Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4536. (Read 26623619 times)

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.


I’ll know what I’ll be doing tonight

To times is a hint I guess
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


This make me think…. If and when I cash out something, the exchanged BTC must have purpose before selling, like buying something I badly want and can’t cover it with my available FIAT

But keep the FIAT in BTC is keeping wealth safe for when inflation/ hyperinflation comes

I understand for sure about spending fiat first and of course other assets/currencies that are less hard than bitcoin, but I still think that you better be considering your cashflows 6 months to 24 months into the future, and you better be careful about holding too much in bitcoin --even if we might want to error a wee bit at this time.. because of where we seem to be in the cycle.. maybe 3 months to 11 months... but there could be a pretty decently sized correction in BTC too that is way greater than the ongoing debasing value of fiat... so when the BTC correction comes it still may well correct 80% or so against the dollar.. .. but there may well be UP before there is down too.. so any correction in BTC may well not get below current prices, so many scenarios to attempt to account for.. but going all in anything remains a dangerous way to present the short to medium term inflation/deflation matters that we face... which also involves a lot of likely volatility during any kind of 6  month to 24 month cashflow projections that any of us are trying to prudently and reasonably make.
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 961
fly or die
I'd be truly surprised if anything became of it. China is too vested in the U.S. to sink their interests, and the rest of the worlds'. That type of war isn't really being fought anymore, we've moved on to other ways, with combat performed by contractors in 3rd world proxys.

China isn't really doing that, though.

The problem with Taiwan is specific, and is used to gather national fervor. Some unrelated crisis in China, say an energy crisis or a real estate one (both happening right now...), and the government might find it's the right time to create a diversion by invading.

But I agree, there is a big risk, and not just with the US, I would think the whole western world would sanction China, so their export economy would be in big trouble.

Biden is simply raising the stakes, since Trump's position was ambiguous.
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
working on the new chicken barn.

hahahahaha

a chicken barn... hahahahaha

I would call it a chicken coop... but hey, that might just be me.   Wink

well, while i may call my chicken coop a chicken coop too maybe outofmemeory has really, really BIG chickens.

perhaps.. perhaps?

Another angle.  yes.

Either BIG ones or a lot of them or maybe he is just a generous kind of guy.. . to give those chickens lots of space for flying, chickening, or whatever chickens might want to do in their chicken barn..

It's a coop, they're regular chickens, fo sure  Cheesy

You mean that you do not have stalls to milk your chickens?



I’m ready brotherens

For sure I am bothered by statements about what king daddy "must" do...

Not into that kind of extreme language, even if it is bullish.. and even if there are better ways of saying that the model suggests that the average is $100k for the period, so in order to achieve the average there are going to be a lot of UPpity price pressures in the coming months.. .. or some better way of presenting the matter rather than asserting that our investment thesis in $160k+ is 100% blah blah blah..  there is nothing 100% in this here world, especially when we are referring to the future.. and furthermore a future that involves the behaviors of a number of humans (who happen to have free will, the last time I checked).
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
Quote
Peter Thiel thinks he may have met Satoshi Nakamoto and says he knows where he'd look for the mysterious bitcoin creator

"My sort of theory on Satoshi's identity was that Satoshi was on that beach in Anguilla," Thiel said

The billionaire was speaking at a Miami conference Wednesday, according to Bloomberg.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/peter-thiel-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin-creator-anguilla-btc-egold-coinbase-2021-10

Why he even cares?
I cannot think of any possible pure motif.

??



I blame the autocorrect..ha ha.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!


I’m ready brotherens

Though I totally get what this guy is saying AND agree with it with my whole body...

Evidently he's not been around long enough to find out you don't tell the corn what it "MUST" do.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
Quote
Peter Thiel thinks he may have met Satoshi Nakamoto and says he knows where he'd look for the mysterious bitcoin creator

"My sort of theory on Satoshi's identity was that Satoshi was on that beach in Anguilla," Thiel said

The billionaire was speaking at a Miami conference Wednesday, according to Bloomberg.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/peter-thiel-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin-creator-anguilla-btc-egold-coinbase-2021-10

Why he even cares?
I cannot think of any possible pure motif.

??

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!


Two things about this...  I drew the channel at the point of the line.. interesting...

But the really meaty bit?  Look at that recovery from the big dump.  The smart money is doing EVERYTHING THEY CAN to keep this sucker down while they load up.  But the moment we see what is really happening is when we get a dump... they are gobbling it up like a cloud of piranhas.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist


And, on another note, you gave up on the cunt topic?  even after you saw the post-history evidence provided by yours truly?  

hahahahaha

Weak..;


Weak.


I must say..... weak....



We already had this discussion a couple of years ago ....

But of course! link or it didn't happen
.....

....... because I have too many posts to sort through...

......
You don't say...

.......

Read it and weep!!!!!  Found it buddy.

Right around March 2019 there was quite a few posts on "the topic."  

Look:

wait wat. surely 'cunt' is pejorative in all flavours of English bar some Aussie banter?

It's not just the Aussies but the Brits too. Even some Canucks who wish to project a Brit/Aussie affectation.

The important thing is to never use it with a woman, only men can be called cunts.

Funny. Women can call men pricks but men can't call women cunts.  Roll Eyes

Bad cunt is perjorative.  Good cunt is affectionate.  

You are good Jay. That's some bad ass searching my friend. I'm reading and weeping a river no less.....


I actually proceeded to read the next few pages of posts (March, 2019) because why not? Wow!  Epic comments from awol legends, and some epic douchebaggery too. 
No need to mention any names. Wo bros can be their own judge. You gotta love the legacy wobness factor.... (apologies for bumping my post)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
copper member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2890
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429
Simply because there is a US regulated BTC futures product/market - CME Futures.  BTC is not (currently) on any US-regulated exchange and so is not itself regulated. I don’t think any spot BTC ETF will be approved until there is a regulated market for it to trade against.

Custodial brokers for BTC will be very few...at least until all banks build the required security tech to become custodial themselves.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 1029
Merit: 712
So... I see that all these Bitcoin ETF launches are by EOY. It's like the SEC is now cramming them all in before Dec 31st.

Hmm...why the rush now SEC? Something happening the first of the new year? Lol



These are all Bitcoin Futures right?

I am all for Institutional Involvement in Bitcoin. Critical Mass etc!

But why the fuck does the SEC allow ETF of Bitcoin Futures and not ETF of Actual/Real Holdings of Bitcoin... blows my mind....

Future really in its basic form is just a gamble on the price movement of Bitcoin. I know some will say it is too hedge etc... but lets face it.. it is what it is.

Now, the SEC will let you Gamble (futures) and  also let you sell some of that action to smaller investors (EFT Futures).... Wow! Talk about running before learning how to crawl...

Anyhow, hope everyone here #BTFD...


Simply because there is a US regulated BTC futures product/market - CME Futures.  BTC is not (currently) on any US-regulated exchange and so is not itself regulated. I don’t think any spot BTC ETF will be approved until there is a regulated market for it to trade against.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 1843
Bought a little of this dip @ roughly $60.700  Cool

I had 6 trades going all the way down, and still missed the bottom by $1,100.00! ran outta fiat! Next time!
Jump to: