Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33746. (Read 26497908 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Looks like resistance at 110 - 115 is waning. Time for 120?
I think the wall at 120 and the strong previous support - now resistance at 121 prevent any crossing of this line for now.

A retracement to 105-6 is in order when the assault to 120 fails. This would be my original prediction from several hours ago.
True, there is resistance at 120-124 (that big volume hammer on the downside) but we broke through it on the rally or bounce out.
I think that makes that resistance weaker, no?
We will need several attempts to leave the resistance levels of about 121, 135 and 150 behind. Then there is 167 and 267, but they were never confirmed with volume anyways.

I prefer to think that the strength of the resistance is important, but equally important is the move required to reach it. It is like marching armies to a battle. Sun Tzu writes:

Quote
Thus, if you order your men to roll up their buff-coats, and make forced marches without halting day or night, covering double the usual distance at a stretch, doing a hundred LI in order to wrest an advantage, the leaders of all your three divisions will fall into the hands of the enemy. The stronger men will be in front, the jaded ones will fall behind, and on this plan only one-tenth of your army will reach its destination.

If you march fifty LI in order to outmaneuver the enemy, you will lose the leader of your first division, and only half your force will reach the goal.

If you march thirty LI with the same object, two-thirds of your army will arrive.

You have a certain buying pressure, but if you want to conquer something that is 100 li (about 25%) away, no matter how weak it is, you will certainly fall. After such a move, sellers smell any sign of blood, and the 61% retracement is sure to happen. (This is pretty much my trading strategy: only sell after this move, because you cannot really lose)

If you need to advance 50 li (12.5%) and then demolish the wall, half of the buying pressure is already relieved, and likely the wall will hold. Even if it falls, the chances are great that the region will be revisited sooner or later.

After 30 li (7.5%) you have a mighty power to attack a wall, but even then, the victory is not sure.

Depending of the strength of the resistance, it should take up to 4 assaults to conquer it. No matter how strongly you destroy the wall, the region will be revisited. From hindsight, it was not a surprise that $50 support defended 4 intraday assaults during the mid-April crash. It took 5 assaults to conquer it when it was a resistance.

I admit I was wrong with my $115 never again call. I just did not see any stronger holds than $121 which was the 1st retracement of the 50->167 move. My fundamental analysis bias is also there. I see sub-1000 bitcoin as so insanely great a buy that I have a hard time differentiating between 134 and 78, although I probably should...Wink

That's better, you can do it when you decide to not act stupid.
hero member
Activity: 628
Merit: 500
I think it's an extremely low volume, it's possible that we are overreacting.
You don't say? Bitcoin overreaching? Tongue

I'm just saying completely the same volume as 30-days ago on BTCChina
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
Looks like resistance at 110 - 115 is waning. Time for 120?
I think the wall at 120 and the strong previous support - now resistance at 121 prevent any crossing of this line for now.

A retracement to 105-6 is in order when the assault to 120 fails. This would be my original prediction from several hours ago.
True, there is resistance at 120-124 (that big volume hammer on the downside) but we broke through it on the rally or bounce out.
I think that makes that resistance weaker, no?
We will need several attempts to leave the resistance levels of about 121, 135 and 150 behind. Then there is 167 and 267, but they were never confirmed with volume anyways.

I prefer to think that the strength of the resistance is important, but equally important is the move required to reach it. It is like marching armies to a battle. Sun Tzu writes:

Quote
Thus, if you order your men to roll up their buff-coats, and make forced marches without halting day or night, covering double the usual distance at a stretch, doing a hundred LI in order to wrest an advantage, the leaders of all your three divisions will fall into the hands of the enemy. The stronger men will be in front, the jaded ones will fall behind, and on this plan only one-tenth of your army will reach its destination.

If you march fifty LI in order to outmaneuver the enemy, you will lose the leader of your first division, and only half your force will reach the goal.

If you march thirty LI with the same object, two-thirds of your army will arrive.

You have a certain buying pressure, but if you want to conquer something that is 100 li (about 25%) away, no matter how weak it is, you will certainly fall. After such a move, sellers smell any sign of blood, and the 61% retracement is sure to happen. (This is pretty much my trading strategy: only sell after this move, because you cannot really lose)

If you need to advance 50 li (12.5%) and then demolish the wall, half of the buying pressure is already relieved, and likely the wall will hold. Even if it falls, the chances are great that the region will be revisited sooner or later.

After 30 li (7.5%) you have a mighty power to attack a wall, but even then, the victory is not sure.

Depending of the strength of the resistance, it should take up to 4 assaults to conquer it. No matter how strongly you destroy the wall, the region will be revisited. From hindsight, it was not a surprise that $50 support defended 4 intraday assaults during the mid-April crash. It took 5 assaults to conquer it when it was a resistance.

I admit I was wrong with my $115 never again call. I just did not see any stronger holds than $121 which was the 1st retracement of the 50->167 move. My fundamental analysis bias is also there. I see sub-1000 bitcoin as so insanely great a buy that I have a hard time differentiating between 134 and 78, although I probably should...Wink
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Agree, you'r buying instinct is state of the art. Those 700 bought at 134 day before 40% crash is the move of the Master tactician  Grin

It was irresistible, goat sold to me at 3% discount to Gox!!  Embarrassed

At the time of the deal the terms were in your favour (if we skip over the no-escrow part). Goat admitted to making a slightly unprofitable deal to see whether you could actually cough up $92k. That the market went significantly south after that is just bad luck (and unimportant in the long run).

Sure, it's very unimportant to a day trader like him to make a deal that stopped him adding 30-40 or even 50% if he'd cought bottom more coins to his collection next day. 200-300 coins difference.. meh, it's nothing

Fantastic, you can really read all kind of business theories here Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I think it's an extremely low volume, it's possible that we are overreacting.
You don't say? Bitcoin overreaching? Tongue
hero member
Activity: 628
Merit: 500
I was very optimistic about China news, but then I visited this:

http://bitcoinity.org/markets/btcchina/CNY

I think it's an extremely low volume, it's possible that we are overreacting.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 501
If I had that much influence in the Bitcoin world, and I proclaimed that it would NEVER hit $95 again, I would use my supernode powers to AT LEAST make sure it didn't hit $95 about six hours later,  LMAO.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
Agree, you'r buying instinct is state of the art. Those 700 bought at 134 day before 40% crash is the move of the Master tactician  Grin

It was irresistible, goat sold to me at 3% discount to Gox!!  Embarrassed

At the time of the deal the terms were in your favour (if we skip over the no-escrow part). Goat admitted to making a slightly unprofitable deal to see whether you could actually cough up $92k. That the market went significantly south after that is just bad luck (and unimportant in the long run).
SAQ
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Right

2k on 113-114

Bears, I say, run for your lives!
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
I expected it to be up to 107-108 today but I'm very surprised to see this volume higher than that. Guess that China stuff played the part, people are very keen to react on bitcoin news, both good or bad.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
Bitcoin prices have always followed the principle of least expectation...
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Another strange day in Bitcoin business  Grin
hero member
Activity: 628
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
Double digits incomming Cheesy

Nice piccy! Now it really does look like an eighties Phil Collins album cover.  Grin
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 501
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
Looks like resistance at 110 - 115 is waning. Time for 120?

I think the wall at 120 and the strong previous support - now resistance at 121 prevent any crossing of this line for now.

A retracement to 105-6 is in order when the assault to 120 fails. This would be my original prediction from several hours ago.

True, there is resistance at 120-124 (that big volume hammer on the downside) but we broke through it on the rally or bounce out.
I think that makes that resistance weaker, no?
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
I don't think we will see 105 again today. If the posters here are correct that the wall at 111 was eaten rather than pulled - I wasn't here so did not see it - I think then 120 will become support today.

It was eaten. I saw it too
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
Double digits incomming Cheesy

I remember when that would've been a bullish statement, way back in July 2012...
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
supernode
Double digits incomming Cheesy
SAQ
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
I don't think we will see 105 again today. If the posters here are correct that the wall at 111 was eaten rather than pulled - I wasn't here so did not see it - I think then 120 will become support today.
Jump to: