kind of monetary value that is attached to data, and so the value being attached to the data contributes towards justifications to get more serious about our data, especially our bitcoin data... seems so abstract, and it kind of is, but when feeling the HLB that it can help to materialize, some of the abstractness might start to feel more concreteness.
Yeah, i lost a ledger, but easily restored the keys using a new one.
And my first transaction was hijacked by malware. 0,1 BTC, early 2017.
Oh, a Ledger eh?.. That's another naughty word on this here famous thread, but hey, at least it doesn't start with the letter "c", so there is that.
Hahahaha.. you had not noticed the first time that OOM had mentioned the Ledger incident in order that you could bond with him over your Ledger commonality. OOM did receive a bit of a lecture on the matter, and not sure if he might be considering switching, but if he ended up buying another Ledger then sure, he is in a similar camp as you.. not exactly the same camp, but similar.. we are each unique little flowers
(doesn't flower sound nicer than snowflake?), by the way... so no flower is going to tell another flower what to do, even though "we"
(the other flowers) may well choose to lecture your little fartie flowery ass.