Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28844. (Read 26630455 times)
March 17, 2014, 05:36:03 PM
What the hell happened to this dip/crash/panic/slide that everyone was predicting? I got fresh fiat waiting to pickup some cheap coins. Thinking about accumulating a long position in green beer.
March 17, 2014, 05:26:16 PM
Litecoin about to cross 0.0283 BTC per LTC at BTC-e?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
there X4 more litecoin then bitcoin
it offers 0 innovation
its expecting a strong dead cat bounce because thats just how ridiculous crypto VS fiat is
that is all.
http://www.crosscoinventures.com/
I thought this was going to be BTC comics page. Disappointed.
March 17, 2014, 05:13:11 PM
Litecoin about to cross 0.0283 BTC per LTC at BTC-e?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
there X4 more litecoin then bitcoin
it offers 0 innovation
its expecting a strong dead cat bounce because thats just how ridiculous crypto VS fiat is
that is all.
http://www.crosscoinventures.com/
March 17, 2014, 05:02:13 PM
March 17, 2014, 05:01:24 PM
Litecoin about to cross 0.0283 BTC per LTC at BTC-e?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
there X4 more litecoin then bitcoin
it offers 0 innovation
its expecting a strong dead cat bounce because thats just how ridiculous crypto VS fiat is
that is all.
March 17, 2014, 04:53:44 PM
Quote
We will be adding significant liquidity to the global Bitcoin market through developing our subsidiaries to utilize the benefits of this technology, thus naturally increasing demand of which we project to have a positive influence on the exchange rate.
From the new Neo & Bee (LMB Holdings) prospectus: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1khGADbJeu0efCNZ13lnz8BucG7PfS5Cl9lBZ1sncY-4/editAll the appendices with financial projections will be released later this week (https://twitter.com/BtcDanny/status/445667845436096512)
March 17, 2014, 04:52:45 PM
Litecoin about to cross 0.0283 BTC per LTC at BTC-e?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
Litecoin to meet Bitcoin at 135 USD?
March 17, 2014, 04:02:13 PM
March 17, 2014, 03:47:49 PM
This price is getting me bored and angry 
We need a revolution! how long people can hodl?...
Can't hodl forever
"Can't rain all the time" Eric Draven
We need a revolution!
how long people can hodl?... Can't hodl forever
"Can't rain all the time" Eric Draven
yep...without revolution and electric chairs for the people doing God´s work, craptofuck is pointless and only a new venue for them to rip the asses of our children even wider
March 17, 2014, 03:45:28 PM
Russia recognized Crimea and EU introduced sanctions to 21 person from Russia and Krim including Putin himself. No travel to EU and asset freeze.
omg such BS
March 17, 2014, 03:40:35 PM
Russia recognized Crimea and EU introduced sanctions to 21 person from Russia and Krim including Putin himself. No travel to EU and asset freeze.
March 17, 2014, 03:40:15 PM
This price is getting me bored and angry
We need a revolution! how long people can hodl?...
Can't hodl forever
"Can't rain all the time" Eric Draven
We need a revolution!
how long people can hodl?... Can't hodl forever
"Can't rain all the time" Eric Draven
March 17, 2014, 03:18:04 PM
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
What an air of confidence!!!!
March 17, 2014, 03:17:09 PM
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
i think those options weed out the not so serious voters
trolls can't help but hit the troll options, which give more meaningful results to the yes,no,idk option.
its a troll trap and it works, when i'm not sure, and i feel like trolling the poll i hit buy buy buy.
Aside from your reasoning, it is your fucking poll. Do what you want. So many nannies want to control other people in this world. If solarflare wants a poll with his 3 serious options, solarflare can go make his own fucking poll elsewhere.
It is too bad that poll results were NOT posted into the thread.... maybe we could get chart buddy to work on it, since s/he does NOT seem to be too busy these days, with such stable BTC prices...
March 17, 2014, 03:12:45 PM
OK.... I will, in part, take back what I said...
I meant to suggest big ticket items and the ability to remain somewhat untargeted.
Through a site, such as bitpremier, it does seem possible to liquidate some coins through a site... and it does seem possible to stay somewhat anonymous... However, if bitpremier is engaging in know your customer practices (and I base that on its various affiliates), then it may NOT be easy to relieve oneself of ill-acquired bitcoins...
From what I can see, I would NOT feel very confident going through bitpremier... unless they just put you in contact with each other... and say, go at it on the side.... harder for any service to make money, if they let parties engage in their own interaction(s).... Craigslist seems to do o.k. by letting parties engage in their own interactions...
March 17, 2014, 03:02:12 PM
March 17, 2014, 02:55:41 PM
March 17, 2014, 02:14:58 PM
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
i think those options weed out the not so serious voters
trolls can't help but hit the troll options, which give more meaningful results to the yes,no,idk option.
its a troll trap and it works, when i'm not sure, and i feel like trolling the poll i hit buy buy buy.
I think your logic here is very sound Adam. I suspect Dan Ariely would approve.
March 17, 2014, 02:07:58 PM
looks neat
March 17, 2014, 01:48:53 PM
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
Sooo..if you are "most likely wrong on this though" why dont you just state the opposite and tell us that you are "most likely right on that though"
The correct term was probably "take this with a grain of salt, but..."
Being "most likely wrong", doesn't mean that the exact opposite will happen, I expect a swing upwards, but it just might not be all the way to 656 like my prediction.
so far so good.
Jump to: