Did you panic sell on the DeepSeek dip, anon?
Anyone selling at this point doesn't know the importance of accumulation, as I know this little retracement should be a good means of topping the missing chances. WO are strong people and who have passion for strong hodling. Usually is short term pullback that will give momentum to the market for stability or trying to push above it's previous level, so anyone selling shouldn't belong here imo. What do you think?
I think that we have a variety of types in these here parts, including traders and panic sellers, even though it seems that most of us seem to lean towards investing, hodling and accumulating, yet surely guys will still have variations of their preferences.
There are a few shitcoiners here too, and perhaps we are most hostile to shitcoiners... yet there are a few that still squeak out that shitcoiner nonsense, which there might be some needs to reinvigorate some the hostility, even lame ass terms like CSR rather than BSR might have to be battled around, even though the administration seems to be using that term, yet I doubt that creates a license to just speak and vague gobbledy-gook and pump various shitcoins, even if the US Govt might end up being dumb enough (or is that retarded enough?) to include some shitcoins in its reserves, in the event reserves (or stockpile) are actually created.
Perhaps more importantly though, believing things have objective value often leads to very real errors in the evaluation of particular circumstances.
You believe that you have no errors if you completely evaluate every thing ONLY from the perspective of subjective value?
No. That would be a logical fallacy. That X leads to errors does not imply that errors can't be made under Y. Believing that there are 11 inches in a foot will lead to faulty construction but it's still possible to build a faulty wall with functional measurements, of course.
In other words, you are the winner of the argument.
Winner, winner chicken dinner, but that still does not mean that I am going to concede.
I will stick with my seemingly lame-ass faulty attempts at continuing to just say no to 100% subjective value.
Other than this mischaracterization, I don't really see anything you wrote that refutes what I said so I'm happy to leave it there. (Plus I'm happy to plant seeds. The Eureka moment can come later).
I am glad that you still see some hope in me and my future potentials.
I see the belief in objective value to be like the belief that things accelerate due to gravity at 9.8m/s/s (32ft/s/s). It seems true because it's something that's always been present in our perception but a change in situation reveals it to be circumstantial. In the same way, many people think a dollar is a dollar (though the insane inflation recently has started to chip away at that too). I guess I didn't quite leave it there so I'll leave it here instead.
I am glad that you are letting up upon the sheer beating that you have been lashing out in my direction, even though from my potentially naive point of view, you seem to be referencing slightly different things, since I would think that perceptions of value would be part of subjective value, so that folks could be wrong in their subjective values which might be different from their being wrong in their perceptions about various aspects of reality that end up that our reality is different than we perceived it to be , which seems to be nearly arguing my point... that there is some kind of reality about what is gravity (that changes depending on context) and perhaps due to information asymmetry we have false ideas regarding why the dollar has value or not, yet I doubt that in either the case of gravity or the value of the dollar that you are presenting an argument that the value is completely subjective, even though there would be stronger arguments that more aspects of the dollar involves subjective value as compared to our perceptions of gravity or various aspects of gravity having differing characteristics if we are put into some other kind of environment in which it ended up changing due to forces outside of ourselves and we may or may not perceive the changes to gravity under the new context..
and sometimes we might not realize the effects of money printer go burr.. but suppose each (gravity and the dollar) has subjective and objective potentials for both value and truth even though you are proclaiming that any value related to those concepts and practices are completely and 100% subjective.. and maybe we are arguing over your definition of subjective to the extent it is relevant.... since you are proclaiming subjective value to be the mother upon which all other values flow, supposedly.
I don't buy it, even if I might not have had defended my position adequately, but it seems to me that I don't have any obligation to defend my position. I am going to continue to build my 11 inch houses, until such aw haaa moment strikes me into a higher state of enlightenment (but I won't be holding my breath, either).