Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19395. (Read 26609705 times)
February 09, 2016, 02:46:20 AM
Oh, marriedtothesea, you little rascal you...
February 09, 2016, 02:01:22 AM
February 09, 2016, 01:01:17 AM
February 09, 2016, 12:37:10 AM
Most downvoted comment in the whole thread. Woot?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
pretty sure Gavin has been operating under the influence of a NSL since not long after his trip to the CIA ... his actions are sometimes directly opposite of what he says, his whole behaviour and demeanour screams like a warrant canary, it's like he's shaking his head and saying Yes! all the time.
This theory actually makes sense.
Yes, I think the zionists may be involved as well.
February 09, 2016, 12:19:29 AM
Most downvoted comment in the whole thread. Woot?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
pretty sure Gavin has been operating under the influence of a NSL since not long after his trip to the CIA ... his actions are sometimes directly opposite of what he says, his whole behaviour and demeanour screams like a warrant canary, it's like he's shaking his head and saying Yes! all the time.
This theory actually makes sense.
February 09, 2016, 12:01:20 AM
February 08, 2016, 11:01:21 PM
February 08, 2016, 10:59:30 PM
comment score below threshold
February 08, 2016, 10:49:53 PM
Most downvoted comment in the whole thread. Woot?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
pretty sure Gavin has been operating under the influence of a NSL since not long after his trip to the CIA ... his actions are sometimes directly opposite of what he says, his whole behaviour and demeanour screams like a warrant canary, it's like he's shaking his head and saying Yes! all the time.
February 08, 2016, 10:38:46 PM
February 08, 2016, 10:36:01 PM
Most downvoted comment in the whole thread. Woot?
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/44qvoz/has_blockstream_received_a_nsl/
February 08, 2016, 10:27:52 PM
i have awesome strategy for bitcoin . we'll play out the "bitcoin doesn't scale" thing and we will, in the end, do nothing.... some have said that will kill bitcoin .. it will be alright because everyone here has other investments and are only trading with money they don't really need anyways.. that is the prime rule of bitcoin .. only buy bitcoins with what you can afford to lose. and there we go #problemsolved
The rule with any risky investment is that you cover all of your basic necessities first, and plan ahead a bit.
Accordingly, anything you invest is extra money.
Yes, you could take that "extra money" and spend it on a vacation or another investment, but you proportion all of your "extra money" in such a way that hopefully in the end, the various investments grow rather than shrink... and bitcoin is one portion of that total investment package and philosophy. Bitcoin is not the only investment that governing philosophy : "invest no more than you can afford to lose."
In other words, you should not be doing too much if any leveraging with your investments (except maybe to the extent that you are leveraging a variety of investments - rather than leveraging your home or leveraging your next 10 years of income or leveraging your food money).
February 08, 2016, 10:13:52 PM
Segwit is more like 1.3MB equiv, to 1.75MB equiv in a rosy scenario. It also gives a heavy discount to signature heavy transactions like the vaporous LN. Most importantly, the "soft" fork method allows no room for protest at the node level.
It has the added "benefit" of leaving all non segwit nodes in a half broken state, not able to fully validate. All done without their request or permission.
It has the added "benefit" of leaving all non segwit nodes in a half broken state, not able to fully validate. All done without their request or permission.
way to understate segwit.
1.75x incess is HUGE!
scaling bitcoin isnt about how big we can make the blocks, but how efficiently we can use block space
Thats a bit mad really, isn't it?
Needing to use space more efficiently, when in reality its not in short supply at all. Except that it is decided to be.
And by increasing complexity? hmmmm.
1st world problems, eh?
You seem to be very short-sighted if you are suggesting that increasing the block size is some trivial matter because it is "just a tiny increase" and "we have all kinds of space", blah blah blah
The fact of the matter may be that there is a bit of luxury with such a discussion, but the impact of rash considerations, such as increasing the block size has impacts on participation and really on lots of people, who may become foreclosed from participation because of technology and technological demands.
Your apparent poo poo-ing the problem seems to demonstrate more that you are caught up in first world concerns, rather than the direction of your criticism of others who are trying to keep bit coin from becoming too big too fast and too centralized...
February 08, 2016, 10:01:18 PM
February 08, 2016, 09:08:57 PM
...
Is China in the 1st world? Blocks sizes is a China issue. Actually a China government issue, cause firewall.
Is China in the 1st world? Blocks sizes is a China issue. Actually a China government issue, cause firewall.
Dunno. But depending so heavily on Chinese miners -- that's a Bitcoin issue
chinese new year now, but chinese miners aren't shutting down the machines to let the workers to have their celebration.
the holidays does not affect their mine, you know, it needs a long time to shutdown or setup.
February 08, 2016, 09:01:19 PM
February 08, 2016, 08:34:09 PM
...
Is China in the 1st world? Blocks sizes is a China issue. Actually a China government issue, cause firewall.
Is China in the 1st world? Blocks sizes is a China issue. Actually a China government issue, cause firewall.
Dunno. But depending so heavily on Chinese miners -- that's a Bitcoin issue
February 08, 2016, 08:32:50 PM
^The ladies love it. 
'My wallet is 60GB and growing every 10 minutes. But I got great band-width'
This line works a treat, especially if target lady being chatted up is pissed and she mishears.
February 08, 2016, 08:27:37 PM
Segwit is more like 1.3MB equiv, to 1.75MB equiv in a rosy scenario. It also gives a heavy discount to signature heavy transactions like the vaporous LN. Most importantly, the "soft" fork method allows no room for protest at the node level.
It has the added "benefit" of leaving all non segwit nodes in a half broken state, not able to fully validate. All done without their request or permission.
It has the added "benefit" of leaving all non segwit nodes in a half broken state, not able to fully validate. All done without their request or permission.
way to understate segwit.
1.75x incess is HUGE!
scaling bitcoin isnt about how big we can make the blocks, but how efficiently we can use block space
Thats a bit mad really, isn't it?
Needing to use space more efficiently, when in reality its not in short supply at all. Except that it is decided to be.
And by increasing complexity? hmmmm.
1st world problems, eh?
Is China in the 1st world? Blocks sizes is a China issue. Actually a China government issue, cause firewall.
February 08, 2016, 08:20:35 PM
^The ladies love it.
Jump to: