Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26708. (Read 26609927 times)

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
Old man Lawski has the Scooby Gang scared at the moment. Soon they'll discover he's just a Superintendent of a run down old school of thought. His scary monster act only works on the kids playing in the Status Quo club. The new investors are free to move their money anywhere that makes them happy and offers more freedom.

Nice.  Can you do league of justice? "Wonder twins powers...activate!"
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
As far as I am concerned it doesn't matter whether the case for freedom and justice is made by pope or antipope, what matters is that it is made and pressed and pursued with unflagging vigour.  As long as Vorhees is making that case, he is representing me. I should prefer that Lawsky would be making it, but that's not to be, it seems.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
Where did you get this reading? It's 35 on bitcoincharts.com.

Didn't even know btcwisdom shows bbw. Or you're simply doing [upper bb] - [lower bb]? If so, I suggest to use tradingview, which (to my knowledge) normalizes width to current price, making it comparable across price levels. Otherwise the statement "the lowest in year" would be even more impressive, but also kind of meaningless since with price increase absolute width also increases.
This is actually something I've been looking for, which is why I asked. I always had to factor in the prices when looking at bitcoincharts' (bitcoincharts.com, not bitcoinwisdom.com) BBW. Yes, bitcoincharts simply subtracts lower from upper BB.

Thanks for telling me, this is extremely useful.

more useful than coindesk's latest article?  Shocked Grin
http://www.coindesk.com/trend-spotting-identify-trends-bitcoin-price-charts/

I (also) like a good old fork (and their trigger lines) personally for trends and reversals/support,resistance

*Andrews pitchforks/schiff/mod schiff
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
Where did you get this reading? It's 35 on bitcoincharts.com.

Didn't even know btcwisdom shows bbw. Or you're simply doing [upper bb] - [lower bb]? If so, I suggest to use tradingview, which (to my knowledge) normalizes width to current price, making it comparable across price levels. Otherwise the statement "the lowest in year" would be even more impressive, but also kind of meaningless since with price increase absolute width also increases.
This is actually something I've been looking for, which is why I asked. I always had to factor in the prices when looking at bitcoincharts' (bitcoincharts.com, not bitcoinwisdom.com) BBW. Yes, bitcoincharts simply subtracts lower from upper BB.

Thanks for telling me, this is extremely useful.

more useful than coindesk's latest article?  Shocked Grin
http://www.coindesk.com/trend-spotting-identify-trends-bitcoin-price-charts/
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
Where did you get this reading? It's 35 on bitcoincharts.com.

Didn't even know btcwisdom shows bbw. Or you're simply doing [upper bb] - [lower bb]? If so, I suggest to use tradingview, which (to my knowledge) normalizes width to current price, making it comparable across price levels. Otherwise the statement "the lowest in year" would be even more impressive, but also kind of meaningless since with price increase absolute width also increases.
This is actually something I've been looking for, which is why I asked. I always had to factor in the prices when looking at bitcoincharts' (bitcoincharts.com, not bitcoinwisdom.com) BBW. Yes, bitcoincharts simply subtracts lower from upper BB.

Thanks for telling me, this is extremely useful.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
When's this magical day? 24th of July? I think nothing interesting is going to happen until Sept to be honest.

Yawn.

I don't really know and actually highly doubt that there's a universally accepted magical date set in stone. A lot of people actually believe a decision could be made 'any day now' for a couple of weeks. So where are everybody's charts with long term trend lines and support thresholds? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
FUD of the day!!!

Bitcoin fell by $6!!! Quick! Save yourselves! Sell all your coins!!!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Man that was close! I got out in time right???
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
When's this magical day? 24th of July? I think nothing interesting is going to happen until Sept to be honest.

Yawn.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
Where did you get this reading? It's 35 on bitcoincharts.com.

Didn't even know btcwisdom shows bbw. Or you're simply doing [upper bb] - [lower bb]? If so, I suggest to use tradingview, which (to my knowledge) normalizes width to current price, making it comparable across price levels. Otherwise the statement "the lowest in year" would be even more impressive, but also kind of meaningless since with price increase absolute width also increases.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
Hey, we have a 2 hr high. Not ATH, but it is something.


We're on our way up the $5-10 corridor now, only to bounce back after we reach $629 I guess. Although it is Sunday night so we might see some surprise rallye. Prepare for another week of uncertainty in Bitcoinland :/

Yeah we could have a repeat (due to new users) of the weekend-dip-no-shit-not-this-weekend-better-buy-back-in.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
Hey, we have a 2 hr high. Not ATH, but it is something.


We're on our way up the $5-10 corridor now, only to bounce back after we reach $629 I guess. Although it is Sunday night so we might see some surprise rallye. Prepare for another week of uncertainty in Bitcoinland :/
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
Hey, we have a 2 hr high. Not ATH, but it is something.
legendary
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
FUD of the day!!!

Bitcoin fell by $6!!! Quick! Save yourselves! Sell all your coins!!!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
Where did you get this reading? It's 35 on bitcoincharts.com.
hero member
Activity: 870
Merit: 585
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.

at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment  I think they are good because they bring clarity and a framework-publicity and I think will bring new investors into the ecosystem. It is like a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one)  One way or another  I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity"  either.  There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face.

Boot on your face...  don't fight it.
Just bend over and lube up.

Not.
Jump to: