trollnuts
not 500 man. Would be cool if we could just hit like 300 and stay above, but current prices are good as well 
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 21064. (Read 26710135 times)
August 16, 2015, 12:50:18 AM
August 16, 2015, 12:19:30 AM
trollnuts
not 500 man. Would be cool if we could just hit like 300 and stay above, but current prices are good as well 
August 16, 2015, 12:02:51 AM
August 15, 2015, 11:51:29 PM
I really can see 500$ coming by next week. Leverage long seems like a no-brainer right now. I'm going to double down everytime now for every 10$ drop!
not 500 man. Would be cool if we could just hit like 300 and stay above, but current prices are good as well August 15, 2015, 11:45:25 PM
weekend discount of $5 - will be 265+ by monday. If $5 means anything to you then why not buy a few and make a sell wall at 265. Easy $5 per coin. 2% profit in one day (if you buy allot).
August 15, 2015, 11:35:57 PM
Come on Richy, you been around as long as anyone. What I do or don't doesn't make for a hill of beans. My hashpower amounts for as much as my vote, absolutely nothing.
My concern here is that if there is no scarcity of inclusion in the blocks, then there is no incentive to pay a fee. No fees, no incentive to mine.
It's pretty simple. If there does not exist enough monetary incentive to secure the network at a level larger than the potential reward for attacking the network, then we're toast. "Game over man, game over."
My concern here is that if there is no scarcity of inclusion in the blocks, then there is no incentive to pay a fee. No fees, no incentive to mine.
It's pretty simple. If there does not exist enough monetary incentive to secure the network at a level larger than the potential reward for attacking the network, then we're toast. "Game over man, game over."
It was the generic "you".
The point is, the miners get to choose which transactions to include in a block. There is nothing to stop someone from running mining software that would only include transactions with, say, a 0.5% fee minimum. Of course, they will be in competition with other miners so if miners are willing to include blocks with no fees, those transactions would be included. But by your definition, these miners would not exist because they would have no incentive to mine. This is the essence of a free market.
The artificial limit is like paying farmers not to plant crops.
August 15, 2015, 11:02:54 PM
August 15, 2015, 10:38:57 PM
We've all seen 260 before.
Gavin's XT isn't anything new...
People still expecting 255... but it hasn't happened yet.
If you want sub 260 coins go to BTC-e.
I think it's time for a bull run.
5k to 255 or 5k to 288? I vote up.
Bitcoin isn't gonna die just because Gavin Anderson wants to kill it for his own name.
Gavin's XT isn't anything new...
People still expecting 255... but it hasn't happened yet.
If you want sub 260 coins go to BTC-e.
I think it's time for a bull run.
5k to 255 or 5k to 288? I vote up.
Bitcoin isn't gonna die just because Gavin Anderson wants to kill it for his own name.
If the weekend sale is really over, then it looks pretty bullish. I really thought we'd go deeper, as $260 didn't seem like a strong support level. I've made no trades at all this week. Not enough volatility to punish.
August 15, 2015, 10:08:26 PM
We've all seen 260 before.
Gavin's XT isn't anything new...
People still expecting 255... but it hasn't happened yet.
If you want sub 260 coins go to BTC-e.
I think it's time for a bull run.
5k to 255 or 5k to 288? I vote up.
Bitcoin isn't gonna die just because Gavin Anderson wants to kill it for his own name.
Gavin's XT isn't anything new...
People still expecting 255... but it hasn't happened yet.
If you want sub 260 coins go to BTC-e.
I think it's time for a bull run.
5k to 255 or 5k to 288? I vote up.
Bitcoin isn't gonna die just because Gavin Anderson wants to kill it for his own name.
August 15, 2015, 10:03:06 PM
August 15, 2015, 09:10:42 PM
Thank you for your order sir, will it be gigacoin or cripplecoin?
Gigacoin please!
Ok, let's see, that would be 0.43 coins.
Oh shit, I have only the cripplecoin purse on me! Please recompute the ticket!
That's allright sir, we like to please everyone, in cripplecoin that would be 7.40!
Ah, thanks, I'll pay 7.45 including tip, sorry, I've had a hard time with XT lately, and my mistress left me.
That's ok, but just to inform you, in the future we will only take gigacoin, starting next week.
Shit, I sold them all!
Maybe you should not come here any more, sir. There is an excellent McDonalds just a few blocks down the road.
Gigacoin please!
Ok, let's see, that would be 0.43 coins.
Oh shit, I have only the cripplecoin purse on me! Please recompute the ticket!
That's allright sir, we like to please everyone, in cripplecoin that would be 7.40!
Ah, thanks, I'll pay 7.45 including tip, sorry, I've had a hard time with XT lately, and my mistress left me.
That's ok, but just to inform you, in the future we will only take gigacoin, starting next week.
Shit, I sold them all!
Maybe you should not come here any more, sir. There is an excellent McDonalds just a few blocks down the road.
August 15, 2015, 09:02:53 PM
August 15, 2015, 08:34:48 PM
Hey all. If you could jump over to my thread and vote on the below chart that would be great. All I need is your vote, but it would be great to get some feedback in the comments as well.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1145207.20
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1145207.20
August 15, 2015, 08:02:59 PM
August 15, 2015, 07:56:21 PM
Looks like Hearn's bankster-buddy handlers at Circle want to buy lower so they pushing hard for the PanoptiCoin and extended bitcoin turmoil.
PanoptiCoin. Good one!
August 15, 2015, 07:49:59 PM
Lol, "commie talk" indeed, I should mine for you for free?
Fuck you, enjoy your fork, asshole.
Then only mine transactions with fees at a level you find acceptable. That's the point, not artificial scarcity.
[And yes, the block reward is heavily distorting the market right now. However, transactions are currently being oversubsidised which is an argument not to artificially restrict transactions in a block if anything]
Come on Richy, you been around as long as anyone. What I do or don't doesn't make for a hill of beans. My hashpower amounts for as much as my vote, absolutely nothing.
My concern here is that if there is no scarcity of inclusion in the blocks, then there is no incentive to pay a fee. No fees, no incentive to mine.
It's pretty simple. If there does not exist enough monetary incentive to secure the network at a level larger than the potential reward for attacking the network, then we're toast. "Game over man, game over."
August 15, 2015, 07:48:11 PM
if public gets notice of this fork-thing we could easily go double digits.
We are just waiting for the conclusion of the debacle, then MOON!
you're an idiot if you think Hearn is taking you to the moon ... he's the lead engineer on the train to the gulags.
You damn troll, away with you!! To the List!!!
Even I dropped my jet-pack in for a service today - just in case...
August 15, 2015, 07:45:18 PM
Sold half my trading stash
We probably gonna be back at265 255 tomorrow and I'll buy back but oh well
We probably gonna be back at
FTFY
August 15, 2015, 07:42:33 PM
Looks like Hearn's bankster-buddy handlers at Circle want to buy lower so they pushing hard for the PanoptiCoin and extended bitcoin turmoil.
Welcome back! I haven't seen you in a while. So what's the big deal about 8 mb blocks? It's similar to a difficulty increase and effects everyone equally, so why should anyone mind? If mining gets harder, that just prevents potential competition from entering the market, right?
August 15, 2015, 07:41:27 PM
Sold half my trading stash
We probably gonna be back at 265 tomorrow and I'll buy back but oh well
We probably gonna be back at 265 tomorrow and I'll buy back but oh well
Jump to: