Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3591. (Read 26608279 times)

legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[edited out]
*edit(): Like we are watching you dummy.   Shocked  Shocked

For sure I am starting to feel lil ting-a-lees of lovey-dovey sensations.

How could you do that?

 Cry Cry Cry

So it's Musk's Twitter now.


Even though I often think he is full of shit, it's good to have a Bitcoiner own that huge social network.

I hope he will implement lightning for tips or something rather than using dogshitcointm


We might also see BTC on their balance sheet in the future, like he did with Tesla.


Interesting times

It could be that Elon is a bitcoiner... he has some weird ways of showing it sometimes, and maybe I am just contrasting him to Jack Dorsey, who seems like a genuine bitcoiner rather than a fly by your panties kind of guy (at least in regards to his bitcoin related public stances) that Musk seems to represent with more than half of the internally contradicting ways that he has discussed the matter of bitcoin (does he/Musk even know what it is?).

Even though I often think he is full of shit, it's good to have a Bitcoiner own that huge social network.

Elon Musk is not a "Bitcoiner". Nor a bitcoiner. Just an attention-whoring vacuous dolt who needs his own "special media" site to soothe his narcissism.

I share your characterization of him.
But as far as we know he privately holds Bitcoin (not the Tesla btc), and probably more than most peeps on the WO.

Yeah, he could probably own 0.000001% of his wealth in bitcoin and own more than "most peeps on the WO."

For me a Bitcoiner, or a bitcoiner like you seem to prefer writing it, is someone who privately holds bitcoin.
What's your definition ?

Understanding bitcoin might be helpful.. including publicly appreciating that bitcoin is better than Dogggie coin.. .. also he speaks a lot of nonsense about energy matters related to bitcoin..   Likely many bitcoiners recognize that Elon still is grappling with understanding what the fuck is bitcoin, and maybe he is learning more with the passage of time about bitcoin, and it would be nice to see a wee bit of consistency in his actual ways of talking about bitcoin publicly, if he is even capable of such beyond what suchmoon has already described regarding Elon's own seeming personality deficiencies that might cause him to be unable to express himself clearly in regards to whether he loves(and accepts) King Daddy (as his lord savior) or not.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard


Seems probable in general, but not so much in this macro environment.
However... what do I know.

A shot of hopium is always nice though.

legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
Quote
According to data from Cambridge University, Russia is the world's third-biggest destination for bitcoin mining.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/20/us-treasury-sanctions-russian-bitcoin-miners.html



This is fucking over reach especially because its operations are moved to Switzerland.




Quote
BitRiver's parent company is based in Switzerland and “has never provided services to Russian government institutions” or worked with entities already targeted by sanctions, Igor Runets, the company's CEO and founder, claimed to CoinDesk.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/04/21/bitriver-calls-ofac-sanctions-unfair-anti-competitive-move-to-benefit-us-miners/
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
Even though I often think he is full of shit, it's good to have a Bitcoiner own that huge social network.

Elon Musk is not a "Bitcoiner". Nor a bitcoiner. Just an attention-whoring vacuous dolt who needs his own "special media" site to soothe his narcissism.

I share your characterization of him.
But as far as we know he privately holds Bitcoin (not the Tesla btc)... And probably more than most peeps on the WO.

For me a Bitcoiner (or a bitcoiner like you seem to prefer writing it) is someone who privately holds bitcoin.
What's your definition ?



legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Even though I often think he is full of shit, it's good to have a Bitcoiner own that huge social network.

Elon Musk is not a "Bitcoiner". Nor a bitcoiner. Just an attention-whoring vacuous dolt who needs his own "special media" site to soothe his narcissism.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 75
UCT (United Crowd)



Lets See if market follows the Trend a new ATH can be here in 2022 as well even i am still standing with side ways movement of the BTC.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
I think it would be easy to underestimate the magnitude of the Musk Twitter purchase.

To wit tho, it would be just as easy to overestimate it. Even if he were to fire the whole board.

I also think insiders would try to sabotage Twitter right under Elon's nose.

If policies changed under Elon's new leadership, I could see disgruntled libtard content enforcement employees who would start to "allow" certain accounts and content a pass that got censored before...think serial rapists, murderers, terrorists, radicals, etc.

Once one of these accounts was implicated in a major crime, it would get blamed on Elon's new policies of "free speech".

There are powerful forces at work who need Twitter to remain the mouthpiece of the liberal WEF agenda.

Agree generally.  But it will at least be interesting to watch it unfold.  
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
Gentlemen, update your nodes:



I'd personally wait a couple of weeks, watch the node count of the new version go up a bit first.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
So it's Musk's Twitter now.


Even though I often think he is full of shit, it's good to have a Bitcoiner own that huge social network.

I hope he will implement lightning for tips or something rather than using dogshitcointm


We might also see BTC on their balance sheet in the future, like he did with Tesla.


Interesting times
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 4197




  You do you.. I am just saying.. for sure, each of us have styles and they are not always going to be appealable or understandable for others, but they still might have effects of making the point or even resonating with some folks better than others.**

I have to add a disclaimer here.. just for funzies (aka my own protections)...


**Nothing that I said in the above post (nor my meriting of any of Torque's posts) should be construed that yours truly actually agrees or endorses any of the ideas, projections or actions of said Torque in this post, Torque's past posts or his anticipated future postenings however such posts might evolve (or devolve).







hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
You had me with the idea of potential internal sabotage of Elon, but how far you went into specifics with your example got too far into the weeds, even if something like that were to end up playing out in the real world..

I just could not go that far into those kinds of details with you without starting to feel somewhat queezie regarding what conspiratorial minds are going to come up with. .. just too much intensity for my whimpy lil selfie.   Cry Cry

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

And therein lies the problem with the Average Joe public, J. They just can't wrap their head around the fact that TPTB are fucking devious in the lengths they will go to sabotage a company, or someone.

Corporate espionage and sabotage is a real thing, btw. It happens all the time. Proven history. It's not just a wacko conspiracy thing.

I agree with you that they are willing to go to way further ends than any of us might imagine, but sometimes your getting into some of the projected specifics seems to take away from your message and cause you to appear like a luny...   You do you.. I am just saying.. for sure, each of us have styles and they are not always going to be appealable or understandable for others, but they still might have effects of making the point or even resonating with some folks better than others.**

I have to add a disclaimer here.. just for funzies (aka my own protections)...


**Nothing that I said in the above post (nor my meriting of any of Torque's posts) should be construed that yours truly actually agrees or endorses any of the ideas, projections or actions of said Torque in this post, Torque's past posts or his anticipated future postenings however they might evolve (or devolve).


Juanitá Journalisté ?!? .. Are you trying to discredit people on this forum again?? Their conspiracies are fact and common sense. There are always and will always be public groups or secret groups fighting for some inner power struggle battles among themselves in their inner congregation, corporation, conspiracy, coordination, corruption. They always think as primitive monkeys that they should get better things and they should fight each other because they feel like they have the divine right to do so because of the circumstances to acquire those things deserves to them.
But they are trapped into their own bubble of reality, and always forget that some others are watching.
 Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes

*edit(): Like we are watching you dummy.   Shocked  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
You had me with the idea of potential internal sabotage of Elon, but how far you went into specifics with your example got too far into the weeds, even if something like that were to end up playing out in the real world..

I just could not go that far into those kinds of details with you without starting to feel somewhat queezie regarding what conspiratorial minds are going to come up with. .. just too much intensity for my whimpy lil selfie.   Cry Cry

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

And therein lies the problem with the Average Joe public, J. They just can't wrap their head around the fact that TPTB are fucking devious in the lengths they will go to sabotage a company, or someone.

Corporate espionage and sabotage is a real thing, btw. It happens all the time. Proven history. It's not just a wacko conspiracy thing.

I agree with you that they are willing to go to way further ends than any of us might imagine, but sometimes your getting into some of the projected specifics seems to take away from your message and cause you to appear like a luny...   You do you.. I am just saying.. for sure, each of us have styles and they are not always going to be appealable or understandable for others, but they still might have effects of making the point or even resonating with some folks better than others.**

I have to add a disclaimer here.. just for funzies (aka my own protections)...


**Nothing that I said in the above post (nor my meriting of any of Torque's posts) should be construed that yours truly actually agrees or endorses any of the ideas, projections or actions of said Torque in this post, Torque's past posts or his anticipated future postenings however such posts might evolve (or devolve).
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
I think it would be easy to underestimate the magnitude of the Musk Twitter purchase.

If policies changed under Elon's new leadership, I could see disgruntled libtard content enforcement employees who would start to "allow" certain accounts and content a pass that got censored before...think serial rapists, murderers, terrorists, radicals, etc.




I believe that they already have given rapists murders and terrorists and radicals free reign on there...which weirdly enough is not and was not the problem,  the problem is that they did not allow a level playing field for other people.

ie pretty sure, Epstein, Sulamani/ the ayatollahs/ Iranian president , Hillary Clinton, Antifa etc etc all had/have free reign on Twitter..


...you are right though that the libtard control freaks will without a doubt attempt to twist it, and turn it, and blame a tweet for some awful event... but, it will be just that, a twisting of the truth.


Tweets do not kill people..... people do, and there is already enough laws to deal with the crimes people commit.  


  
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429
You had me with the idea of potential internal sabotage of Elon, but how far you went into specifics with your example got too far into the weeds, even if something like that were to end up playing out in the real world..

I just could not go that far into those kinds of details with you without starting to feel somewhat queezie regarding what conspiratorial minds are going to come up with. .. just too much intensity for my whimpy lil selfie.   Cry Cry

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

And therein lies the problem with the Average Joe public, J. They just can't wrap their head around the fact that TPTB are fucking devious in the lengths they will go to sabotage a company, or someone.

Corporate espionage and sabotage is a real thing, btw. It happens all the time. Proven history. It's not just a wacko conspiracy thing.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I think it would be easy to underestimate the magnitude of the Musk Twitter purchase.

To wit tho, it would be just as easy to overestimate it. Even if he were to fire the whole board.

I also think insiders would try to sabotage Twitter right under Elon's nose.

If policies changed under Elon's new leadership, I could see disgruntled libtard content enforcement employees who would start to "allow" certain accounts and content a pass that got censored before...think serial rapists, murderers, terrorists, radicals, etc.

Once one of these accounts was implicated in a crime, it would get blamed on Elon's new policies of "free speech".

There are powerful forces at work who need Twitter to remain the mouthpiece of the liberal WEF agenda.

Oh my... I am thinking that gotta try to see some humor in how far you might take these kinds of speculative matters sometimes in order to make your point, Torque. Oh my.

You had me with the idea of potential internal sabotage of Elon, but how far you went into specifics with your example got too far into the weeds, even if something like that were to end up playing out in the real world..

I just could not go that far into those kinds of details with you without starting to feel somewhat queezie regarding what conspiratorial minds are going to come up with. .. just too much intensity for my whimpy lil selfie.   Cry Cry

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Jump to: