Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 20634. (Read 26608950 times)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1034
look good ... china, we invite you if you want ?  



Is it just me or are we seeing green?Huh

Hold on to your seatbelts everyone, I think this rollercoaster is finally headed up!!
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
look good ... china, we invite you if you want ?  

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100

Sorry, I dont understand, why?

People were getting worked up about the first one with ideas that some asshole trader would buy all of them and then dump all tens of thousands of them on the market.

In the end they probably went above market to one guy who had no intention of selling and the leaked list of bidding interest revealed some serious heavyweights. For the second auction there was an equally impressive bunch of people.

The auctions are copper bottomed opportunities for buyers to large quantities of coins well away from all the shitty exchanges. They go into the safest hands and that's what people were getting jumpy about with the first one. I think that notion is well and truly disproven and anyone who thinks otherwise can't be arsed to apply some actual logic.
I understand, thank you very much for your explanation.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht

Sorry, I dont understand, why?

People were getting worked up about the first one with ideas that some asshole trader would buy all of them and then dump all tens of thousands of them on the market.

In the end they probably went above market to one guy who had no intention of selling and the leaked list of bidding interest revealed some serious heavyweights. For the second auction there was an equally impressive bunch of people.

The auctions are copper bottomed opportunities for buyers to large quantities of coins well away from all the shitty exchanges. They go into the safest hands and that's what people were getting jumpy about with the first one. I think that notion is well and truly disproven and anyone who thinks otherwise can't be arsed to apply some actual logic.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.

It was weak, I'm with you. Besides if Satoshi wanted to tell us something he still has his account here. But nope. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.


funny how the XTards praising on satoshi's 3 worded 'vision' from its WP to bloat the blockchain with their coffee tips can't help but continuously reject the last email because it does not fit their twisted little minds.

yet nobody knows if it is him, and he certainly does not have to gpg verify jack shit for you noobs to blindly flock around like the daddy issues wannabes you all seems to be.



cool down bro. seems you are a bit stressed.
u might want to take some cash from your profits and go for an blow and stuff.

sex makes happy.

 Cool
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.

Cryptsy now LIVE for preorder of Cryptsy Worldwide Debit MasterCard!!!

https://www.cryptsy.com/campaign

FIRST 2,000 VERIFIED USERS TO SIGN UP GET WITHDRAWAL DISCOUNT ON WITHDRAWAL FEE FOR LIFE!!!

FIRST 2,000 VERIFIED USERS TO SIGN UP GET 30 DAYS FREE PROTRADER ACCOUNT TRIAL.

$10 USD TO SAVE YOUR SPOT AND GET YOUR CRYPTSY BRANDED DEBIT MASTERCARD, HURRY!!!




https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12722814
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.


funny how the XTards praising on satoshi's 3 worded 'vision' from its WP to bloat the blockchain with their coffee tips can't help but continuously reject the last email because it does not fit their twisted little minds.

yet nobody knows if it is him, and he certainly does not have to gpg verify jack shit for you noobs to blindly flock around like the daddy issues wannabes you all seems to be.


So you are completely blind to the inconsistency I pointed out?

Yes, I'm completely blind to your inconsistencies. Sry.
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100

FBI auction... btr from mtgox... 200$ are coming

Gox, who knows? FBI auction, fuck all happened with the other ones. I predict super intense fuck allness for that one.
Sorry, I dont understand, why?
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.


funny how the XTards praising on satoshi's 3 worded 'vision' from its WP to bloat the blockchain with their coffee tips can't help but continuously reject the last email because it does not fit their twisted little minds.

yet nobody knows if it is him, and he certainly does not have to gpg verify jack shit for you noobs to blindly flock around like the daddy issues wannabes you all seems to be.


So you are completely blind to the inconsistency I pointed out?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.


funny how the XTards praising on satoshi's 3 worded 'vision' from its WP to bloat the blockchain with their coffee tips can't help but continuously reject the last email because it does not fit their twisted little minds.

yet nobody knows if it is him, and he certainly does not have to gpg verify jack shit for you noobs to blindly flock around like the daddy issues wannabes you all seems to be.

legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

Of course you and gmaxwell thought so.

But for the rest of us it looks a bit silly that either satoshi or the guy/girl hacking his account used satoshis authority to thrash xt at the same time as he/she asks people not to be swayed by authority.

The person who wrote that PoS must be an idiot. I hope it's not Satoshi. I'd like to think he is smarter than that.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1046
Yea but i think bitcoin will still stay in 260$ until this january... maybe it will rise. I have no rights to change the speculation...
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
so apprently i missed some big shit in my inactivity the last couple months...

bitcoin xt? satoshi actually posting something on the dev mailing list? wow.

and here the price action is going all interesting places.

interesting times indeed.


Bitcoin XT was a dud. "Satoshi" posting was likely the hacker that hacked his e-mail account last year.


no, that was not the same account. the one satoshi used on this matter seems legit as far as the story goes.

in any case, nobody knows, so let cut the hacker crap and focus on the message rather than the messenger, as i personally found it well written and quite insightful.

It was fucking bullshit. The language and syntax were completely different from anything we know Satoshi wrote.  The argument was bogus too.  The blocksize limit does not improve security. It does not stop spam. It makes the network less vulnerable to one type of spam and more vulnerable to another type.  The other argument was equally bad. Core devs are not gods. Consensus is not only not always possible. It's not always even desirable.

It should be clear by now that we are the victims of a Rough Consensus Attack.  Satoshi designed an electronic cash system, not some bulletproof digital settlement system.  Bitcoin cannot give power to the people if it is inaccessible to the people.  Security is an important feature, but so is usability. If it doesn't scale, then it can't remain distributed and decentralized.  We can't take on the banks with a network that is only useful to banks. These are disingenuous arguments used by people arguing in bad faith.  


heh, thx for yet again sharing the light as to what a total brain damaged victimized whatnot would say.

how's your XTurd doing btw?
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht

FBI auction... btr from mtgox... 200$ are coming

Gox, who knows? FBI auction, fuck all happened with the other ones. I predict super intense fuck allness for that one.
Jump to: