Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33150. (Read 26496612 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink

Is there anyone who is not?
Those who held 100% fiat and waited for the price to drop to $2 one more time, back in 2011. Ooops  Wink

Interesting difference with 2011, trading levels remained at new highs (ish) all the way down ( line = price, points = volume):




But this time, fewer and fewer people are interested post-peak of the  bubble, perhaps because most folk know what's coming and don't support the price :



 
10c
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 100
BuyAnyLight - Blockchain LED Marketplace


I suppose they had their entry points at which they decided the bear market is over, just like me. I think we will drop to 30's but if we get through certain point above current price I will enter.

So whats your panic buy threshold?
KS
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.
fake support?
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
BTW: How can laissez-faire ("let it be", "let it go") be diluted? These are two very common french words and merely translating them leads to the correct definition: no government involvement in the market! No exceptions.
It's weird, I had a discussion recently where I used that word, and the other party assumed I was talking about a "less" regulated market, but still regulated. It's kind of like the diluted version of capitalism is starting to spread. I still use laissez-faire though, and like you, point it out if people got it wrong.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink

Is there anyone who is not?
Those who held 100% fiat and waited for the price to drop to $2 one more time, back in 2011. Ooops  Wink

I suppose they had their entry points at which they decided the bear market is over, just like me. I think we will drop to 30's but if we get through certain point above current price I will enter.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
I don't know you're political believes. But capitalism is an example of a word, that now, by the majority means a "government regulated marked / corporatism" and not a free market. Because of this, I do not use the word "capitalism " anymore, instead I use voluntaryism, anarcho-capitalism etc. Even "laissez-faire" has been somewhat diluted lately to define a regulated market. In your opinion I would be better of sticking with "capitalism" even though majority will misinterpret it. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree Smiley

Indeed I guess we do, because in the above examples I would choose to use the words as they are intended. If during the discussion we find out (usually quickly) that people use it incorrectly I will try to correct them.

We do share a political preference it seems (Anarcho-Capitalism)

BTW: How can laissez-faire ("let it be", "let it go") be diluted? These are two very common french words and merely translating them leads to the correct definition: no government involvement in the market! No exceptions.
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink

Is there anyone who is not?
Those who held 100% fiat and waited for the price to drop to $2 one more time, back in 2011. Ooops  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
And once again I disagree  Cheesy
Why?

You say I should take their definition because I don't have power over them. That's nonsense.
It makes it very difficult to communicate with someone if their definitions differentiates from the majority. It doesn't have to do with surrendering anything.

I cannot and will not accept a definition that's internally inconsistent. Even if all others in the world do accept it. You're right this may impede communication.
I don't know you're political believes. But capitalism is an example of a word, that now, by the majority means a "government regulated marked / corporatism" and not a free market. Because of this, I do not use the word "capitalism " anymore, instead I use voluntaryism, anarcho-capitalism etc. Even "laissez-faire" has been somewhat diluted lately to define a regulated market. In your opinion I would be better off sticking with "capitalism" even though majority will misinterpret it. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink

Is there anyone who is not?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?

Almost - anyhow, I'm just trolling. You guys know i'm a long term perma-bull Wink
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Sure sounds like there's a lot of SR vendors on this thread, trying to morally justify they are just that  Roll Eyes

Maybe bitcoin economy is mostly SR afterall...

Bitcoin economy = SR + asic companies to mine bitcoins Cheesy

You forget that 99% is pure speculation - like in fiat economy. Or just compare Forex daily turnover ($3.98 trillion) with any other business in the world.

Speculation drives economy in the capitalist system. That's it.



I don't forget that. I'm saying that once speculation is gone all that's left is SR and ASIC companies Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
And once again I disagree  Cheesy
Why?

You say I should take their definition because I don't have power over them. That's nonsense.
It makes it very difficult to communicate with someone if their definitions differentiates from the majority. It doesn't have to do with surrendering anything.

I cannot and will not accept a definition that's internally inconsistent. Even if all others in the world do accept it. You're right this may impede communication.
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
And once again I disagree  Cheesy
Why?

You say I should take their definition because I don't have power over them. That's nonsense.
It makes it very difficult to communicate with someone if their definitions differentiates from the majority. It doesn't have to do with surrendering anything.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

What? Has it reached $300k/mBTC already?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.

How about no... you crazy Dutch bastard! Buy in with all that green in your wallet!
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
In other news: guys, time to sell. Really.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Sure sounds like there's a lot of SR vendors on this thread, trying to morally justify they are just that  Roll Eyes

Maybe bitcoin economy is mostly SR afterall...

Bitcoin economy = SR + asic companies to mine bitcoins Cheesy

You forget that 99% is pure speculation - like in fiat economy. Or just compare Forex daily turnover ($3.98 trillion) with any other business in the world.

Speculation drives economy in the capitalist system. That's it.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Sure sounds like there's a lot of SR vendors on this thread, trying to morally justify they are just that  Roll Eyes

Maybe bitcoin economy is mostly SR afterall...

Bitcoin economy = SR + asic companies to mine bitcoins Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
And once again I disagree  Cheesy
Why?

You say I should take their definition because I don't have power over them. That's nonsense.
legendary
Activity: 1552
Merit: 1047
Sure sounds like there's a lot of SR vendors on this thread, trying to morally justify they are just that  Roll Eyes

Maybe bitcoin economy is mostly SR afterall...
You are wrong. I never dealt on SR, ever.

Don't take it so seriously, I was just poring oil on the fire  Tongue
That being said, I don't have any moral issues with SR and may very well start dealing there one day. Just don't know what to deal.
Jump to: