In my thinking your comments are misleading b/c you are projecting the future, as if BTC prices are going to be on a continuous downward projection from December 2013 and thereafter.
Please point out the comma in those posts that you think can be interpreted as a hint of an insinuation of some innuendo about the future...
I stated several times, and repeat again: I do not see how one could make any fundamented prediction about the price of bitcoin, even in the short term. I would not hazard making any. It may go to 6'000$ next week, or it may go down to 6$.
All one can say is that,
if this or that event were to happen,
then the price could go signifcantly up or down. But none of the events that we can think of is sufficiently certain to happen, and other events may happen that would have the opposite effect.
Jorge:
I appreciate your response here; nonetheless, I am NOT going to go back through your posts to point out the various flaws and/or assumptions contained therein. Through several months that I have been participating in this thread, I have noticed that a lot of people call you out b/c of the general tendency that you have to be misleading in your posts. And, for example in your earlier post, you described the recent rise from $350 to $650 as if it were a bubble, and such a characterization seems to assume that BTC prices are going down, rather than up.
In this most recent post (above), you seem to be attempting to be more objective and reasonable in your assertion that prices could go either way (up or down); however, in many instances, your posts do NOT tend to be of this same character b/c they tend to contain a considerable amount of spin and a considerable amount of embedded assumptions that strive to lead the reader(s) towards your predetermined conclusion(s) that bitcoin is bound for failure.
