Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33037.

lucas.sev

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 23, 2013, 01:15:28 PM

By the way, MtGox already has working API for LTC/USD:
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/ticker
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/depth/fetch
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/trades/fetch

My prediction is the price for LTC will be at least $12-15 when Gox starts working with it.

And bitcoin will be 700$?

fr33d0miz3r

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

By the way, MtGox already has working API for LTC/USD:
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/ticker
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/depth/fetch
http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/LTCUSD/trades/fetch

My prediction is the price for LTC will be at least $12-15 when Gox starts working with it.

ShroomsKit

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: N12 on June 23, 2013, 01:08:10 PM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 01:04:10 PM

You'll be fine. Just don't panic sell before it goes to Gox. People will try to take the price down so they can buy cheap before it goes up again. It WILL go up because of Gox eventually.

Unless MtGox delays further or changes its mind again. Cheesy

Yup, that is a possibility for sure sadly enough.

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 23, 2013, 01:08:23 PM

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 01:07:56 PM

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 23, 2013, 01:07:00 PM

While Gox doesn't do USD withdrawals, there is a good opportunity to transfer your BTC from Gox to BTC-E and buy LTC.

Maybe it's their only hope to survive.

Agreed.

I edit it but the meaning is the same...

fr33d0miz3r

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 01:07:56 PM

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 23, 2013, 01:07:00 PM

While Gox doesn't do USD withdrawals, there is a good opportunity to transfer your BTC from Gox to BTC-E and buy LTC.

Maybe it's their only hope to survive.

Agreed.

N12

donator

Activity: 1610

Merit: 1010

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 01:04:10 PM

You'll be fine. Just don't panic sell before it goes to Gox. People will try to take the price down so they can buy cheap before it goes up again. It WILL go up because of Gox eventually.

Unless MtGox delays further or changes its mind again. Cheesy

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: fr33d0miz3r on June 23, 2013, 01:07:00 PM

While Gox doesn't do USD withdrawals, there is a good opportunity to transfer your BTC from Gox to BTC-E and buy LTC.

Maybe Gox trading cryptos like BTC-e is their only hope to survive.

fr33d0miz3r

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

While Gox doesn't do USD withdrawals, there is a good opportunity to transfer your BTC from Gox to BTC-E and buy LTC.

ShroomsKit

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 12:43:11 PM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 12:38:41 PM

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 12:28:31 PM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 12:27:44 PM

Quote from: Its About Sharing on June 23, 2013, 12:21:57 PM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 12:18:36 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:09:18 PM

Quote from: ShroomsKit on June 23, 2013, 11:04:09 AM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 09:35:24 AM

Quote from: N12 on June 23, 2013, 09:13:23 AM

Litecoin's alltime high versus Bitcoin of 0.0449 translates into a valuation of 17.96% of BTC market cap, equating Bitcoin's and Litecoin's eventual 21 million and 84 million supplies.

To reach this high again and maintain it, the market would have to believe that Litecoin will surpass/replace Bitcoin, because even if you grant Litecoin the function of a "backup" or "silver" complement, its valuation would be far lower. Do you really want to place your bets on that?

It's simple, all the scamcoins burn out in an eventual peak that they will never again surpass. They are actual bubbles.

Bring it, though. Pump and dump it HARD. The other scamcoins are already standing in line, they too want a piece of the action: https://support.mtgox.com/forums/20514198-Featured-Requests

Seems Blightcoins are valued at 11.64% of Bitcoin right now. Good luck to anyone holding that bag once the hype subsides. Grin

Petty much agree, bought LTC at roughly 0.0025 and planning to dump 90% of my remaining holdings at aprox. 0.03 or higher, which I guess will happen after Gox announces official ETA.

Already cashed out a big chunk between 0.019 and 0.025, as I said earlier I will just keep a few hundreds of LTC to dump them on Gox regardless of the price, only for the lulz honestly as I expect the best time to dump will be shortly before LTC hits Gox.

Why before it hits Gox?

Because normally all the pump&dump scam coins raise before they hit the exchanges, to fall hard as soon as they hit it. I guess everybody buys on the news this or that scam coin will hit an exchange (normally BTC-e), and then everybody immediately dumps it, as all the "investors" are only after the quick buck...

It *may* be different for LTC and Gox, as this exchange has a huge user base that might never use the their exchanges where LTC is traded, and LTC community is orders of magnitude bigger compared to the other coins, but I'm not going to take that risk with the majority of my holdings... Just with a tiny fraction that I will hold for the lulz. I'm assuming people will buy like crazy when there will be an official ETA to Gox, and in my book that's the best time to sell, when everybody is buying enthusiastically and bullishly.

Yeah that makes sense. Although many people won't be buying before it hits Gox. So as soon as it hits it my guess is there will be panic buying that will double the price.
We'll see.

Rampion may be correct to sell shortly before LTC hits Gox (sell on the news). But, there are going to be a lot of people who will want LTC that don't currently have them. S3052 may very well be right in that the price will jump to $4-$6 per LTC. I picked up some today (even though I was initially against it), it is a gamble as I think BTC is going down from here, but hopefully LTC goes up enough to overcome that.

I think it will get there even before hitting Gox. And to 10 dollars (for a very short time) once on Gox.

Damn, I just bought!

Dude, i'm just guessing. Please don't take any of this seriously.

2BTC won't hurt much (I think....)

You'll be fine. Just don't panic sell before it goes to Gox. People will try to take the price down so they can buy cheap before it goes up again. It WILL go up because of Gox eventually.

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:49:07 PM

Quote from: crumbs on June 23, 2013, 12:28:00 PM

Wasn't it you who mentioned that they were mining? Technically (afaik), that qualifies as "transmitting money."

I hadn't heard that they were mining, but that could subject them to the law if they sell their mined BTC. I can't imagine they would do that after reading the FinCen guidelines.

Can miners refuse to verify blocks & accept transaction fees? If not -- facilitating money transmission. Amirite?

kickinyou

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Now we will see some dumps !

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

And not just his housekeeper, go look up a picture of her.
Unbelievable.

Down Down Down!! Tongue

Well this is the price of injecting supraridiculous doses of Test on your butt!

QuestionAuthority

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1393

You lead and I'll watch you walk away.

Quote from: ?? on ??

And not just his housekeeper, go look up a picture of her.
Unbelievable.

I kind of miss the Govenator.

ChartBuddy

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1819

1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 12:53:33 PM

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 12:45:56 PM

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 12:44:43 PM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 23, 2013, 12:36:52 PM

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:31:14 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:10:25 PM

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.

No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.

They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.

The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.

What if the state already knows they aren't a money transmitter but are looking to engage the membership all at once. Some of them are money transmitters. Remember, California is broke. Fines represent real income for the state. On a side note, they just raised the parking meter violation fine next to my house in SF. It's $90 now! This place is fucked!

What the hell happened with Arnold? I like this dude (I am not US citizen)...

He got caught making a baby with his house keeper. No joke.

LMAO I had forgot about that one!

QuestionAuthority

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1393

You lead and I'll watch you walk away.

Quote from: klee on June 23, 2013, 12:45:56 PM

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 12:44:43 PM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 23, 2013, 12:36:52 PM

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:31:14 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:10:25 PM

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.

No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.

They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.

The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.

What if the state already knows they aren't a money transmitter but are looking to engage the membership all at once. Some of them are money transmitters. Remember, California is broke. Fines represent real income for the state. On a side note, they just raised the parking meter violation fine next to my house in SF. It's $90 now! This place is fucked!

What the hell happened with Arnold? I like this dude (I am not US citizen)...

He got caught making a baby with his house keeper. No joke.

ElectricMucus

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1057

Marketing manager - GO MP

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 12:44:43 PM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 23, 2013, 12:36:52 PM

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:31:14 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:10:25 PM

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.

No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.

They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.

The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.

What if the state already knows they aren't a money transmitter but are looking to engage the membership all at once. Some of them are money transmitters. Remember, California is broke. Fines represent real income for the state. On a side note, they just raised the parking meter violation fine next to my house in SF. It's $90 now! This place is fucked!

Yes that also makes sense, understanding how Buerocrats think isn't that hard...

Pale Phoenix

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: crumbs on June 23, 2013, 12:28:00 PM

Wasn't it you who mentioned that they were mining? Technically (afaik), that qualifies as "transmitting money."

I hadn't heard that they were mining, but that could subject them to the law if they sell their mined BTC. I can't imagine they would do that after reading the FinCen guidelines.

klee

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: QuestionAuthority on June 23, 2013, 12:44:43 PM

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 23, 2013, 12:36:52 PM

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:31:14 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:10:25 PM

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.

No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.

They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.

The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.

What if the state already knows they aren't a money transmitter but are looking to engage the membership all at once. Some of them are money transmitters. Remember, California is broke. Fines represent real income for the state. On a side note, they just raised the parking meter violation fine next to my house in SF. It's $90 now! This place is fucked!

What the hell happened with Arnold? I like this dude (I am not US citizen)...

QuestionAuthority

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1393

You lead and I'll watch you walk away.

Quote from: ElectricMucus on June 23, 2013, 12:36:52 PM

Quote from: Pale Phoenix on June 23, 2013, 12:31:14 PM

Quote from: Rampion on June 23, 2013, 12:10:25 PM

But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.

No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.

They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.

The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.

What if the state already knows they aren't a money transmitter but are looking to engage the membership all at once. Some of them are money transmitters. Remember, California is broke. Fines represent real income for the state. On a side note, they just raised the parking meter violation fine next to my house in SF. It's $90 now! This place is fucked!

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33037. (Read 26497515 times)