Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1517. (Read 26707841 times)

I just had to search for this image, as the girl is truly heavenly beautiful.

It is AI-generated!

Just imagine the possibilities...

That is sweet, in your own kind of a way.  I suppose.


It seems to me that we should be prepared for either direction, and wishing for down (or hoping for down) seems like such a low coiner and/or no coiner kind of a move, and surely you have been in bitcoin enough time to have had prepared for UP.. but yeah, I do understand that it takes time to accumulate including if we have cashflow that is growing, then we might not have been able to invest as much fiat (in the past) as we might be able to invest now.



me

me

me.


 

whatever.  either way.  I am not going to get my hopes up. .but if it happens, it happens.  Can never really complain about premature uppity.. or uppity happening sooner than expected.. . not saying that I had any specific time frame in mind, but it would surely be shocking if we were able to reach an ATH prior to the happening.. maybe that should be a group wish for a premature expectation that may or may not end up playing out.


Hahahahahaha

Looks just like him.


You could at least put some names on the characters in order to give it some context.  You lazy and imprecise fuck.   

I totally agree with what you're saying. Physical keys don't mean anything in terms of house ownership. You missed what I was trying to say, and it looks like my house-key analogy may have been somewhat misleading...

Biodom suggested that our BTC is not truly ours, until we actually make a transaction using our keys and the transaction clears in the blockchain. Before that, our coins are in a "limbo" state, not truly owned by us. Something like how Schrödinger's cat is neither alive nor dead, until we peek inside the box. What he suggests has more of a philosophical than practical significance. I argued that code, math & science practically guarantee that our coins are really ours, even before we make a transaction.

In terms of my house-key example, think "house access" instead of "house ownership". Biodom suggests that we don't truly have access to our property, until we physically put the key in the lock and turn it to open the door. Before that, there is no guarantee that we have access. We get in, we have (and have proved we have) access; we leave the house, we lose the certainty of having access, until we turn that key again. Philosophically (even metaphysically) this theory may have some value, but not so much in a real-life, practical setting.

I hope it's now clearer.

We can all suspect what he had in mind by first posting an image of a girl in lingerie and then a gif where the reddit dude is polishing his rod.
Excuse him, his mind is elsewhere.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Don’t look at the mantlepiece when you’re poking the fire.

Those tattoed eyebrows!  They always make women look like clowns.
Nothing that big sunglasses can't fix, though 

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Not everybody but people like you who don't really like the merit distribution of El duderino_ and btw he's sending his own sendable merits then who are you to stop him from sending those sMerits? If we are here to have freedom of speech then we should have freedom of action as well and in that sense he's the owner of those merits and he can send those to anyone or any post he wants as long as the user who gets merits isn't a well-known spammer.

I don't think bringing someone like Nutildah is a right approach in such situations. The matter is between you and El duderino_ and bring someone else could be a nice excuse to add petrol on fire. I hope you won't be taking the arguments in further as those aren't worthy at all.

……….. those cheeks

You don't even need to default on your payments. They can expropriate your home if the land is required for a road, school, government building, etc, or even the condominium project of a developer who has sufficiently bribed lobbied the appropriate officials.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Yes bro
I will keep myself at CF and meriting BTC-contributors

True...sigh. Even if you pay the house off, you still have to pay property tax or they can take it away from you.

Until some government decides to expropriate "your" property and pay you what they decide.

Indeed, there is no real estate ownership. You just end up paying some one who can evict you for non-payment (a government) instead of a landlord or lender.

This is why addresses must be created on a computer which has no internet connectivity and printed on a printer that will never have internet access. Printer spooler buffers can be hacked.

Eh...apples and oranges.

With a house, whoever legally holds the deed owns the house, regardless of who owns the key. If you have a mortgage loan, you may have the key, but the bank owns the house...you just own the debt. If the deed is lost, there is still usually a backup trail of docs that correctly identify the last owner, who can still lay claim.

With bitcoin, the private key is the deed, and whoever holds it owns the bitcoin. As we have seen with CSW, (so far) a lawsuit can hardly prove otherwise. And if the private key is lost, no one owns the bitcoin, nor ever will again.

are you fucking kidding us?

reported

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Wait this one represents this Thread in more detail 🤭