Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24727. (Read 26713246 times)

full member
Activity: 660
Merit: 101
Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
[ ... ] using BTCChina to crash. Volume reported by bitcoincharts is greater than Bitstamp, Bitfinex and BTC-E together, so it could be fake.

Since about Oct/10, BTC-China's volume has been comparable to what it was in Nov 2013 (~50--60 kBTC/day). 

During the Nov bubble, OKCoin was ~30 kBTC/day, Huobi ~20, MtGOX ~25, Bitstamp ~20, BTC-e ~20, Bitfinex ~5.

After the december decrees, BTC-China they lost nearly all their volume, while Huobi and OKCoin grew.

The November bubble cannot have been solely a MtGOX internal mega-pump.  There is a plausible explanation for it, which is the opening of the huge Chinese mainland market of amateur speculators.   That demand required huge arbitrage activity, buying hundreds of thousands of coins in the "Western" exchanges (including MtGOX) and selling them to speculators and holders in China.  Arbitragers (which were probably exchange owners) must have made tons of money that month. Willy was probably the buying end of an arbitrage pump at MtGOX, the selling end being perhaps at BTC-China. 

No way in hell. MtGox could not absorb hundreds of thousands of coins being taken off the market without going well in to the 10000's/BTC

It was fake money buying real BTC. Most logical explanation.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
[ ... ] using BTCChina to crash. Volume reported by bitcoincharts is greater than Bitstamp, Bitfinex and BTC-E together, so it could be fake.

Since about Oct/10, BTC-China's volume has been comparable to what it was in Nov 2013 (~50--60 kBTC/day). 

During the Nov bubble, OKCoin was ~30 kBTC/day, Huobi ~20, MtGOX ~25, Bitstamp ~20, BTC-e ~20, Bitfinex ~5.

After the december decrees, BTC-China they lost nearly all their volume, while Huobi and OKCoin grew.

The November bubble cannot have been solely a MtGOX internal mega-pump.  There is a plausible explanation for it, which is the opening of the huge Chinese mainland market of amateur speculators.   That demand required huge arbitrage activity, buying hundreds of thousands of coins in the "Western" exchanges (including MtGOX) and selling them to speculators and holders in China.  Arbitragers (which were probably exchange owners) must have made tons of money that month. Willy was probably the buying end of an arbitrage pump at MtGOX, the selling end being perhaps at BTC-China. 
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
Winklevosses should spend less time on embarassing themselves at conferences and more time on reinstating Willy, this time preferably at multiple exchanges.
o_o
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
Seems that price is managed by a little little quantity of volume. However, see the show of the brother winklevoss yesterday evening about the ETF  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
I just wrote an e-mail to all of the three big chinese exchanges in which i informed them that i have reported them to the PBOC due to the reason that they are stealing money from the hard working chinese people with price and volume manipulation. I will post their reply in here if i should get one.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Triple top or breakout? We shall know soon enough.

bullish !

legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Triple top or breakout? We shall know soon enough.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
https://www.bitstamp.net/article/final-notice-to-unverified-account-holders/
Quote
Any remaining balances will be subject to immediate seizure by and forfeiture to regulatory authorities.

You could view it as a donation to the UK government, perhaps in particular the GCHQ? Cheesy

Thanks for the link... Gosh this is some fucking travesty LOL



Dear Bitstamp customer:
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
7 days until Bitstamp seizes all BTC belonging to unverified accounts.

Criminals don't have much time left to get fake IDs, spend all their filthy fiat money buying and withdraw BTC.

Wait, are they doing this for real? Bitstamp has already slipped to the point of irrelevance, and now this? They are fucked!
https://www.bitstamp.net/article/final-notice-to-unverified-account-holders/
Quote
Any remaining balances will be subject to immediate seizure by and forfeiture to regulatory authorities.

You could view it as a donation to the UK government, perhaps in particular the GCHQ? Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
The price has stagnated for a while now 300-340 USD.

It'd be nice to even have a jump of 50 dollars or something.

Yawn.

teh market is moving again  yesss
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
playing pasta and eating mandolinos
7 days until Bitstamp seizes all BTC belonging to unverified accounts.

Criminals don't have much time left to get fake IDs, spend all their filthy fiat money buying and withdraw BTC.

Wait, are they doing this for real? Bitstamp has already slipped to the point of irrelevance, and now this? They are fucked!
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
can we now call this bear trap Huh
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
The price has stagnated for a while now 300-340 USD.

It'd be nice to even have a jump of 50 dollars or something.

Yawn.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
With 0% fees, you can self-trade (market fill your limit order before others do) and the cost will be 0. If you want to trade with others, the cost will be only the (naturally low) spread. That's why I call it fake.

So you're changing your tune now Blitz?  I distinctly remember posts from you months ago, where you defended Chinese exchanges saying their volume was completely legit.

He's always a bit slow.
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
7 days until Bitstamp seizes all BTC belonging to unverified accounts.

Criminals don't have much time left to get fake IDs, spend all their filthy fiat money buying and withdraw BTC.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Moderator
Maybe this was a actually a good happening today and the western ones will decouple a bit more(get independent) from China as todays actions were too obvious faked to take them 100% seriously and consider them without a doubt as market leader all the time, just like all the other exchanges did with Gox after a while.
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
With 0% fees, you can self-trade (market fill your limit order before others do) and the cost will be 0. If you want to trade with others, the cost will be only the (naturally low) spread. That's why I call it fake.

So you're changing your tune now Blitz?  I distinctly remember posts from you months ago, where you defended Chinese exchanges saying their volume was completely legit.
Did I? I have always viewed the volume as inflated, and I remember having said so long ago. I think they are legit in the sense that there are real people trading there. There may be some completely fraudulent volume, but the same can be said of any other exchange.

By the way, I do remember that the Chinese exchanges were supposed to abolish margin, 0% fee etc. in a plan to appease the Chinese regulators. WTF happened to that?
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
With 0% fees, you can self-trade (market fill your limit order before others do) and the cost will be 0. If you want to trade with others, the cost will be only the (naturally low) spread. That's why I call it fake.

So you're changing your tune now Blitz?  I distinctly remember posts from you months ago, where you defended Chinese exchanges saying their volume was completely legit.
Jump to: