Blocksize was never meant to be some resource that could be controlled by anybody.
Let Bitcoin scale already.
Make Bitcoin Great Again!
Finally, you make one out of three points that makes some sense.
1mb blocksize limits is the current state of bitcoin.. that is correct, and bitcoin was not meant to be easily changed. Therefore, 1mb blocksize limits seem to be the status quo going forward until there is some kind of convincing evidence and/or argument(s) that allows for it to be adapted in some kind of way, whether that is through seg wit or blocksize increases or any other "scaling" way forward.
What's your angle?
My angle meaning what?
I already stated what I thought, no?
In essence, I agree with any point that the current bitcoin system is established as a secure decentralized immutable way to store and transfer value. If what bitcoin "is" is undermined by some kind of centralized system or manipulation or FUD that allows for such undermining of bitcoin "as it is", then that would be problematic.
My angle remains that XT, Classic and now BU are either aimed or have effects that are attempting to undermine bitcoin "as is"... ... so we will see how all of that plays out, and whether bitcoin is going to be able to preserve its value in one form or another regarding a secure decentralized and immutable system that allows for the storage and transferring of value
Okay let's remove any possibility of ambiguity then.
Are you against increasing the transfer capacity of the bitcoin network, yes or no? Just yes or no.
no
So why do you want to stay at the current 1 MB? You can't have it both ways.
First of all. You edited out my answer.
Second of all, you are planting assumptions about my position based on information that I did not provide.
In other words, you are not really attempting to engage in any kind of meaningful interaction but instead wanting to disseminate your own talking points and to falsely attribute positions to others (isn't that called, creation of a strawman?)
well he does have a point.. it is hard to interact with people who want to stay at the 1MB block size for obvious reasons.
what is his point exactly?
Who gives a shit what I want? It does not matter, and I am not saying what I want.
I am merely saying that the big blockers are saying that they want something else. They want bigger blocks, and I am following whatever there is.
So don't be shifting this discussion into what I want because what I want does not matter.
I am not proposing any change or arguing for a change, and the burden of production and the burden of persuasion remains in the hands of those who are advocating a change, and currently, those happen to be the big blocker goofballs who are advocating for raising the blocksize limit.