That's a fairly obvious fishing post, although, as you say, not as colourful as before. He's expecting some well-intentioned nerd to respond, only to bombard him/her with text. And as nerds we keep entertaining him. If only they could ban him.
I think the fact that you don't find them as funny anymore may be a subliminal realization that things aren't as rosy as you had been hoping to believe. After all the good news lately, for once outnumbering the scams, there is still no improvement in bitcoin. The failure of GBTC * to take off is a further kick in the nuts.
Maybe you are realizing that if bitcoin is going to succeed, it needs to do it on its own.
Anyway, my posts are generally aimed at the lurkers, the people who come here to check out what its all about. I understand you have your view and you are not about to change it for all the logic in China.
I don't find them funny because I never did. I just needed some flow in my text.
And if you knew anything about logic you would know that logic doesn't say anything about anything. It's simply a way to analyse consistency within a text or a statement. Like this sentence:
"Maybe you are realizing that if bitcoin is going to succeed, it needs to do it on its own"
which could be seen as inconsistent with this:
"Anyway, my posts are generally aimed at the lurkers, the people who come here to check out what its all about."
Ask your buddy about it, he uses it quite consistently to mislead people.
With regards to lurkers. Every single one of them understands this thread better than you do, so you can lower your shoulders.
Yup. And apples are inconsistent with oranges. Different things, like different statements are, well, different.
Neither I nor Jorge is out to mislead anyone. Just to point out the obvious flaws in some of the absurdities that pass for axioms on this thread.
Being able to make an informed decision about anything generally requires you to look at both sides. For you, there is clearly only one side, and you don't want anyone to look at it from any other angle, Hence the need to demonize, "ignore" or blacklist anyone who doesn't fully subscribe to your own narrow view of bitcoin.
As for lurkers, I was watching this thread for a long time before I started posting. In that time I could see the obvious duplicity in the postings of certain regulars, who try to paint a picture that bitcoin is on its way to being worth $32k a coin because... well just because.
As for your statement
With regards to lurkers. Every single one of them understands this thread better than you do
Maybe they do. Dont know how you think you are qualified to say how "every single one" of them thinks, though
. And if they have seen both sides of the argument in coming to their conclusions, then that is even better.