Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26710. (Read 26609924 times)

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
That's what Big Trade is buying into - the utility, not the speculative opportunity, so I'm not expecting another "launch".  I'll be very surprised if we see $1000 again - there's no good reason for it at the transactional level.
That belief is certainly the goal which the present psyop against Bitcoin is attempting to achieve.

Don't understand - why would a view that emphasizes Bitcoins utility be a hostile operation?

It's drawing attention to Bitcoin the currency, when Bitcoins killer app is Bitcoin the store of wealth.

Or as I have come to understand it Bitcoin is a universal debt ledger (unit of account), primed to accept the current financial debt systems, where debt is a vacuum that attracts wealth. (I.e. money as memory and that memory is going to be global and collectively stored on an P2P blockchain )
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441

Just hold your paper wallet in a clenched fist while you're talking to him or you might find out when you get home that it's gone.  Shocked  lol

Nahhh...  

I keep that paper wallet in my next door neighbours horse, sorry I mean my magical unicorn.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.

at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment  I think they are good becuse they bring clarity and a framework- a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one)  One way or another  I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity"  either.  There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face.

Voorhees is just a slick well educated criminal. His only concern is his free ability to sucker people into incredible wealth for himself. Let's face it, his past business ventures haven't been humanitarian concerns. He created a gambling site that bombed the blockchain at a time when it wasn't prepared for it. He sold illegal securities and only paid anyone back after his legal counsel told him he could go to jail. He stole 2600 Bitcoins from people with FeedZBirds and never returned any of it. He couldn't care less about any freedom other than the freedom to steal. The Winklevoss at least want Bitcoin to "fit into society" for now. That leads to wide spread adoption and more profit for all of us.

Next time I talk to Erik I will pass that on  Cheesy Cheesy  I am not sure he would agree with you.

Lemme see...



he said...



Just hold your paper wallet in a clenched fist while you're talking to him or you might find out when you get home that it's gone.  Shocked  lol
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.

at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment  I think they are good becuse they bring clarity and a framework- a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one)  One way or another  I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity"  either.  There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face.

Voorhees is just a slick well educated criminal. His only concern is his free ability to sucker people into incredible wealth for himself. Let's face it, his past business ventures haven't been humanitarian concerns. He created a gambling site that bombed the blockchain at a time when it wasn't prepared for it. He sold illegal securities and only paid anyone back after his legal counsel told him he could go to jail. He stole 2600 Bitcoins from people with FeedZBirds and never returned any of it. He couldn't care less about any freedom other than the freedom to steal. The Winklevoss at least want Bitcoin to "fit into society" for now. That leads to wide spread adoption and more profit for all of us.

Next time I talk to Erik I will pass that on  Cheesy Cheesy  I am not sure he would agree with you.

Lemme see...



he said...

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
a dumptard and his coins will soon be parted.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
i think monkey would conquer, we are at an intraday bottom - 621
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.

at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment  I think they are good becuse they bring clarity and a framework- a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one)  One way or another  I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity"  either.  There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face.

Voorhees is just a slick well educated criminal. His only concern is his free ability to sucker people into incredible wealth for himself. Let's face it, his past business ventures haven't been humanitarian concerns. He created a gambling site that bombed the blockchain at a time when it wasn't prepared for it. He sold illegal securities and only paid anyone back after his legal counsel told him he could go to jail. He stole 2600 Bitcoins from people with FeedZBirds and never returned any of it. He couldn't care less about any freedom other than the freedom to steal. The Winklevoss at least want Bitcoin to "fit into society" for now. That leads to wide spread adoption and more profit for all of us.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.

at this stage in the game... I think the regs are a good thing for the next stage of the BTC life cycle...... later down the line.... things will change I am sure as BTC becomes ubiquitous. I think there is a middle ground point of view on the regs themselves... between the views of the winklevosses and Erik.... my feelings towards the future of cryptos is more aligned with Erik as far as I know , however I differ on how negative I think these regs are at the moment  I think they are good because they bring clarity and a framework-publicity and I think will bring new investors into the ecosystem. It is like a foothold if you like for BTC to continue its path- not that it needs it... but fact is... they are coming, they are going to be put into place, and as such- they are not "bad" or should I say "not too bad" It is a far cry from "BTC is bannned" or regulated out of use (good luck with that one)  One way or another  I do not see these regs being the end of "Cryptos for humanity"  either.  There are too many people around the world fed up of the boot on their face.
hero member
Activity: 870
Merit: 585
The regulations are bad news? I have to disgree....

Well, Erik Vorhees did not like them: http://moneyandstate.com/reflections-right-privacy-response-nydfs-bitcoin-proposal/



And the winklevosses adore them.  Vorhees cares about human freedom and dignity, while the winklevosses care about the value of their bitcoin.  Thus vorhees is disappointed while the winklevosses are encouraged.
Wii are afraid to rub tptb the wrong way; if the adorable twins make astringent pronouncements à la Voorhees, teacher won't give them the gold star.
Suckups.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Cost / Value analysis says we should be trading our bitcoins for at least 1500$. cheap coins everywhere!
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
lol is that a joke?

UP!

 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

Agreed. Lowest daily BBW since ages - below 0.06, last time that happened was September 2013 iirc. It'll resolve soon, I'm sure. Not equally sure though in which direction. :/
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
We've been at this price the last few weeks, something has to give soon!

yup......
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
Old man Lawski has the Scooby Gang scared at the moment. Soon they'll discover he's just a Superintendent of a run down old school of thought. His scary monster act only works on the kids playing in the Status Quo club. The new investors are free to move their money anywhere that makes them happy and offers more freedom.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
Jump to: