[edited out]
cmon m8, enough of the scam crap,lol what if Dr Craig Wright was Satoshi and he had 1mill BTC, does that make BTC a scam?
The scam crap is real when it comes to ethereum, so even if there has been nearly a 6 month long pump of ethereum, and there have been a lot of innocent folks piling onto it, that does not take away from it's scam fundamentals. Merely because I am calling ETH a scam does not mean that it is not contributing to the crypto space in a variety of ways. For example, it has drawn considerable interest, and there are likely some very creative people attempting to figure out innovations. Furthermore, it likely provides a kind of vehicle in which government and financial institutions can invest and attempt to denigrate bitcoin through such ploys, but in the end, Bitcoin is very likely to continue to grow stronger.
Regarding your hypothetical point about Craig Wright being Satoshi.. such a what-if is nearly pure fantasy land.. yeah it was in the news, and yeah it got a lot of attention, but the mere fact that such a ridiculous claim got a lot of attention, and even temporarily caused negative price movement should not seriously be considered to be some kind of event that we should take into account. But, yeah, if some goofball, such as craig wright had access or appeared to have access to 1 million bitcoin, that would surely be a bearish kind of fantasy world outcome.. but it is just that fantasy world... At this time, there are no tangible, material and/or convincing facts to back up such ridiculous speculation.
Its like sayin i only drink coke, so i wont touch pepsi, lol
Crypto evolves just like everything else.
Theres no harm if you hold both lol
I hope your in the one in a mill club....21BTC and 100ETH, or more
All these above points, attempt to make convolute Ethereum matters in such a way as to suggest that it is something very similar to bitcoin. I shouldn't have to repeat that Ethereum is missing something concrete, which makes it an item of a different category, and the part it is missing is: decentralized, immutable permissionless. And that makes a considerable difference. Bitcoin has it, and no other crypto has it in any kind of meaningful way... therefore, attempting to make equivalents is misleading and deceptive and possibly devolving into disingenuousness (which you are starting to come across as, when you continue to persist with these false equivalency claims in this bitcoin thread)
oh also as for the centralised -decentrise stuff, yes your right.
But there is now a choice
Yes ETH is prob designed for business use
Billion$ businesses and banks that want involved in crypto can call the ETH team direct and recieve advice ( r3 report example )
Who do they call if they want to use btc?
Soon Rootstock will offer ETH style service which many of you are looking forward too, what then does BTC become partially centralised too?
Buy both be happy
This last added point adds no extra value.. and pretty much agrees with my point about ETH being a coopted kind of deception.