hisslyness, I suspect that you are being intentionally obtuse. Nonetheless, this needs emphasis for the sake of others:
Just because there's apparently no trace of you owning Bitcoin, interacting with Bitcoin, doesn't make it any less illegal
So what?
(not the right choice of word, but keeping in the theme of less vulnerable),
I chose my words carefully. You did not read them carefully.
if the above scenario was to come true. You are in the same boat as everyone else!
No, I am not: I am in the boat where I am free to decide whether or not I choose voluntarily to comply with this hypothetical law that I believe I have an ethical obligation to resist. Resistance would, in this case, be quite simple for me: Ignore the bad law.
>99% of WO hatters are not in that boat: They are known Bitcoiners. KYC records link them to some or all of their coins; mass-surveillance would link them to anything they believe they can get away with. Anything that they try to hide can most likely be caught—I say that as an expert on anonymity and, thus perforce, deanonymization; disagree with me at your own risk. “They” here most likely includes
you.
At this juncture, I must remind the intelligent reader: My point was not to put on some show of bravado, but to the contrary!
I am worried about laws adverse to Bitcoin, even though such laws are personally irrelevant to me.The fools who brag that governments can’t stop Bitcoin are the types who would easily be stopped from using Bitcoin.
Easily.I have a high degree of financial privacy, because I have an activist streak. All of my money originates from legal sources. Regardless, I decided long ago that my money is nobody’s business but my own. I decided to live the cypherpunk dream. Accordingly, I am actually in a position where I can say:
Your law is not law.Now, I am trying to shake people out of their complacency—because I have an activist streak. And I am horrified to see people boasting that governments can’t stop Bitcoin. It is childish, stupid, and irresponsible.
Stop it. Not for my sake—it does not directly affect me. For Bitcoin’s sake. It’s bad for Bitcoin.
For those who need a reminder of the context,
this is bad for Bitcoin:
This is even worse than “Billionaires in my following, go ahead, see what happens”.“U.S. government, go ahead, see what happens.”Politicians really have basic problems in understanding Bitcoin - because who cares what they think - Satoshi didn't ask permission from anyone when he invented Bitcoin...
>99% of WO hatters are not me, and not anything like me.
Why you gotta be like that?
Why you gotta rip that out of context?
Because I'm only concerned about your use of the term "hatters"
Oh,
that made you mad? Is “hatters” politically incorrect in some way of which I was unaware?
“Mad Hatters” sounds like a good nickname for denizens of the Wall.
(
h/t to
my Evil Hat(TM) for the idea.)