Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 2080. (Read 26610404 times)

Explanation

Not to conservative

By may/June perhaps?

Explanation

You think he will stop at shitcoins...that's laughable.
Maybe a few people here should read the "First they came" poem by M. Niemoller...
...it's quite relevant despite a multitude of the opposite opinions on this forum.

Estes have starship as a flying model?

You can continue to do what you want. As soon as you use an official money transmitter, you have to do KYC from  a transfer sum of €1000.
That is the status today. So what will the future bring? 

Explanation

Says the guy who's been helping make laws for 140 years.

It’s the first correction we’ve had in a little bit, but it only wiped off a little over a week’s worth of gains. No reason to worry if it sticks around $28K for a while. It was expected to be choppy around $30K as the bulls reload for another moon shot to bring us back to around the $40K level, which I assume will be breached by the end of the year.

Explanation

Expected correction after a pretty incredible surge from $16,000 which was not really that long ago. Let’s hope we don’t go too much lower so we can consolidate and get pump hard into the end of Q2.

Explanation

Many of us likely can recognize a pattern that exists all around the world on a variety of levels in which various forms  of self-sustainability are discouraged, whether it comes to the ability to maintain your own garden (many times city codes have a lot of restrictions regarding the ability to have gardens or even animals in your yard - if you have a yard), and also many countries are prevented from being able to be self-sustaining, because dependencies are purposefully created in order to keep countries from being more independent and not providing specialized products into international markets.

Many patterns of control that are not necessarily friendly to individuals or to smaller entities in which people might become empowered by being able to be more self-sustaining.

Surely there are likely decent rationalizations why there are zoning laws, but they are not frequently for good reasons - beyond seeming to want to control citizens way more than necessary and to create a variety of dependencies on larger producers who are not even seeming to provide products that are necessarily as good as can be raised on more local levels, and I am not even saying that there are not efficiencies that are gained in some markets being able to mass produce, and surely even some of us regular people contribute to our own problem in the dynamic of incentives when we buy mass produced products/services because there is a certain appeal to what seems to be cheaper prices (and sometimes it can be a "pain in the ass" to actually deal with local people.. hahahahaha).

I am not even claiming to be except from these criticisms in my sometimes use of Amazon to buy things that I could more easily buy locally, and fuck it can frequently be inconvenient to have to go to the market or even the farmers market, and there are degrees of inconveniences that we cannot even necessarily know that it may well be better to go buy something used from a neighbor rather than the neighbor throwing things out.. and many folks prefer new things because who wants to deal with some of the used-items even if they might be higher quality products and in need of various kinds of servicing.

Oh yeah, and your point in regards to compost, I am not really that clear in regards to how to consider the matter, because surely I do not consider various kinds of city taxes to necessarily be unreasonable for providing a variety of services, and surely it costs them money to have to carry out various kinds of services, such as garbage removal whether those might be separated out as compost, recycle-ables, and regular garbage and other services that cities provide in terms of cleaning streets and even maintaining streets.. so there are surely some sacrifices when any of us live in tight quarters and the extent to which we even have the ability to maintain a garden/yard and surely there are a lot of restrictions in terms of even being able to use our own compost - if that were what we wanted to do in terms of if we were to be able to have our whole yard as a garden and an area to raise animals.. not that very many people even wants to do that kind of work anymore.. because it does not necessarily seem to pay as well as our own specializing in performing other kinds of services and just buying our food from the store rather than either raising it ourselves or having a helper (or various helpers - whether they are paid or not) to help to raise our food for us..


hahahahahaha


trolling poor widdo proudhon...     

Explanation

That's a fair interpretation hisslyness, and of course many of us longer term bitcoiners have personally experienced a variety of ways in which members have worked their own BTC accumulation levels - which includes the fact that sometimes we might conclude that being greedy is going to contribute towards our transitioning into richie status faster - even though at the same time, especially in recent times, we have witnessed a lot of reckening of folks who might ONLY have had been being aggressive in terms of allowing some of their coins to be held by third parties (perhaps because they wanted to earn yield) and then finding out that they did not have the coins that they thought that they had because either the third party had gambled away their coins or their coins had otherwise gotten locked up in financial insolvency proceedings.

Many of us have made mistakes along the way in terms of either being too aggressive, allowing too many coins stay with third parties, and surely there are a lot of folks who have also either been too whimpy or sold coins on the way up (sold too many too soon) and thought that they might be able to buy back cheaper.

So, yeah perhaps part of the lesson is that we do not need as many coins as we think that we might need in order to either arrive at an entry-level fuck you status or to prepare for entering into fuck you status at various time lines into the future.

I remain a bit concerned that I might be too aggressive in my own projection of our ongoing expectation that the bottom will continue to go up, and even though you can see that

The earliest portions of the chart, we had seen that the percentage per year that the bottom was going up was around 146.23% per year (in 2014) and then 64.22% per year (in 2020), 49.08% per year (in late 2022)  and then merely 19.09% per year (in 2033 - if you add the two 6-month periods together that you highlighted above), then we can see that I trying to project that the rate of the increase of the bottom price is going down, but am I still being too overly optimistic in terms of the arrived-at numbers for each of the subsequent years?  While at the same time, maybe I am allowing the amount of the increase to gravitate way too low, if I am projecting that the bottom is ONLY going to increase by 7.34% by the time we get to 2056, so surely there are some of the actual dynamics of UPpity of the BTC price bottom that are almost inevitably going to be incorrect because changes of a few percentage points in one direction or another would likely throw off the trajectory.. unless the numbers end up reverting back to the curve that I had projected at a later date (which would most likely become luck rather than based on any kind of scientific ability to predict the future beyond attempting to ballpark the matter)?

For reference (from my chart) below, I highlight each of the years mentioned above (and pretty much take the %gain/time x2 in order to arrive at the projected annual rate of increase of the projected BTC bottom price for each of the timelines).
               
>>>>
Date          RL_Price            BTCBottom            %gain/time       %Rate∆        $Amnt∆        Coins/FU Status
6/1/14           $644                $46.41                       73.13%           92.00%         $33.94                 43,098.5887
......
5/31/20          $9,472               $5,889.38                  32.11%           94.50%         $1,891.30                 339.5943
......
11/30/22         $17,164               $20,903.99                  24.59%           95.00%         $5,139.90                 95.67552464
......
5/31/33                                       $449,033.53                  9.69%           97.00%         $43,528.37                 4.45401035
11/29/33                                       $492,561.90                  9.40%           97.00%         $46,315.48                 4.06040335
.................
5/29/56                                       $5,639,679                  3.67%           99.00%         $206,870                      0.35463012
<<<<

₿𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: New research paper finds Bitcoin  mining is sustainable and helps decarbonize energy grids!
Full paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4347220
Download This Paper : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID4355022_code2247642.pdf?abstractid=4347220&mirid=1&type=2


source

Explanation

anybody knows if this affects non-custodial wallets and (private) onchain transfers?

Explanation

The MiCA regulation in Europa has passed the votes. It will take effect in 2024.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/04/20/eu-parliament-approves-crypto-licensing-funds-transfer-rules/