Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 32315. (Read 26469335 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007

Sorry, but no.

Anarcho-syndicalism = workers control the means of production. You work in a factory - you control directly the production process, you participate directly in the decision making and you OWN the fruit of your labour.

Communism = social ownership of means of production. It might seem similar, but its not at all - as a worker you do not "own" the means of production nor the fruits of your labour in a communist system, the "society" does, which basically means that the State owns them. That's why Bakunin said communism was going to be "the biggest lie of the Century", and it even said communism was just a form of "state capitalism", as the worker did not control the means of production nor the fruit of his labour. An exception would be Pannekoek's council communism, which was totally opposed to russian bolshevism, and was in many ways much closer to Kropotkin's and Bakunnin's anarcho-communism.

And again: Bitcoin is just a currency, and it has no political sign - but saying is "anarcho-syndicalist" is simply wrong. Most of original anarchists (or "left" anarchists, as some would say, especially in the US) wouldn't even use money as we know it (an exception would be Proudhon's mutualism), in fact during the most relevant anarcho-syndicalist experience in history (Aragón, Spain: 1930-1938) the "Peseta" of the Spanish Republica was not used at all. They had no currency nor legal tender, they just seldomly issued their own "money" which were just vouchers or IOU's with very specific uses. And BTW: anarcho-syndicalism is just a WAY or STRATEGY to reach "anarchy", or "anarcho-communism" or "libertarian communism", as many US folks like to name them to distinguish them from their very own, ill-named "anarcho-capitalism")

Fascinating experience BTW (the one in Aragón), it was a pity that both the spanish fascists and the KPSS (Russian communists) joined forced to crush what could have been one of the most relevant and game-changing revolutions in Europe's history.

Sorry of the OT, folks.







quite exactly, and fuck OT, everyone must have watched this at least once:


Living Utopia (The Anarchists & The Spanish Revolution)
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
When I called back Mike was very nice. He stated that I have sold a lot of Bitcoin on eBay and wanted to know my experience with it and was it positive.

(...)

He mentioned that they were considering policy changes to allow it to be sold but he stated that "we can't ask our user to register with Fincen" I agreed its too costly.

Michael Carson's duties at Ebay (taken from his Linkedin profile):

Quote
- Responsible for developing and implementing policies to effectively manage regulatory, industry and brand risks.
- Interface with third parties, including government officials, law enforcement, trade groups and individual companies.

Sweet Cheesy

This is not about Bitcoin integration, but defining a clear policy about selling and buying Bitcoin on eBay, I think.

I assume eBay is kinda liable for what is listed there. Just some brainstorming.. people sell Bitcoin on eBay -> eBay is a plattform to purchase Bitcoin -> eBay might be considered as MSB or whatever. << I'm sure it's not like this at all, but ... I hope you get the point. Wink

Anyway, this is still great news. People working at eBay are infected with the Bitcoin idea. Today it's about policies, tomorrow might be about integration.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Nah. Bitcoin is too Communist for eBay.

Tell that to the libertarians here Wink
It seems very capitalistic to me.  As with any other currency, there's a small number of people with huge stashes ruining things for everyone else, such as by dirty tricks like dumping about 25000BTC onto a rising market last night, and manipulating the price with huge ask/bid walls.

Its not communist or capitalist - its just a currency. It is for sure a demon for Keynesianists, which usually label themselves as "left wing economists", as the ability to inflate the currency is a must for the Keynesianist "stimulus strategy" in crisis times, which is a central point of Keynesianism.

That said, a communist government would never accept a national currency they cannot fully control - on the contrary, libertarian capitalists or more generially austrian echonomy followers would embrace it with joy.

Anyhow, I can see anarchists/communists/anti-capitalists supporting Bitcoin just because is a "bank killer", and right now the financial elites are the ones ruling the world, so we could say that Bitcoin could turn upside down the current status quo, which might be a desiderable intermediate step for communists/anarchists/anti-capitalists in general. Bitcoin would never been the end goal for anti-capitalists, but it could be a first step to radically change the power balances in the world.

Who owns Bitcoin?

It is Anarcho Syndicalist.

Communism simply means that workers control the means of production, instead of a State (Nationalism), or rentiers (Capitalism).

Communism isn't a dirty word. Get over it.

And Keynsian economics just means that you have a bigger toolbox, it does not preclude other economic systems.

Sorry, but no.

Anarcho-syndicalism = workers control the means of production. You work in a factory - you control directly the production process, you participate directly in the decision making and you OWN the fruit of your labour.

Communism = social ownership of means of production. It might seem similar, but its not at all - as a worker you do not "own" the means of production nor the fruits of your labour in a communist system, the "society" does, which basically means that the State owns them. That's why Bakunin said communism was going to be "the biggest lie of the Century", and it even said communism was just a form of "state capitalism", as the worker did not control the means of production nor the fruit of his labour. An exception would be Pannekoek's council communism, which was totally opposed to russian bolshevism, and was in many ways much closer to Kropotkin's anarcho-communism.

And again: Bitcoin is just a currency, and it has no political sign - but saying is "anarcho-syndicalist" is simply wrong. Most of original anarchists (or "left" anarchists, as some would say, especially in the US) wouldn't even use money as we know it (an exception would be Proudhon's mutualism), in fact during the most relevant anarcho-syndicalist experience in history (Aragón, Spain: 1930-1938) the "Peseta" of the Spanish Republica was not used at all. They had no currency nor legal tender, they just seldomly issued their own "money" which were just vouchers or IOU's with very specific uses.

Fascinating experience BTW, it was a pity that both the spanish fascists and the KPSS (Russian communists) joined forced to crush what could have been one of the most relevant and game-changing revolutions in Europe's history.

Sorry of the OT, folks.






You can find those definitions variously applied by your choice of authority. It does not detract from my point, which is that eBay has no intention of empowering any sort of democratic, actually PtoP, technology without the ability to insert their very heavy hand. Their recent activity with Mailpile is just one indication of this.

My choice of authorities regarding anarchism and communism are Marx, Engels, Pannaekok, Trotsky, Lenin, Gramsci, Bakunin, Proudhon, Kropotkin, Rudolf Rocker, Diego Abad de Santillana and a long etcetera, and they all agree on the definitions. Oh, and they also agree on being anti-capitalists... And finally, they also agree that for a total liberation money needs to cease to exist. For bolshevics, that would happen in the "final" stage of the revolution (anarchy or libertarian communism). For anarchists, from the very first moment. That's why stating that a currency (BTC) is "communist" or "anarcho-syndicalist" (which BTW is just a strategy to reach anarcho-collectivism) is quite strange.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Anyway, i've haven't been so much bullish since April.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Going back to the "mike from ebay" thing: nightowlace story didn't seem a lie to me, I was just amazed that he did not ask more info (last name and position) to the guy making the questions - now I see he did.

Nevertheless, I still cannot understand how Paypal/Ebay could be seriously thinking about integrating Bitcoin - it's totally against their interests. Come on: irreversible transfers, decentralized currency, pseudoanonymity? It's a Paypal antagonist, I really cannot see how they could support BTC, it is completely opposite to their philosophy - in fact, aren't Paypal and Ebay jerking around with people dealing with BTC?

As I said when I saw the CEO of Paypal speaking about BTC: I'm very sure those guys are looking closely to BTC, but IMO they would develop their own proprietary crypto, they wouldn't embrace BTC as it is.

Paypal do deal with multiple currencies so it's not totally out of line. There are a few shortcomings of Bitcoin (Not major or insurmountable in my opinion) that a Paypal-like service could smooth over. Most notably, as a (for the most part) trusted financial part of the purchase chain, Paypal could enter the role of an escrow service, possibly with pre-funded accounts.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Nah. Bitcoin is too Communist for eBay.

Tell that to the libertarians here Wink
It seems very capitalistic to me.  As with any other currency, there's a small number of people with huge stashes ruining things for everyone else, such as by dirty tricks like dumping about 25000BTC onto a rising market last night, and manipulating the price with huge ask/bid walls.

Its not communist or capitalist - its just a currency. It is for sure a demon for Keynesianists, which usually label themselves as "left wing economists", as the ability to inflate the currency is a must for the Keynesianist "stimulus strategy" in crisis times, which is a central point of Keynesianism.

That said, a communist government would never accept a national currency they cannot fully control - on the contrary, libertarian capitalists or more generially austrian echonomy followers would embrace it with joy.

Anyhow, I can see anarchists/communists/anti-capitalists supporting Bitcoin just because is a "bank killer", and right now the financial elites are the ones ruling the world, so we could say that Bitcoin could turn upside down the current status quo, which might be a desiderable intermediate step for communists/anarchists/anti-capitalists in general. Bitcoin would never been the end goal for anti-capitalists, but it could be a first step to radically change the power balances in the world.

Who owns Bitcoin?

It is Anarcho Syndicalist.

Communism simply means that workers control the means of production, instead of a State (Nationalism), or rentiers (Capitalism).

Communism isn't a dirty word. Get over it.

And Keynsian economics just means that you have a bigger toolbox, it does not preclude other economic systems.

Sorry, but no.

Anarcho-syndicalism = workers control the means of production. You work in a factory - you control directly the production process, you participate directly in the decision making and you OWN the fruit of your labour.

Communism = social ownership of means of production. It might seem similar, but its not at all - as a worker you do not "own" the means of production nor the fruits of your labour in a communist system, the "society" does, which basically means that the State owns them. That's why Bakunin said communism was going to be "the biggest lie of the Century", and it even said communism was just a form of "state capitalism", as the worker did not control the means of production nor the fruit of his labour. An exception would be Pannekoek's council communism, which was totally opposed to russian bolshevism, and was in many ways much closer to Kropotkin's and Bakunnin's anarcho-communism.

And again: Bitcoin is just a currency, and it has no political sign - but saying is "anarcho-syndicalist" is simply wrong. Most of original anarchists (or "left" anarchists, as some would say, especially in the US) wouldn't even use money as we know it (an exception would be Proudhon's mutualism), in fact during the most relevant anarcho-syndicalist experience in history (Aragón, Spain: 1930-1938) the "Peseta" of the Spanish Republica was not used at all. They had no currency nor legal tender, they just seldomly issued their own "money" which were just vouchers or IOU's with very specific uses. And BTW: anarcho-syndicalism is just a WAY or STRATEGY to reach "anarchy", or "anarcho-communism" or "libertarian communism", as many US folks like to name them to distinguish them from their very own, ill-named "anarcho-capitalism")

Fascinating experience BTW (the one in Aragón), it was a pity that both the spanish fascists and the KPSS (Russian communists) joined forced to crush what could have been one of the most relevant and game-changing revolutions in Europe's history.

Sorry of the OT, folks.




newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
maybe someone got desperate after the 10 dollar dip? i don't know. i can only speculate.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
I think it's fake, unfortunately.

This link shows the same page:

http://edccdn.com/bitcoin/
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
I find it weird that the blog entry is missing comment section below the post.

different facebook "share" button.
no date.
the images are not hosted on their site.

I did not find this blog entry(still looking for it) after checking some of their older "deals blog" posts.


Also, I can still remember the fake blog @ CNN Politics Blog about an order by a judge to seize the assets of   BTC-e.




Yep. That's my skepticism as well. Note that the youtube video is posted by some random name, and also no comments. I dunno, we will get there guys- just we don't need to fake it.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Listen, last thing I'm going to say regarding the validity of the phone call. For those who doubt me I am more than willing to have the phone call verified by any trustworthy hero member.

To be honest I was so taken back by the call I didn't even get to ask the questions like, how likely is this, how close are you, etc.


Call him again! =)

Haha. I want to really really bad! I think I might. I'm just going to say I was so taken back by the call I didn't get to ask the important questions. I want a hero member conferenced in and recording to verify!

That is an marvelous idea, do it!

I'm willing, who will get on the phone with me and record & verify?


And what questions would we like to see asked?
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Listen, last thing I'm going to say regarding the validity of the phone call. For those who doubt me I am more than willing to have the phone call verified by any trustworthy hero member.

To be honest I was so taken back by the call I didn't even get to ask the questions like, how likely is this, how close are you, etc.


Call him again! =)

Haha. I want to really really bad! I think I might. I'm just going to say I was so taken back by the call I didn't get to ask the important questions. I want a hero member conferenced in and recording to verify!

That is an marvelous idea, do it!

I'm willing, who will get on the phone with me and record & verify?
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Listen, last thing I'm going to say regarding the validity of the phone call. For those who doubt me I am more than willing to have the phone call verified by any trustworthy hero member.

To be honest I was so taken back by the call I didn't even get to ask the questions like, how likely is this, how close are you, etc.


Call him again! =)

Haha. I want to really really bad! I think I might. I'm just going to say I was so taken back by the call I didn't get to ask the important questions. I want a hero member conferenced in and recording to verify!

That is an marvelous idea, do it!
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I find it weird that the blog entry is missing comment section below the post.

different facebook "share" button.
no date.
the images are not hosted on their site.

I did not find this blog entry(still looking for it) after checking some of their older "deals blog" posts.


Also, I can still remember the fake blog @ CNN Politics Blog about an order by a judge to seize the assets of   BTC-e.


legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
I'm registered as a business with eBay (I think) and I sold about $30,000 USD worth of Casascius Coins on eBay. When the original voicemail was left for me I think he was looking to gain information on whether or not I would return to selling BTC on eBay if their policies were adjusted to allow it, (hence the incorporating it into ebay as an allowable item to sell). Then when we got on the phone we began discussing how PayPal can eliminate or reduce the liability to the seller regarding Fincen guidelines.

I'm pretty impressed by that little bitcoin video. That is very positive news in my opinion. Maybe paypal won't be our great enemy after all.

Don't kid yourself. They just froze funds for Mailpile. They won't do anything until they have figured out how to corral Bitcoin into black-hole eBay branded wallets.

I'm sure they figured that out before they made this video.

http://deals.ebay.com/blog/whats-the-deal-with-bitcoins-anyway/

It's the only thing to figure out, otherwise integration is really easy. Basically, you won't be able to fund eBay brand Bitcoins unless you can prove their pedigree, and you won't be able to send them anywhere that has not been pre-approved.

Any attempt to brand bitcoins would be met with nothing less than hilarious ridicule. They aren't stupid and they know this. They should be (and apparently are) trying to gauge public perception of the possibility of coins being integrated into both ebay and paypal.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
I'm registered as a business with eBay (I think) and I sold about $30,000 USD worth of Casascius Coins on eBay. When the original voicemail was left for me I think he was looking to gain information on whether or not I would return to selling BTC on eBay if their policies were adjusted to allow it, (hence the incorporating it into ebay as an allowable item to sell). Then when we got on the phone we began discussing how PayPal can eliminate or reduce the liability to the seller regarding Fincen guidelines.

I'm pretty impressed by that little bitcoin video. That is very positive news in my opinion. Maybe paypal won't be our great enemy after all.

Don't kid yourself. They just froze funds for Mailpile. They won't do anything until they have figured out how to corral Bitcoin into black-hole eBay branded wallets.

I'm sure they figured that out before they made this video.

http://deals.ebay.com/blog/whats-the-deal-with-bitcoins-anyway/

It's the only thing to figure out, otherwise integration is really easy. Basically, you won't be able to fund eBay brand Bitcoins unless you can prove their pedigree, and you won't be able to send them anywhere that has not been pre-approved.

no integration is not easy.

unlike most fly by night btc websites, paypal could lose their msb licenses so they would need to understand how the sale, exchange, storage and transmission of btc impacts their current compliance operations.
legendary
Activity: 4116
Merit: 4738
You're never too old to think young.
I've long wondered if Paypal were considering Bitcoin, not as a medium for eBay transactions, etc., but as a means to facilitate, speed up, and reduce the cost of large internal international transfers, and also as a way to make it easier for customers to add money to their accounts.

I don't use credit cards (don't believe in them) so adding funds to my Paypal account takes a week. I try to keep about $2000 in my account in case I need to buy something in a hurry on eBay or miss out.

If Paypal accepted  bitcoins, you could see an item on eBay, transfer sufficient funds to Paypal in minutes with Bitcoin, and immediately place a bid or execute a buy-it-now. Since your deposit is irreversible, Paypal would have no reason to make you wait a week.

If a Bitcoin deposit option were available I probably would have already used it a dozen times in the past year alone.

Just my 2 satoshis.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
I'm registered as a business with eBay (I think) and I sold about $30,000 USD worth of Casascius Coins on eBay. When the original voicemail was left for me I think he was looking to gain information on whether or not I would return to selling BTC on eBay if their policies were adjusted to allow it, (hence the incorporating it into ebay as an allowable item to sell). Then when we got on the phone we began discussing how PayPal can eliminate or reduce the liability to the seller regarding Fincen guidelines.

I'm pretty impressed by that little bitcoin video. That is very positive news in my opinion. Maybe paypal won't be our great enemy after all.

Don't kid yourself. They just froze funds for Mailpile. They won't do anything until they have figured out how to corral Bitcoin into black-hole eBay branded wallets.

I'm sure they figured that out before they made this video.

http://deals.ebay.com/blog/whats-the-deal-with-bitcoins-anyway/

where is the buy now button Huh
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Enabling the maximal migration
I'm registered as a business with eBay (I think) and I sold about $30,000 USD worth of Casascius Coins on eBay. When the original voicemail was left for me I think he was looking to gain information on whether or not I would return to selling BTC on eBay if their policies were adjusted to allow it, (hence the incorporating it into ebay as an allowable item to sell). Then when we got on the phone we began discussing how PayPal can eliminate or reduce the liability to the seller regarding Fincen guidelines.

I'm pretty impressed by that little bitcoin video. That is very positive news in my opinion. Maybe paypal won't be our great enemy after all.

Don't kid yourself. They just froze funds for Mailpile. They won't do anything until they have figured out how to corral Bitcoin into black-hole eBay branded wallets.

I'm sure they figured that out before they made this video.

http://deals.ebay.com/blog/whats-the-deal-with-bitcoins-anyway/
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
I'm registered as a business with eBay (I think) and I sold about $30,000 USD worth of Casascius Coins on eBay. When the original voicemail was left for me I think he was looking to gain information on whether or not I would return to selling BTC on eBay if their policies were adjusted to allow it, (hence the incorporating it into ebay as an allowable item to sell). Then when we got on the phone we began discussing how PayPal can eliminate or reduce the liability to the seller regarding Fincen guidelines.

I'm pretty impressed by that little bitcoin video. That is very positive news in my opinion. Maybe paypal won't be our great enemy after all.

Don't kid yourself. They just froze funds for Mailpile. They won't do anything until they have figured out how to corral Bitcoin into black-hole eBay branded wallets.

That would still probably make us rich = fine with me.
Jump to: