Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 20163. (Read 26656679 times)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Humans are not logical creatures with feelings. We are emotional animals with the ability to rationalize. Forget your fantasies and focus on reality. Racism is a core part of what makes humans human, and those who lack it will be replaced by those who do.

Sure, we aren't robots (thankfully) but if you're not indoctrinated in a vulnerable phase when your mind is still in formation, that is, during childhood, you probably won't blow yourself up because a fantasy book says that you'll get 7 (77?) virgins at your disposal if you kill "infidels".
From a group-competitive perspective, it makes perfect sense. One of theirs for a dozen or more of ours is a good deal, evolutionary speaking.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
all in b4 massive pump of all time.

Hm?  not sure if I see it.   Undecided
hero member
Activity: 748
Merit: 500
all in b4 massive pump of all time.

Oh shit, down we'll go Grin
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
Humans are not logical creatures with feelings. We are emotional animals with the ability to rationalize. Forget your fantasies and focus on reality. Racism is a core part of what makes humans human, and those who lack it will be replaced by those who do.

Sure, we aren't robots (thankfully) but if you're not indoctrinated in a vulnerable phase when your mind is still in formation, that is, during childhood, you probably won't blow yourself up because a fantasy book says that you'll get 7 (77?) virgins at your disposal if you kill "infidels".
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
"Now the whole world stands on the brink staring down into bloody hell. All those liberals, and intellectuals, and smooth-talkers; and all of a sudden no one can think of anything to say."

Nah, won't be like that at all. You'll still be a bitter, angry little shit. Some black d00d will prob'ly make you his bitch, without Nanny State to protect you Smiley
It is amazing how you rabbits project. I understand that it is an instinctive defense mechanism to keep from losing your mind, but I never quite get used to it.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though.

It'd be nice, but a world free of terrorism is unlikely. If the relevant state vigilance is weak results of this kind are inevitable.

It is unlikely in any case. I'm especially wary of unchecked immigration. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm an immigrant myself and have counted amongst my friends people from many races, cultures and religions and celebrate many of the things that exist in my life because of it. Assimilation is key though and France especially has allowed enclaves to develop where ideals that run counter to the ethos of western secularism have been allowed to build. Any realistic level of vigilance less than panopticon-levels will have trouble with that.

I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.
Humans are not logical creatures with feelings. We are emotional animals with the ability to rationalize. Forget your fantasies and focus on reality. Racism is a core part of what makes humans human, and those who lack it will be replaced by those who do.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.

Humans are regular animals.  Dogs bark at themselves in the mirror for no reason.  Some people do similar things.  The ones who try to classify humans as some type of creature far above the scope of the common animal will be the first to die once the Obama economy implodes.  In the words of The Watchmen movie, "Now the whole world stands on the brink staring down into bloody hell. All those liberals, and intellectuals, and smooth-talkers; and all of a sudden no one can think of anything to say."



Stop drugs and talk about bitcoin please.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.

Humans are regular animals.  Dogs bark at themselves in the mirror for no reason.  Some people do similar things.  The ones who try to classify humans as some type of creature far above the scope of the common animal will be the first to die once the fractional reserve, fiat scam system implodes.  In the words of The Watchmen movie, "Now the whole world stands on the brink staring down into bloody hell. All those liberals, and intellectuals, and smooth-talkers; and all of a sudden no one can think of anything to say."

full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 100

What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't.

Since the Caucasian genes are recessive, this is how it turns out nearly every single time in these kinds of offspring, the child looks nothing like the white parent.  From a strict biological and natural selection point of view, the purpose of reproduction is solely to spread your genes into the future.  In the scenario above, what she has done is basically pass on her genes as non-influential junk DNA, while the African genes determined almost the entire outcome of the child where it doesn't resemble one of the parents at all.

Of course there will be tons of Marxists coming along to claim that mentioning African genes are dominant and Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "da raycism", because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that whatever genes compromise the recessive groups would basically be made extinct by full integration between all groups.  This infuriates the common Marxist because it blows the lid off their fake narrative where those groups of people tend to constantly push for things like conservation of variety in animal species, yet they would be pushing for the exact opposite in this case, the extinction of the recessive groups on purpose.


Bottom line: Klum is still totally bangable.

and her daughter may well wind up even hotter than her when she grows up
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though.

It'd be nice, but a world free of terrorism is unlikely. If the relevant state vigilance is weak results of this kind are inevitable.

It is unlikely in any case. I'm especially wary of unchecked immigration. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm an immigrant myself and have counted amongst my friends people from many races, cultures and religions and celebrate many of the things that exist in my life because of it. Assimilation is key though and France especially has allowed enclaves to develop where ideals that run counter to the ethos of western secularism have been allowed to build. Any realistic level of vigilance less than panopticon-levels will have trouble with that.

I subscribe everything you said. The real solution would be eradicating relics which should be consigned to the dustbin of history: namely fanaticism and religion (any religion) through reason, but this is my very own point of view and far less likely.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
...
Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't. ...

To be that deluded Smiley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heroin_chic

http://www.pariscultureguide.com/images/Peter_Paul_Rubens-Venus_in_Front_of_the_Mirror-c.1613-14.jpg

And I'm sure other c0ckroaches find you attractive Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116

What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't.

Since the Caucasian genes are recessive, this is how it turns out nearly every single time in these kinds of offspring, the child looks nothing like the white parent.  From a strict biological and natural selection point of view, the purpose of reproduction is solely to spread your genes into the future.  In the scenario above, what she has done is basically pass on her genes as non-influential junk DNA, while the African genes determined almost the entire outcome of the child where it doesn't resemble one of the parents at all.

Of course there will be tons of Marxists coming along to claim that mentioning African genes are dominant and Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "da raycism", because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that whatever genes compromise the recessive groups would basically be made extinct by full integration between all groups.  This infuriates the common Marxist because it blows the lid off their fake narrative where those groups of people tend to constantly push for things like conservation of variety in animal species, yet they would be pushing for the exact opposite in this case, the extinction of the recessive groups on purpose.


Bottom line: Klum is still totally bangable.

You mean Heidi. Right?
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though.

It'd be nice, but a world free of terrorism is unlikely. If the relevant state vigilance is weak results of this kind are inevitable.

It is unlikely in any case. I'm especially wary of unchecked immigration. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm an immigrant myself and have counted amongst my friends people from many races, cultures and religions and celebrate many of the things that exist in my life because of it. Assimilation is key though and France especially has allowed enclaves to develop where ideals that run counter to the ethos of western secularism have been allowed to build. Any realistic level of vigilance less than panopticon-levels will have trouble with that.
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100

What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't.

Since the Caucasian genes are recessive, this is how it turns out nearly every single time in these kinds of offspring, the child looks nothing like the white parent.  From a strict biological and natural selection point of view, the purpose of reproduction is solely to spread your genes into the future.  In the scenario above, what she has done is basically pass on her genes as non-influential junk DNA, while the African genes determined almost the entire outcome of the child where it doesn't resemble one of the parents at all.

Of course there will be tons of Marxists coming along to claim that mentioning African genes are dominant and Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "da raycism", because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that whatever genes compromise the recessive groups would basically be made extinct by full integration between all groups.  This infuriates the common Marxist because it blows the lid off their fake narrative where those groups of people tend to constantly push for things like conservation of variety in animal species, yet they would be pushing for the exact opposite in this case, the extinction of the recessive groups on purpose.


Bottom line: Klum is still totally bangable.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'?  So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't.  That is totally subjective.

Contrary to what fat pride and other whacko groups try to claim, "beauty" is not even close to entirely subjective.  Symmetry and attributes that define health are obvious objective standards of looks, probably plenty more exist.  I hate to break it to you, but the world in general will unanimously agree which child received the supermodel genes and which didn't.

Since the Caucasian genes are recessive, this is how it turns out nearly every single time in these kinds of offspring, the child looks nothing like the white parent.  From a strict biological and natural selection point of view, the purpose of reproduction is solely to spread your genes into the future.  In the scenario above, what she has done is basically pass on her genes as non-influential junk DNA, while the African genes determined almost the entire outcome of the child where it doesn't resemble one of the parents at all.

Of course there will be tons of Marxists coming along to claim that mentioning African genes are dominant and Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "da raycism", because it doesn't take a genius to figure out that whatever genes compromise the recessive groups would basically be made extinct by full integration between all groups.  This infuriates the common Marxist because it blows the lid off their fake narrative where those groups of people tend to constantly push for things like conservation of variety in animal species, yet they would be pushing for the exact opposite in this case, the extinction of the recessive human groups on purpose.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
all in b4 massive pump of all time.
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though.

It'd be nice, but a world free of terrorism is unlikely. If the relevant state vigilance is weak results of this kind are inevitable.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k

Simply saying "you are wrong" is no argument either. Wrong how? How does it actually work?

If you don't want to have a discussion, simply don't. But you are here now.

Recessive genes are not eliminated by breeding but are passed on just the same as dominant genes. It is only in their expression that it makes a difference. In future generations, recessive genes may recombine to once again be expressed phenotypically.

Genes increase or decrease through natural selection which will depend on many other factors.

That's as far as I'm willing to go explaining grade school science. Especially in a thread about the price of Bitcoin.

Here, have it as a link since Google is apparently just too much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punnett_square
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
So again, what are you suggesting? What should be done? Something practical this time, if you please.

Switch the military tactic from offence to mostly defence; more competent intelligence; more stringent checks at the border to reject suspects.
Jump to: