What is clear is that the argument that small block size prevents centralization is a bogus argument. Routing around the xaction limit reintroduces trusted third parties. These smallblockers are not defending the true decentralized vision of the project. Just the opposite is the case. They want to take power away from the end users (the customers) and give it to the employees (the miners). Whether or not the owners (hodlers) like that idea is going to be reflected in the charts.
Let's leave it to people who understand Bitcoin to discuss these issues, shall we?
Easy. 1/21,000,000th of the whole chain. I answered your question, now you answer mine. If I'm not buying space on the blockchain when I'm buying bitcoin, what am I buying?
As many times as you've quoted me, you've never refuted my argument. You know damn well I wasn't being literal, as I've repeated many times. But yes, the hodlers are the owners as the bitshares network make more clear by having a less confusing name for the trading tokens.
How many coins you got, Fucktard? Are you an owner or a miner employee? Who do you think buys those coins if not people like me? Who do you think is going to use a hobby network with a 7 TPS capacity when the transaction costs (currently around $4) go unsubsidized? Hell, even ACH is cheaper than that.