1. He is a muddle headed millionaire. He's also an egotistical megalomaniac, "I was the first investor", I'm the biggest shareholder", "I know about economic code", "homogeneous is another word for privacy", etc, etc.
2. What did this "significant fraction" do? Ah yes, congested the network with spam to drive transaction fees up, which the muddle headed clown then proceeds to blame the core team for, banging on about a horrible user experience.
3. All is going according to plan? What, coordinated pumps of BCC at the same time as dumping BTC to drive the price of the shitcoin up so they get more BTC for it? Great plan, excellent.
Whoosh. There it goes. Over your head.
Anyways....
Of course, I realized the implication was about Roger Ver. Here's the thing though. Roger had zero to do with the creation of Bitcoin ABC, which ended up the catalyst that kicked this big block initiative over the hump. Sure, he likes it, but
he was not -- and is not -- a driving force to its creation. This is a team effort. By a rather large team. Hence my comment about this here echo chamber.
Yes, it went right over my head that the people who are
offering forcing a solution to a problem are in fact the people who created the problem in the first place.
I have also failed to notice that you ignore this point, and the issue of blatant market manipulation because neither of these fit with your agenda.
And no, I am not BlindMayorBitcoin. Alt accounts and shills are a tactic more often employed by the BCC fanbase, so I can see how your mind may have become naturally suspicious.
Anyway...
