Explain why you think that statement is true, and I will explain why you are wrong.
The graphic showed nodes which would be represented by the likes of Amazon, Bitcoin Exchanges and Banks as 'Massively connected Hubs'. Opening a channel with a massivly connected hub like Amazon, a bitcoin Exchange or a bank is more like depositing money with a bank than sending some bitcoin to another wallet, (a hot wallet if you like). I don't know how to explain it more clearly than that. Feel free to show me why I'm wrong. I'm often wrong about a great many things
Opening a channel is not the same as depositing money in a bank.
Depositing money implies you are trusting someone with your coins.
This is not the case, a channel is completely trustless.
In the entirety of a Lightning transaction there is no point at which an attacker can steal you coins. The worst that can happen, if they behave maliciously, is they force you to wait for a timeout, but at the end of the timeout you get all that is owed.
During the lifetime of a transaction and a channel, there is no point at which you need to trust any 3rd party.
If a 3rd party acts maliciously, they will effectively perform a denial of service attack upon you.
This DOS attack will damage the nodes/recipients reputation and so will probably not be a desirable course of action for them.
In the very rare instance where one is performed, you can simply make the transaction via a different route.
So I don't see how an comparison with a bank is valid.
Everyone needs to connect to the network via at least 1 node, possibly more, you are obviously going to connect to nodes with good onward connections, so the idea of hubs developing may well be valid, but the network topolgy claimed by Jonald Fyookball is completly unproven and the recent network diagrams from the Lightning testnet do not support it.
The big blockers have attacked Lightning at every turn, mostly without evidence and understanding, I suggest you retain an open mind until the network is up and running then we can judge it in reality.