Good catch..the're lots of super opinionated people around here.
So his reason to say negative things to me on is because I have been posting Bearish things earlier.
Doesn't that shows my stand on something which I believe is going to happen?
People don't even understand the word "Opinion".
The discrimination is surreal and affects my mental health.
This place is not OPEN for discussion, this place is just another thread where they want to hear only HOPIUM news for BTC.
Sick.
Hey, ImThour, chill man, no one is out to get you. These are dee intertoobz!
It's good to have an opinion and post it here, but doing so gives everyone the right to respond. It just so happens that most of us here in WO have recognized and have understood the reasons for Bitcoin's long-term UPPity trend, so it is more or less expected that bearish posts are essentially giving credence to the outliers rather than the substance of Bitcoin's trend-line.
If you ask me, I would treat both short-term bearish and short-term bullish predictions as semi-jokes and meme material. There is no point in predicting the outcome of the tossing of a coin. It doesn't matter if you pick Heads or Tails, the chances are exactly 50%, thus such predictions are Crystal Ball material. Believe it or not, short-term Bitcoin price action is very similar to a toss of a coin. As much as I'd like it to be Heads, I cannot take that prediction seriously. Same for Tails. And, given Bitcoin's long-term UPpity trend, as clearly shown by the 200-Week MA, betting on bearish short-term price action is like picking Tails on a coin that's biased for Heads, making such prediction even less credible.
If you're short-term bearish or bullish, you will be right and you will also be wrong. Reason: price action is locally random. Toss a coin.
So, sure, you can be as bearish as you like, but you should expect replies, some of which may not be favorable.
On another unpopular opinion, I agree with cAPSLOCK's stance on the necessity of banks in the world. As much as I hate banks, I do recognize that not all human beings are (or can be) tech-savvy enough to be able to "be their own bank". There's a reason for banks, but the huge benefit that Bitcoin has given the world is that now there is a choice. Can you handle "being your own bank"? You can choose to do it. Too complicated for you? Let a 3rd party handle it. There is a choice. Forcing all humans to "be their own bank" is both impossible and unethical. So, I see banks existing and even thriving in the Bitcoin era. Much like the music industry fought iTunes as the enemy, and then fully embraced it. The music industry still exists and is still making money BTW.
The above opinion is unpopular in WO. I will surely get many negative responses, calling me retarded and all, but I don't mind. That's what I believe and I post it. So, you post your stuff and don't let the comments affect you in any way. Time will tell who was right and who was wrong anyway.
My 2 sats.
